Drought tolerance in potato (S. tuberosum L.). Can we learn from drought tolerance research in cereals?

Plant Science

Volumn 205-206, Issue , 2013, Pages 76-86

  Monneveux, Philippe ^a   Ramírez, David A ^a   Pino, María Teresa ^b  

^a INTERNATIONAL POTATO CENTER   (Peru)

^b Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA)   (Chile)

Author keywords

Cereals; Drought tolerance; Potato (S. tuberosum L.)

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ADAPTATION; BREEDING; CEREAL; CLIMATE CHANGE; CROP; DROUGHT; GENETICS; GENOMICS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; POTATO; REVIEW;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BREEDING; CEREALS; CLIMATE CHANGE; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; DROUGHTS; GENOMICS; PHENOTYPE; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; WATER;

EID: 84874400047     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.01.011     Document Type: Review

References (166)

1. FAO, statistical databases FAOSTAT, 2012. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx%23ancor.
2. FAO, New light on a hidden treasure, FAO, Rome, 2009, 136 p.
3. Scott G.J. Plants, people, and the conservation of biodiversity of potatoes in Peru. Nat. Conservação 1985, 9:21-38.
4. Scott G.J., Rosegrant M.W., Ringler C. Global projections for root and tuber crops to the year 2020. Food Policy 2000, 25:561-597.
5. Thiele G., Theisen K., Bonierbale M., Walker T. Targeting the poor and hungry with potato science. Potato J. 2010, 37:75-86.
6. Janski S.H., Jin L.P., Xie K.Y., Xie C.H., Spooner D.M. Potato production and breeding in China. Potato Res. 2009, 52:57-65.
7. Zou X., Zhai P., Zhang Q. Variations in droughts over China: 1951-2003. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32:1-4.
8. Haverkort A.J., Verhagen A., Grashoff C., Uithol P.W.J. Potato-zoning: a decision support system on expanding the potato industry through agro-ecological zoning using the LINTUL simulation approach. Decision Support Systems in Potato Production 2004, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp. 29-44.
9. Simelton E., et al. The socioeconomics of food crop production and climate change vulnerability: a global scale quantitative analysis of how grain crops are sensitive to drought. Food Secur. 2012, 4:163-179.
10. Easterling W.E., et al. Food, fibre and forest products. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability 2007, 273-313. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, C.E. Hanson (Eds.).
11. Hijmans R.J. The effect of climate change on global potato production. Am. J. Potato Res. 2003, 80:271-280.
12. Renault D., Wallender W.W. Nutritional water productivity and diets: from "crop per drop" towards "nutrition per drop". Agric. Water Manag. 2000, 45:275-296.
13. Liu F.L., Shahnazari A., Andersen M.N., Jacobsen S.E., Jensen C.R. Physiological responses of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to partial root-zone drying: ABA signaling, leaf gas exchange, and water use efficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57:3727-3735.
14. Liu F.L., Shahnazari A., Andersen M.N., Jacobsen S.E., Jensen C.R. Effects of deficit irrigation (DI) and partial root drying (PRD) on gas exchange, biomass partitioning, and water use efficiency in potato. Sci. Hort. 2006, 109:113-117.
15. Vacher J.J. Responses of two main Andean crops, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and papa amarga (Solanum juzepczukii Buk.) to drought on the Bolivian Altiplano: significance of local adaptation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1998, 68:99-108.
16. Saeed H., Grove I.G., Kettlewell P.S., Hall N.W. Potential of partial root zone drying as an alternative irrigation technique for potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Ann. Appl. Biol. 2008, 152:71-80.
17. Xie K., et al. Partial root-zone drying irrigation and water utilization efficiency by the potato crop in semi-arid regions in China. Sci. Hort. 2012, 134:20-25.
18. Rojas G., Posadas A., Quiroz R., Holle M., Málaga M. Secado parcial de raíces: una promisoria técnica de riego en papa (Solanum tuberosum L.). Zónas áridas 2007, 11:206-218.
19. Rashidi M., Gholami M. Review of crop water productivity values for tomato, potato, melon, watermelon and cantaloupe in Iran. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2008, 10:432-436.
20. Fleisher D.H., Timlin D.J., Reddy V.R. Elevated carbon dioxide and water stress effects on potato canopy gas exchange, water use, and productivity. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 2008, 148:1109-1122.
21. Nagaz K., Masmoudi M.M., Mechlia N.B. Soil salinity and yield of drip-irrigated potato under different irrigation regimes with saline water in arid conditions of Southern Tunisia. J. Agron. 2007, 6:324-330.
22. Shahnazari A., Liu F.L., Andersen M.N., Jacobsen S.E., Jensen C.R. Effects of partial root-zone drying on yield, tuber size and water use efficiency in potato under field conditions. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100:117-124.
23. Tanner C.B. Transpiration efficiency of potato. Agron. J. 1981, 73:59-64.
24. Yuan B.Z., Nishiyama S., Kang Y. Effects of different irrigation regimes on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated potato. Agric. Water Manag. 2003, 63:153-167.
25. Iwama K., Yamaguchi J. Abiotic stresses. Handbook of Potato Production Improvement and Post Harvest Management 2006, 231-278. Food Product Press, New York. J. Gopal, S.M. Paul Khurana (Eds.).
26. Jeffery R.A. Physiology of crop response to drought. Potato Ecology and Modeling of Crops Under Conditions Limiting Growth 1995, 61-74. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. A.J. Haverkort, D.K.L. MacKerron (Eds.).
27. Martínez C.A., Moreno U. Expresiones fisiológicas de resistencia a sequía en dos variedades de papa sometidas a estrés hídrico. Rev. Brasil. de Fisiol. Veget. 1992, 4:33-38.
28. Deblonde P.M.K., Ledent J.F. Effects of moderate drought conditions on green leaf number, stem height, leaf length and tuber yield of potato cultivars. Eur. J. Agron. 2001, 14:31-41.
29. Kumar S., Asrey R., Mandal G. Effect of differential irrigation regimes on potato (Solanum tuberosum) yield and post-harvest attributes. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2007, 77:366-368.
30. Eiasu B.K., Soundy P., Hammes P.S. Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber yield components to gelpolymer soil amendments and irrigation regimes. N. Z. J. Crop Hort. 2007, 35:25-31.
31. Schafleitner R., et al. Field screening for variation of drought tolerance in Solanum tuberosum L. by agronomical, physiological and genetic analysis. Potato Res. 2007, 50:71-85.
32. MacKerron D.K.L., Jefferies R.A. The distribution of tuber sizes in droughted and irrigated crops of potato. I. Observations on the effect of water stress on graded yields from different cultivars. Potato Res. 1988, 31:269-278.
33. Walworth J.L., Carling D.E. Tuber initiation and development in irrigated and non irrigated potatoes. Am. J. Potato Res. 2002, 79:387-395.
34. Ojala J.C., Stark J.C., Kleinkopf G.E. Influence of irrigation and nitrogen management on potato yield and quality. Am. Potato J. 1990, 67:29-43.
35. Ta J., Kaushik S.K., Minhas J.S., Bhardwaj V. The Potato: Breeding for Biotic and Abiotic Stress 2003, Mehta, New Delhi, 446 p.
36. Deblonde P.M.K., Haverkort A.J., Ledent J.F. Responses of early and late potato cultivars to moderate drought conditions: agronomic parameters and carbon isotope discrimination. Eur. J. Agron. 1999, 11:91-105.
37. Basu P.S., Sharma A., Sukumaran N.P. Changes in net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence in potato leaves induced by water stress. Photosynthetica 1998, 35:13-19.
38. Bustan A., Sagi M., De Malach Y., Pasternak D. Effects of saline irrigation water and heat waves on potato production in an arid environment. Field Crops Res. 2004, 90:275-285.
39. Watkinson J.I., et al. Accessions of Solanum tuberosum ssp. andigena show differences in photosynthetic recovery after drought stress as reflected in gene expression profiles. Plant Sci. 2006, 171(2006):745-758.
40. Coleman W.K. Tuber age as a contributory factor in the water relations of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Am. J. Potato Res. 1988, 65:109-118.
41. Liu F., Jensen C.R., Shahanzari A., Andersen M.N., Jacobsen S.-E. ABA regulated stomatal control and photosynthetic water use efficiency of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during progressive soil drying. Plant Sci. 2005, 168:831-836.
42. Ahmadi S.H., et al. Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field-grown potatoes: gas exchange and xylem ABA. Agric. Water Manag. 2010, 97:1486-1494.
43. Vasquez-Robinet C., et al. Physiological and molecular adaptations to drought in Andean potato genotypes. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59:2109-2123.
44. Fleisher D.H., Timlin D.J., Reddy V.R. Elevated carbon dioxide and water stress effects on potato canopy gas exchange, water use, and productivity. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 2008, 148:109-122.
45. Xu H.L., Qin F.F., Xu Q.C., Tan J.Y., Liu G.M. Applications of xerophytophysiology in plant production-the potato crop improved by partial root zone drying of early season but not whole season. Sci. Hort. 2011, 129:528-534.
46. Basu P.S., Sharma A., Garg I.D., Sukumaran N.P. Tuber sink modifies photosynthetic response in potato under water stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1999, 42:25-39.
47. Schapendonk A.H.C.M., Spitters C.J.T., Groot P.J. Effects of water stress on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of five potato cultivars. Potato Res. 1989, 32:17-32.
48. Kato M.C., Hikosaka K., Hirotsu N., Makino A., Hirose T. The excess light energy that is neither utilized in photosynthesis nor dissipated by photoprotective mechanisms determines the rate of photoinactivation in photosystem II. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44(3):318-325.
49. Tourneux C., Devaux A., Camacho M.R., Mamani P., Ledent J.F. Effects of water shortage on six potato genotypes in the highlands of Bolivia (II): water relations, physiological parameters. Agronomie 2003, 23:180-190.
50. Ranalli P., Di Candilo M., Bagata M. Drought tolerance screening for potato improvement. Plant Breed. 1997, 11:290-292.
51. Rajendran K., Tester M., Roy S.J. Quantifying the three main components of salinity tolerance in cereals. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:237-249.
52. Rodriguez D., Sadras V.O., Christensen L.K., Belford R. A canopy stress index (CSI) to spatially assess the physiological status of wheat crops as affected by water and nitrogen supply. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2005, 56:983-993.
53. Borhan M., Panigrahi S., Lorenzen J., Gu H. Multispectral and color imaging techniques for nitrate and chlorophyll determination of potato leaves in a controlled environment. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2004, 47:599-608.
54. Johnson D.A., Asay K.H., Tieszen L.L., Ehleringer J.R., Jefferson P.G. Carbon isotope discrimination: potential in screening cool-season grasses for water-limited environments. Crop Sci. 1990, 30:338-343.
55. Monneveux P., et al. Relationship between grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination in bread wheat under four water regimes. Eur. J. Agron. 2005, 22:231-242.
56. Jefferies R.A. Physiological determinants of genotypic differences in carbon isotope discrimination in potato grown in well-watered conditions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1995, 127:585-592.
57. Jefferies R.A. Responses of potato genotypes to drought. I. Expansion of individual leaves and osmotic adjustment. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1993, 122:93-104.
58. Schafleitner R., Gaudin A., Gutierrez Rosales R.O., Alvarado Aliaga C.A., Bonierbale M. Proline accumulation and real time PCR expression analysis of genes encoding enzymes of proline metabolism in relation to drought tolerance in Andean potato. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2007, 29:19-26.
59. Kavi-Kishor P.B., et al. Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: Its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr. Sci. 2005, 88:424-438.
60. Lahlou O., Ledent J.F. Root mass and depth, stolons and roots formed on stolons in four cultivars of potato under water stress. Eur. J. Agron. 2005, 22:159-173.
61. Steckel J.R.A., Gray D. Drought tolerance in potatoes. J. Agric. Sci. 1979, 92:375-381.
62. Rossouw F.T., Waghmarae J. The effect of drought on growth and yield of two South African potato cultivars. S. Afr. J. Sci. 1995, 91:149-150.
63. Ekanayake I.J., Midmore D.J. Root-pulling resistance of potatoes in a drought environment. Am. Potato J. 1989, 66:519.
64. Iwama K. Physiology of the potato: new insights into root system and repercussions for crop management. Potato Res. 2008, 51:333-353.
65. Deguchi T., et al. Aboveground characteristics, yield potential and drought tolerance in "Konyu" potato cultivars with large root mass. Potato Res. 2010, 53:331-340.
66. Gabriel J., et al. Resistencia genética de híbridos de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.) al estrés hídrico por sequía. Rev. Latinoam. de la Papa 2012, 17:97-124.
67. Blum A. Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Res. 2009, 112:119-123.
68. Stark J.C., Pavek J.J., McCann I.R. Using canopy temperature measurements to evaluate drought tolerance of potato genotypes. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1991, 116:412-415.
69. Peñuelas J., Filella I. Visible and near-infrared reflectance techniques for diagnosing plant physiological status. Trends Plant Sci. 1998, 3:151-156.
70. François I.M., De Proft M. Reflectance indices indicative for changes in water contents of chicory leaves. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2005, 70:135-138.
71. Peñuelas J., Piñol J., Ogaya R., Filella I. Estimation of plant water concentration by the reflectance water index Wi (R900/R970). Int. J. Remote Sens. 1997, 18:2869-2875.
72. Clevers J.G.P.W. Application of a weighted infrared-red vegetation index for estimating leaf area index by correcting for soil moisture. Remote Sens. Environ. 1989, 2:25-37.
73. Espinoza N.O., et al. The potato: a model crop plant for tissue culture. Outlook Agric. 1986, 15:21-26.
74. Manoj K., Uday D. Gradient in vitro testing of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) genotypes by inducing water deficit: a new approach to screen germplasm for drought tolerance. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2007, 6:934-940.
75. Gopal J., Iwama K. In vitro screening of potato against water-stress mediated through sorbitol and polyethylene glycol. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26:693-700.
76. Gopal J., Iwama K., Jitsuyama Y. Effect of water stress mediated through agar on in vitro growth of potato. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2008, 44:221-228.
77. Jacomini E., Bertani A., Mapelli S. Accumulation of polyethylene glycol 6000 and its effects on water content and carbohydrate level in water-stressed tomato plant. Can. J. Bot. 1988, 66:970-973.
78. Yaniv Z., Werker E. Absorption and secretion of polyethylene glycol by Solanaceous plants. J. Exp. Bot. 1983, 34:1577-1584.
79. Fritz M., Ehwald R. Mannitol permeation and radial flow of water in maize roots. New Phytol. 2010, 188:210-217.
80. Lipavska H., Vreugdenhil D. Uptake of mannitol from the media by in vitro grown plants. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 1996, 45:103-107.
81. Bonierbale M.W., Plaisted R.L., Tanksley S.D. RFLP maps based on common set of clones reveal modes of chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics 1988, 120:1095-1103.
82. Gebhardt C., et al. RFLP analysis and linkage mapping in Solanum tuberosum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1989, 78:65-75.
83. Malosetti M., Visser R.G.F., Celis-Gamboa C., van Eeuwijk F.A. QTL methodology for response curves on the basis of non-linear mixed models, with an illustration to senescence in potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 113:288-300.
84. Fernandez-Del-Carmen A., Celis-Gamboa C., Visser R.G.F., Bachem C.W.B. Targeted transcript mapping for agronomic traits in potato. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:2761-2774.
85. Sliwka J., Wasilewicz-Flis I., Jakuczun H., Gebhardt C. Tagging quantitative trait loci for dormancy, tuber shape, regularity of tuber shape, eye depth and flesh colour in diploid potato originated from six Solanum species. Plant Breed. 2008, 127:49-55.
86. Bradshaw J.E., Hackett C.A., Pande B., Waugh R., Bryan G.J. QTL mapping of yield, agronomic and quality traits in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 116:193-211.
87. D'Hoop B.B., et al. Population structure and linkage disequilibrium unraveled in tetraploid potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121:1151-1170.
88. Anithakumari A.M., Dolstra O., Vosman B., Visser R.G.F., van der Linden G. In vitro screening and QTL analysis for drought tolerance in diploid potato. Euphytica 2011, 181:357-369.
89. Youm J.W., et al. Ectopic expression of pepper CaPF1 in potato enhances multiple stresses tolerance and delays initiation of in vitro tuberization. Planta 2008, 228:701-708.
90. Tang L., et al. Enhanced tolerance of transgenic potato plants overexpressing nucleoside diphosphate kinase 2 against multiple environmental stresses. Transgenic Res. 2008, 17:705-715.
91. Shin D., et al. Expression of StMYB1R-1, a novel potato single MYB-like domain transcription factor increases drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155:421-432.
92. Movahedi S., et al. Constitutive expression of Arabidopsis DREB1B in transgenic potato enhances drought and freezing tolerance. Biol. Plant. 2012, 56(1):37-42.
93. Knipp G., Honermeier B. Effect of water stress on proline accumulation of genetically modified potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) generating fructans. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163:392-397.
94. Stiller L., et al. Effects of drought on water content and photosynthetic parameters in potato plants expressing the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Planta 2008, 227:299-308.
95. Ahmad R., et al. Stress-induced expression of choline oxidase in potato plant chloroplasts confers enhanced tolerance to oxidative, salt, and drought stresses. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27(4):687-698.
96. Zhang N., et al. Enhanced drought and salinity tolerance in transgenic potato plants with a BADH gene from spinach. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2011, 5:71-77.
97. Muñiz García M.N., País S.M., Téllez-Iñón M.T., Capiati D.A. Characterization of StPPI1, a proton pump interactor from Solanum tuberosum L. that is up-regulated during tuber development and by abiotic stress. Planta 2011, 233:661-674.
98. Perl A., et al. Enhanced oxidative stress defense in transgenic potato expressing tomato Cu, Zn superoxide dismutases. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1993, 85(5):568-576.
99. Tang L., et al. Enhanced tolerance of transgenic potato plants expressing both superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in chloroplasts against oxidative stress and high temperature. Plant Cell Rep. 2006, 25:1380-1386.
100. Eltayeb A.E., et al. Transgenic potato overexpressing Arabidopsis cytosolic AtDHAR1 showed higher tolerance to herbicide, drought and salt stresses. Breed. Sci. 2011, 61:3-10.
101. Eltayeb A.E., et al. Greater protection against oxidative damages imposed by various environmental stresses in transgenic potato with higher level of reduced glutathione. Breed. Sci. 2010, 60:101-109.
102. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57:781-803.
103. Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Functional analysis of a NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC6 involved in abiotic and biotic stress-responsive gene expression in rice. Plant J. 2007, 51:617-630.
104. Taylor C. Proline and water deficit: ups, downs, ins, and outs. Plant Cell 1996, 8:1221-1224.
105. Close T.J. Dehydrins: a commonalty in the response of plants to dehydration and low temperature. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 100:291-296.
106. Koag M.C., Fenton R.D., Wilkens S., Close T.J. The binding of maize DNH1 to lipid vesicles. Gain of structure and lipid specificity. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131:309-316.
107. Allagulova C.R., Gimalov F.R., Shakirova F.M., Vakhitov V.A. The plant dehydrins: structure and putative functions. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2010, 68:945-951.
108. López C.G., Banowetz G.M., Peterson C.J., Kronstad W.E. Wheat dehydrin accumulation in response to drought stress during anthesis. Funct. Plant Biol. 2002, 29:1417-1425.
109. Rorat T., Irzykowski W., Grygorowicz W.J. Identification and isolation of novel cold induced genes in potato (Solanum sogarandinum). Plant Sci. 1997, 124:69-78.
110. Stockinger E.J., Gilmour S.J., Thomashow M.F. Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the C-repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA regulatory element that stimulates transcription in response to cold and water deficit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:1035-1040.
111. Liu Q., et al. Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transcription pathways in drought- and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1998, 10:1391-1406.
112. Ito Y., et al. Functional analysis of rice DREB1/CBF-type transcription factors involved in cold-responsive gene expression in transgenic rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47:141-153.
113. Pino M.T., et al. Use of a stress inducible promoter to drive ectopic AtCBF expression improves potato freezing tolerance while minimizing negative effects on tuber yield. Plant Biotechnol. 2007, 5:591-604.
114. Pino M.T., et al. Ectopic AtCBF1 over-expression enhances freezing tolerance and induces cold acclimation-associated physiological modifications in potato. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31:393-406.
115. Thomashow M.F. Molecular basis of plant cold acclimation: insights gained from studying the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:571-577.
116. Behnam B., et al. The Arabidopsis DREB1A gene driven by the stress-inducible rd29A promoter increases salt-stress tolerance in proportion to its copy number in tetrasomic tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum). Plant Biotechnol. 2006, 23:169-177.
117. Pennycooke J.C., et al. The low temperature-responsive, Solanum CBF1 genes maintain high identity in their upstream regions in a genomic environment undergoing gene duplications, deletions, and rearrangements. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67:483-497.
118. Carvallo M., et al. A comparison of the low temperature transcriptomes and CBF regulons of three plant species that differ in freezing tolerance-Solanum commersonii, Solanum tuberosum and Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:3807-3819.
119. Weisz R., Kaminski J., Smilowitz Z. Water-deficit effects on potato leaf growth and transpiration: utilizing fraction extractable soil-water for comparison with other crops. Am. Potato J. 1994, 71:829-840.
120. Hijmans R.J., Spooner D.M. Geographic distribution of wild potato species. Am. J. Bot. 2001, 88:2101-2112.
121. Ritter E., Ruiz de Galarreta J.I., van Eck H.J., Sanchez I. Construction of a potato transcriptome map based on the cDNA-AFLP technique. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 116:1003-1013.
122. Vacher J.J., García M. Uso consuntivo y comportamiento hídrico de la papa amarga (Solanum juzepczukii) y de la papa dulce (Solanum tuberosum spp. andigena) en el altiplano boliviano. La Papa Amarga 1992, 69-76. ORSTOM, La Paz. J. Rea, J.J. Vacher (Eds.).
123. Bedogni M.C., Capezio S., Huarte M. Comportamiento frente a estrés hídrico de variedades nativas y especies silvestres de papa. Rev. Latinoam. de la Papa 2009, 15:72-74.
124. Cabello R., Chujoy E., Mendiburu F., Bonierbale M., Monneveux P. Large-scale evaluation of potatoes improved varieties, pre-breeding material and landraces for drought tolerance. Am. J. Potato Res. 2012, 89:400-410.
125. Soto-Hernandez M., Larque Saavedra A. Abscisic acid accumulation in an edible drought resistant wild potato (Solanum cardiophylum). Phyton 1987, 2:69-71.
126. Coleman W.K. Evaluation of wild Solanum species for drought resistance: 1. Solanum gandarillasii Cardenas. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 62:221-230.
127. Kalazich J.C., Plaisted R.L. Association between trichrome characters and agronomic traits in Solanum tuberosum (L.)×S. berthaultii (Hawkes) hybrid. Am. Potato J. 1991, 68:833-847.
128. Reynolds M.P., Pask A.J.D., Mullan D.M. Physiological Breeding I: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Improve Crop Adaptation 2012, CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F., 188 p.
129. Burton W.G. The Potato, a Survey of its History and of Factors Influencing its Yield, Nutritive Value, Quantity and Storage 1966, H. Veeman & Zonen N.V, Wageningen, 382 p.
130. Burton W.G. Challenges for stress physiology in potato. Am. Potato J. 1981, 58:3-14.
131. Hyman G., et al. Strategic approaches to targeting technology generation: assessing the coincidence of poverty and drought-prone crop production. Agric. Syst. 2008, 98:50-61.
132. Li X., Waddington S.R., Dixon J., Joshi A.K., de Vicente C. The relative importance of drought and other water-related constraints for major food crops in South Asian farming systems. Food Secur. 2011, 3:19-33.
133. Reynolds M., Skovmand B., Trethowan R., Pfeiffer W. Evaluating a conceptual model for drought tolerance. Molecular Approaches for the Genetic Improvement of Cereals for Stable Production in Water-Limited Environments 2000, 49-53. CIMMYT, Mexico. J.M. Ribaut, S.D. Poland (Eds.).
134. Edmeades G.O., Bolaños J., Chapman S.C., Lafitte H.R., Bänziger M. Selection improves drought tolerance in tropical maize populations. I. Gains in biomass, grain yield and harvest index. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:1306-1315.
135. Havaux M. Rapid photosynthetic adaptation to heat stress triggered in potato leaves by moderately elevated temperatures. Plant Cell Environ. 1993, 16:461-467.
136. Lopes M.S., Reynolds M.P. Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37:147-156.
137. Erdem T., Erdem Y., Orta A.H., Okursoy H. Water-yield relationships of potato under different irrigation methods and regimens. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba Brazil) 2006, 63:226-231.
138. Prasad B. Spectral Reflectance Indices in Wheat Breeding 2008, VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken, Germany, 112 p.
139. Shrestha S., Brueck H., Asch F. Chlorophyll index, photochemical reflectance index and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements of rice leaves supplied with different N levels. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 2012, 113:7-13.
140. CIP, Annual report, CIP, Lima, Peru, 2010, 121 p.
141. Ghislain M., Núñez J., Herrera M., Pignataro J., Guzman F., Bonierbale M., Spooner D. Robust and highly informative microsatellite-based genetic identity kit for potato. Mol. Breed. 2009, 23:377-388.
142. Spooner D.M., Hijmans R.J. Potato systematics and germplasm collecting, 1989-2000. Am. J. Potato Res. 2001, 78:237-268.
143. Pavek J., Corsini D.L. Utilization of potato genetic resources in variety of development. Am. J. Potato Res. 2001, 78:433-441.
144. Iovene M., Barone A., Frusciante L., Monti L. Selection for aneuploid potato hybrids combining a low wild genome content and resistance traits from S. commersonii. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109:1139-1146.
145. Mujeeb-Kazi A. Utilization of Genetic Resources for Bread Wheat Improvement 2006, CRC, series, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 61-97.
146. van Ginkel M., Ogbonnaya F. Novel genetic diversity from synthetic wheats in breeding cultivars for changing production conditions. Field Crops Res. 2007, 104:86-94.
147. Visser R.G.F., et al. Sequencing the potato genome: outline and first results to come from the elucidation of the sequence of the world's third most important food crop. Am. J. Potato Res. 2009, 86:417-429.
148. Kloosterman B., et al. Genes driving potato tuber initiation and growth: identification based on transcriptional changes using the POCI array. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2008, 8:329-340.
149. Jenkins M.T. Corn improvement. Yearbook of Agriculture 1936, 1936, Government Printing Office, USDA, Washington, DC. H.A. Wallace (Ed.).
150. Monneveux P., Sanchez C., Beck D., Edmeades G.O. Drought tolerance improvement in tropical maize source populations: evidence of progress. Crop Sci. 2006, 46:180-191.
151. Ribaut J.M., Betran J., Monneveux P., Setter T. Drought tolerance in maize. Handbook of Maize: Its Biology 2009, 311-344. Springer, New York. J.L. Bennetzen, S.C. Hake (Eds.).
152. Hobbs P.R., Sayre K., Gupta R. The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 2008, 363:543-555.
153. Derpsch R., Friedrich T. Global overview of conservation agriculture adoption. Proceedings, Lead Papers, 4th World Congress on Conservation Agriculture 2009, 429-438.
154. Sayre K., Hobbs P. The raised-bed system of cultivation for irrigated production conditions. Sustainable Agriculture and the Rice-Wheat system 2004, 337-355. Ohio State University, Columbia, USA. P. Lal, P. Hobbs, N. Uphoff, D.O. Hansen (Eds.).
155. Ratnadass A., Fernandes P., Avelino J., Habib R. Plant species diversity for sustainable management of crop pests and diseases in agroecosystems: a review. Agron. Sust. Dev. 2012, 32:273-303.
156. Ghaffari A., Cook H.F., Lee H.C. Climate change and winter wheat management: a modelling scenario for South-Eastern England. Climatic Change 2002, 55:509-533.
157. Singh J.P., Lal S.S., Govindakrishnan P.M., Dua V.K., Pandey S.K. Impact of climate change on potato in India. Challenges of Climate Change-India Horticulture 2009, 90-99. Westville Publishing House, New Delhi. H.P. Singh, J.P. Singh, S.S. Lal (Eds.).
158. Tardieu F. Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: just design the right drought scenario. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63:25-31.
159. Dolferus R., Xuemei J.I., Richards R.A. Abiotic stress and control of grain number in cereals. Plant Sci. 2011, 181:331-341.
160. Parent B., Turc O., Gibon Y., Stitt M., Tardieu F. Modelling temperature-compensated physiological rates, based on the co-ordination of responses to temperature of developmental processes. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:2057-2069.
161. Richner W., Liedgens M., Bürgi H., Soldati A., Stamp P. Root image analysis and interpretation. Root Methods A Handbook 2000, 305-342. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. A.L. Smit, A.G. Bengough, C. Engels, M. van Noordwijk, S.S.C. Pellerin (Eds.).
162. Shashidhar H.E., Henry A., Hardy B. Methodologies for Root Drought Studies in Rice 2012, International Rice Research Institute, Philippines, p. 65.
163. Berger B., Parent B., Tester M. High-throughput shoot imaging to study drought responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:3519-3528.
164. Berke J., Polgar Z., Horvath Z., Nagy T. Developing on exact quality and classification system for plant improvement. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 2006, 12(9):1154-1164.
165. Trewavas A. What is plant behaviour. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:606-616.
166. Bruce J.A., Matthes M.C., Napier J.A., Pickett J.A., Stressful Stressful 'memories' of plants: evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Sci. 2007, 173:603-608.