Sensible use of observational clinical data

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 7-13

  Overhage, J Marc ^a,b   Overhage, Lauren M ^a  

^a REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

bias (epidemiology); computerised; data Interpretation; medical records systems; statistical

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; COMPUTER SECURITY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERNAL BIAS; INTERNAL VALIDITY; INTROSPECTION; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NURSING HOME; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT CARE; POPULATION; PRIVACY;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS;

EID: 84874452581     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: 14770334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280211403598     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Strom BL, Melmon KL The use of pharmacoepidemiology to study beneficial drug effects. In: Pharmacoepidemiology. 3 rd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2000, pp. 553-572. Strom BL, ed.
2. Ayanian JZ. Using administrative data to assess health care outcomes. Eur Heart J. 1999 ; 20: 1689-1691
3. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press ; 2009 :
4. Tang PC, Ralston M, Arrigotti MF, Qureshi L, Graham J. Comparison of methodologies for calculating quality measures based on administrative data versus clinical data from an electronic health record system: implications for performance measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 ; 14: 10-15 (Pubitemid 44909490)
5. Jollis JG, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong ER, Pryor DB, Muhlbaier LH, Mark DB. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med. 1993 ; 119 (8). 844-850 (Pubitemid 24012651)
6. Ceratti A, Roger France FH, Beguin C. Health data quality improvement by comparing administrative medical data and billing data. Int J Med Inform. 2008 ; 77 (8). 527-533 (Pubitemid 351842669)
7. Mark Weiner MD. Presentation at the Midwest Biostatistical Society Meeting, Muncie, Indiana, May 2009.
8. Grannis SJ, Banger A and Harris D. 'Perspectives on Patient Matching: Approaches, Findings, and Challenges [White paper]', Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/ server.pt?open=512&objID=1240&mode=2 on (2009, accessed 4 May 2010).
9. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003 ; 348 (26). 2635-2645 (Pubitemid 36741592)
10. Hunter D. First, gather the data. N Engl J Med. 2006 ; 354: 329-331