메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance dichlobenil
[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

Dichlobenil; herbicide; peer review; pesticide; risk assessment

Indexed keywords


EID: 84874495735     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1705     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (10)

References (12)
  • 2
    • 77956928672 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals on request of EFSA
    • 2009
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals on request of EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(12):1438.
    • (2009) EFSA Journal , vol.7 , Issue.12 , pp. 1438
  • 5
    • 85078379044 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Review Report for the active substance dichlobenil finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health at its meeting on 20 May 2008 in support of a decision concerning the non-inclusion of dichlobenil in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance
    • 25 April 2008
    • European Commission, 2008. Review Report for the active substance dichlobenil finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health at its meeting on 20 May 2008 in support of a decision concerning the non-inclusion of dichlobenil in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance. SANCO/1342/08 – rev.0, 25 April 2008.
    • (2008) SANCO/1342/08 – rev.0
  • 6
    • 0003612765 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2., pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002
    • FOCUS, 2000. “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances”. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002.
    • (2000) “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances” , pp. 202
  • 7
    • 3042767718 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2
    • FOCUS, 2001. “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp.
    • (2001) “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC” , pp. 245
  • 8
    • 85041484927 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0
    • FOCUS, 2007. “Landscape And Mitigation Factors In Aquatic Risk Assessment. Volume 1. Extended Summary and Recommendations”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0. 169 pp.
    • (2007) “Landscape And Mitigation Factors In Aquatic Risk Assessment. Volume 1. Extended Summary and Recommendations” , pp. 169


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.