Long-term outcome after transanal rectal resection in Patients with obstructed defecation syndrome

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 246-252

  Bock, Susanne ^a   Wolff, Katja ^a   Marti, Lukas ^a   Schmied, Bruno M ^a   Hetzer, Franc H ^b  

^a CANTONAL HOSPITAL ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

^b Cantonal Hospital Schaffhausen ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Constipation; Outcomes; Pelvic floor; Stapled TransAnal Rectal Resection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANUS FISSURE; ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTITIS; DEFECATION DISORDER; DISEASE SEVERITY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEMORRHOID; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; OBSTRUCTED DEFECATION SYNDROME; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECTUM RESECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; STAPLED TRANSANAL RECTAL RESECTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; URINE RETENTION; VEIN THROMBOSIS; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; CONSTIPATION; DEFECATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTUM; STAPLER; SURGICAL STAPLING; SYNDROME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONSTIPATION; DEFECATION; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELECTION BIAS; SURGICAL STAPLERS; SURGICAL STAPLING; SYNDROME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84874421153     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827619aa     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dvorkin LS, Knowles CH, Scott SM, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ.Rectal intussusception: characterization of symptomatology.Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:824-831.
2. Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, PescatoriM. Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int JColorectal Dis. 2003;18:369-384.
3. Lenisa L, Schwandner O, Stuto A, et al. STA RR with ContourTranstar: prospective multicentre European study. ColorectalDis. 2009;11:821-827.
4. Ommer A, Rolfs TM, Walz MK. Long-term results of stapledtransanal rectal resection (STA RR) for obstructive defecationsyndrome. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25:1287-1292.
5. Zehler O, Vashist YK, Bogoevski D, et al. Quo vadis STARR?A prospective long-term follow-up of stapled transanal rectalresection for obstructed defecation syndrome. J GastrointestSurg. 2010;14:1349-1354.
6. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G. What is the benefit of anew stapler device in the surgical treatment of obstructed defecation?Three-year outcomes from a randomized controlledtrial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:77-84.
7. Schwandner O, Stuto A, Jayne D, et al. Decision-making algorithmfor the STA RR procedure in obstructed defecation syndrome:position statement of the group of STA RR Pioneers.Surg Innov. 2008;15:105-109.
8. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipationscoring system to simplify evaluation and managementof constipated Patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:681-685.
9. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Calabro G, Maciocco M, Roviaro GC.Stapled transanal rectal resection in solitary rectal ulcer associatedwith prolapse of the rectum: a prospective study. Dis ColonRectum. 2008;51:348-354.
10. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77-97.
11. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Fecal IncontinenceQuality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for Patientswith fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:9-16.
12. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to Score Version 2 of theSF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated;2000.
13. Wolff K, Marti L, Beutner U, Steffen T, Lange J, Hetzer FH.Functional outcome and quality of life after stapled transanalrectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome. Dis ColonRectum. 2010;53:881-888.
14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgicalcomplications: a new proposal with evaluation in acohort of 6336 Patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg.2004;240:205-213.
15. Renzi A, Talento P, Giardiello C, Angelone G, Izzo D, DiSarno G. Stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STA RR) by anew dedicated device for the surgical treatment of obstructeddefaecation syndrome caused by rectal intussusception andrectocele: early results of a multicenter prospective study. Int JColorectal Dis. 2008;23:999-1005.
16. Madbouly KM, Abbas KS, Hussein AM. Disappointing longtermoutcomes after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructeddefecation. World J Surg. 2010;34:2191-2196.
17. Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF, et al. Italian Societyof Colo-Rectal Surgery (SICCR). Results, outcome predictors,and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection forobstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:186-195.
18. Naldini G. Serious unconventional complications of surgerywith stapler for haemorrhoidal prolapse and obstructed defaecationbecause of rectocoele and rectal intussusception.Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:323-327.
19. Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A. Stapled transanal rectalresection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year resultsof the European STA RR Registry. Dis Colon Rectum.2009;52:1205-1212.
20. Weiss EG, McLemore EC. Functional disorders: rectoanal intussusception.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2008;21:122-128.
21. Pescatori M, Gagliardi G. Postoperative complications after procedurefor prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectalresection (STA RR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol. 2008;12:7-19.