Modeling auditory stream segregation by predictive processes

3rd IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, CogInfoCom 2012 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 479-483

  Winkler, I ^a   Bohm, T M ^a   Mill, R W ^b   Bendixen, A ^c   Denham, S L ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b MRC INSTITUTE OF HEARING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STREAM SEGREGATIONS; AUDITORY SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; EMISSION PATTERN; HEURISTIC PRINCIPLE; PREDICTIVE PROCESS; SOUND SOURCE;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

SOURCE SEPARATION;

EID: 84874448630     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CogInfoCom.2012.6422029     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. A. S. Bregman, Auditory Scene Analysis. The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.
2. W. Köhler, Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright, 1947.
3. R. L. Gregory, "Perceptions as hypotheses," Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. B290, pp. 181-197, 1980.
4. M. Bar, "The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions," Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 11, pp. 280-289, 2007.
5. I. Winkler, S. L. Denham, and I. Nelken, "Modeling the auditory scene: Predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects," Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 13, pp. 532-540, 2009.
6. I. Winkler, "In search for auditory object representations," in Unconscious Memory Representations in Perception: Processes and Mechanisms in the Brain. Advances in Consciousness Research, vol. 78, I. Czigler and I. Winkler, Eds. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010, pp. 71-106.
7. K. Friston, "A theory of cortical responses." Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. B360, pp. 815-836, 2005.
8. I. Winkler, "Interpreting the mismatch negativity," J. Psychophysiol., vol. 21, 147-163, 2007.
9. I. Winkler, S. Denham, R. Mill, T. M. Bohm, and A. Bendixen, "Multistability in auditory stream segregation: A predictive coding view." Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. B367, pp. 1001-1012, 2012.
10. L. P. A. S. van Norden, Temporal Coherence in the Perception of Tone Sequences. Doctoral dissertation. Eindhoven: Technical University Eindhoven, 1975.
11. S. L. Denham and I Winkler, "The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams," J. Neurophysiol. Paris, vol. 100, pp. 154-170, 2006.
12. D. Pressnitzer and J. M. Hupé, "Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization," Curr. Biol., vol. 16, pp. 1351-1357, 2006.
13. J. M. Hupé and D. Pressnitzer, "The initial phase of auditory and visual scene analysis," Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. B367, pp, 942-953, 2012.
14. S. L. Denham, K. Gyimesi, G. Stefanics, and I. Winkler, "Perceptual bi-stability in auditory streaming: How much do stimulus features matter?," Learn. Percept., in press.
15. A. Bendixen, S. L. Denham, K. Gyimesi, and I. Winkler, "Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 128, pp. 3658-3666, 2010.
16. S. L. Denham, K. Gyimesi, G. Stefanics, and I. Winkler, "Stability of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming," in The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception E. A. Lopez-Poveda, A. R. Palmer, and R. Meddis, Eds. New York: Springer, 2010, pp. 477-488.
17. M. R. Jones, "Time, our lost dimension - toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory," Psychol. Rev., vol. 83, pp. 323-355, 1976.
18. R. Mill, T. M. Bohm, A. Bendixen, I. Winkler, and S. L. Denham, "CHAINS: Competition and cooperation between fragmentary event predictors in a model of Auditory Scene Analysis" in Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), M. Elhilali and H. Weinert, Eds. IEEE, 2011, pp. 1-6.
19. A. Shpiro, R. Curtu, J. Rinzel, and N. Rubin, "Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models," J. Neurophysiol., vol. 97, pp. 462-473, 2007.
20. N. Ulanovsky. L. Las, and I. Nelken, "Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons," Nat. Neurosci., vol. 6, pp. 391-398, 2003.
21. S. Netser, Y. Zahar, and Y. Gutfreund, "Stimulus-specific adaptation: can it be a neural correlate of behavioral habituation?," J. Neurosci., vol. 31, pp. 17811-17820, 2011.
22. R. Näätänen, and T. Picton, "The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound - a review and an analysis of the component structure," Psychophysiol., vol. 24, pp. 375-425, 1987.
23. A. Shpiro, R. Moreno-Bote, N. Rubin, and J. Rinzel, "Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability," J. Comput. Neurosci., vol. 27, pp. 37-54, 2009.
24. C. R. Laing and C. C. Chow, "A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry," J. Comput. Neurosci., vol. 12, pp. 39-53, 2002.
25. N. K. Logothetis, D. A. Leopold, and D. L. Sheinberg, "What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?," Nature, vol. 380, pp. 621-624, 1996.
26. I. Winkler and N. Cowan, "From sensory to long term memory: Evidence from auditory memory reactivation studies," Exp. Psychol., vol. 52, pp. 3-20, 2005.
27. R. W. Mill, T. M. Bohm, A. Bendixen, I. Winkler, and S. L. Denham, "Modelling the emergence and dynamics of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming," PLoS Comput. Biol., under revision.
28. S. Anstis and S. Saida, "Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency-modulated tones," J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., vol. 11. pp. 257-271, 1985.
29. M. W. Beauvois and R. Meddis, "A computer model of auditory stream segregation," Q. J. Exp. Psychol., vol. A43, 517-541, 1991.
30. S. L. McCabe and M. J. Denham, "A model of auditory streaming," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 101, pp. 1611-1621, 1997.
31. S. Grossberg, K. K. Govindarajan, L. L. Wyse, and M. A. Cohen, "ARTSTREAM: a neural network model of auditory scene analysis and source segregation," Neural. Netw., vol. 17, pp. 511-536, 2004.
32. M. Elhilali and S. A. Shamma, "A cocktail party with a cortical twist: how cortical mechanisms contribute to sound segregation," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 124, pp. 3751-3771, 2008.
33. C. Wang and P. Chang, "An oscillatory correlation model of auditory streaming," Cogn. Neurodyn., vol. 2, pp. 7-19, 2008.
34. J. L. Schwartz, N. Grimault, J. M. Hupé, B. C. J. Moore, and D. Pressnitzer, "Multistability in perception: binding sensory modalities, an overview," Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. B367, pp. 896-905, 2012.
35. C. Alain, S. R. Arnott, and T. W. Picton, "Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: evidence from event-related brain potentials," J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., vol. 27, pp. 1072-1089, 2001.
36. M. Woldorff, J. C. Hansen, and S. A. Hillyard, "Evidence for effects of selective attention in the mid-latency range of the human auditory event-related potential," in Current Trends in Event-Related Potential Research. EEG Supplement, vol. 40, R. Johnson, Jr., J. W. Rohrbaugh, and R. Parasuraman, Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987, pp. 146-154.
37. E. Sussman, I. Winkler, M. Huotilainen, W. Ritter, and R. Näätänen, "Top-down effects on stimulus-driven auditory organization," Cogn. Brain Res., vol. 13, pp. 393-405, 2002.