Expertise in Assessing and Managing Risk of Violence the Contribution of Naturalistic Decision Making

Informed by Knowledge Expert Performance in Complex Situations

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 313-328

  Falzer, Paul R ^a  

^a Clinical Epidemiology Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874395840     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203847985     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Arkes, H. R., & Mellers, B. A. (2002). Do juries meet our expectations? Law and Human Behavior, 26(6), 625–639.
2. Beach, L. R. (1992). Epistemic strategies: Causal thinking in expert and nonexpert judgment. In G. Wright & F. Bolger (Eds.), Expertise and decision support (pp. 107–127). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
3. Beach, L. R. (2009). Narrative thinking and decision making (online monograph). Retrieved April 12, 2009, from http://leeroybeach.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/narrative.pdf
4. Beach, L. R. (Ed.). (1998). Image theory: Theoretical and empirical foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Beach, L. R., & Lipshitz, R. (1993). Why classical decision theory is an inappropriate standard for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1987). Image theory: Principles, goals, and plans in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 66(3), 201–220.
7. Beach, L. R., & Potter, R. E. (1992). The pre-choice screening of options. Acta Psychologica, 81(2), 115–126.
8. Bornstein, B. H., & Emler, A. C. (2001). Rationality in medical decision making: A review of the literature on doctors’ decision-making biases. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(2), 97–107.
9. Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2000). Manual for the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.
10. Borum, R., Bartel, P. A., & Forth, A. E. (2005). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth. In T. Grisso, G. Vincent, & D. Seagrave (Eds.), Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice (pp. 311–323). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
11. Borum, R., & Otto, R. (2000). Advances in forensic assessment and treatment: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 1–7.
12. Buchanan, A. (2008). Risk of violence by psychiatric patients: Beyond the “actuarial versus clinical” assessment debate. Psychiatric Services, 59(2), 184–190.
13. Chapman, J. F., Desai, R. A., Falzer, P. R., & Borum, R. (2006). Violence risk and race in a sample of youth in juvenile detention: The potential to reduce disproportionate minority confinement. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 170–184.
14. Cook, N. R. (2007). Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation, 115(7), 928–935.
15. Cottle, C. C., Lee, R. J., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(3), 367.
16. Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243(4899), 1668–1674.
17. Douglas, K. S. (2004). Making structured clinical decisions about violence risk: Reliability and validity of the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme. Vancouver, British Columbia: Simon Fraser University.
18. Douglas, K. S., & Skeem, J. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(3), 347–383.
19. Dunegan, K. J. (1995). Image theory: Testing the role of image compatibility in progress decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(1), 79–86.
20. Ellsworth, P. C. (2004). Legal reasoning. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Elstein, A. S. (1999). Heuristics and biases: Selected errors in clinical reasoning. Academic Medicine, 74(7), 791–794.
22. Falzer, P. R. (2004). Cognitive schema and naturalistic decision making in evidence-based practice. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 37(2), 86–98.
23. Falzer, P. R., Moore, B. A., & Garman, D. M. (2008). Incorporating clinical guidelines through clinician decision making. Implementation Science, 3(13).
24. Fischhoff, B., & Johnson, S. (1997). The possibility of distributed decision making. In Z. Shapira (Ed.), Organizational decision making (pp. 217–237). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Goldberg, L. R. (1967). Research on the clinical judgment process. Anthropology and Medicine, 15(4–5), 220–242.
26. Gottfredson, D. M., & Snyder, H. N. (2005). The mathematics of risk classification: Changing data into valid instruments for juvenile courts (No. NCJ 209158). Washington, DC: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
27. Gottfredson, S. D., & Moriarty, L. J. (2006). Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 178–200.
28. Grisso, T. (1998). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
29. Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 293–323.
30. Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19–30.
31. Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. L., & Wistrich, A. J. (2000). Inside the judicial mind. Cornell Law Review, 86, 777–830.
32. Hamann, J., Langer, B., Winkler, V., Busch, R., Cohen, R., Leucht, S., Kissling, W. (2006). Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 114(4), 265–273.
33. Hammond, K. R. (2000). Coherence and correspondence theories in judgment and decision making. In T. Connolly, H. R. Arkes, & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (2nd ed., pp. 53–65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Hanson, R. K. (1998). What do we know about sex offender risk assessment? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(1–2), 50–72.
35. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20(4), 315–335.
36. Hart, S. D. (2008). Preventing violence: The role of risk assessment and management. In A. C. Baldry & F. W. Winkel (Eds.), Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: The risk assessment and management approach (pp. 7–18). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
37. Hastie, R. (2001). Problems of judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 653–683.
38. Heilbrun, K. (1997). Prediction versus management models relevant to risk assessment: The importance of legal decision-making context. Law and Human Behavior, 21(4), 347–359.
39. Heilbrun, K., O’Neill, M. L., Strohman, L. K., Bowman, Q., & Philipson, J. (2000). Expert approaches to communicating violence risk. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 137–148.
40. Hilton, N. Z., & Simmons, J. L. (2001). The influence of actuarial risk assessment in clinical judgments and tribunal decisions about mentally disordered offenders in maximum security. Law and Human Behavior, 25(4), 393–408.
41. Jahng, K. H., Martin, L. R., Golin, C. E., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2005). Preferences for medical collaboration: Patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 57(3), 308–314.
42. Jessor, R., Van Den Bos, J., Vanderryn, J., Costa, F. M., & Turbin, M. S. (1995). Protective factors in adolescent problem behavior: Moderator effects and developmental change. Developmental Psychology 31(6), 923–933.
43. Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review, 50(5), 1471–1550.
44. Klein, G. A. (1993). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decison making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138–147). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
45. Kleinmuntz, B. (1990). Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: Toward an integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin, 107(3), 296–310.
46. Lassiter, G. D. (2002). Illusory causation in the courtroom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(6), 204–208.
47. Lodewijks, H. P., Doreleijers, T. A., & de Ruiter, C. (2008). SAVRY risk assessment in violent Dutch adolescents: Relation to sentencing and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(6), 696–709.
48. Marczyk, G. R., Heilbrun, K., Lander, T., & DeMatteo, D. (2003). Predicting juvenile recidivism with the PCL:YV, MAYSI, and YLS/CMI. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2(1), 7–18.
49. McEachran, A. (2001). The predictive validity of the PCL-YV and the SAVRY in a population of adolescent offenders. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC.
50. Meehl, P. E. (1986). Causes and effects of my disturbing little book. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(3), 370–375.
51. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
52. Monahan, J. (1981). The clinical prediction of violent behavior. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
53. Monahan, J. (1997). Actuarial support for the clinical assessment of violence risk. International Review of Psychiatry, 9(2–3), 167–169.
54. Monahan, J. (2003). Violence risk assessment in American law. In P. J. van Koppen & S. D. Penrod (Eds.), Adversarial versus inquisitorial justice: Psychological perspectives on criminal justice systems (pp. 81–89). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
55. Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Appelbaum, P. S., Grisso, T., Mulvey, E. P., Roth, L. H., Silver, E. (2006). The classification of violence risk. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24(6), 721–730.
56. Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., Silver, E., Grisso, T. (2000). Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 312–319.
57. Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Robbins, P. C., Appelbaum, P., Banks, S., Grisso, T., Silver, E. (2005). An actuarial model of violence risk assessment for persons with mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 56(7), 810–815.
58. Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Applebaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P. Banks S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59. Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 783–792.
60. Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(4), 329–353.
61. Orasanu, J. (2005). Crew collaboration in space: A naturalistic decision-making perspective. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 76(6, Sect. 2, Suppl.), B154–B163.
62. Otto, R. (1992). The prediction of dangerous behavior: A review and analysis of ‘second generation’ research. Forensic Reports, 5(1), 103–133.
63. Otto, R. K. (2000). Assessing and managing violence risk in outpatient settings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(10), 1239–1262.
64. Patel, V. L., Kaufman, D. R., & Arocha, J. F. (2002). Emerging paradigms of cognition in medical decision-making. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 35(1), 52–75.
65. Pepe, M. S., Feng, Z., Huang, Y., Longton, G., Prentice, R., Thompson, I. M., & Zheng, Y. (2008). Integrating the predictiveness of a marker with its performance as a classifier. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167(3), 362–368.
66. Rapley, T. (2008). Distributed decision making: The anatomy of decisions-in-action. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30(3), 429–444.
67. Rennie, C., & Dolan, M. (2005). Validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) in UK Adolescents. Paper presented at the International Association for Forensic Mental Health Services, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
68. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620.
69. Simon, D. (1998). A psychological model of judicial decision making. Rutgers Law Journal, 30(1).
70. Simon, H. A. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. American Economic Review, 68(2), 1–16.
71. Svenson, O. (1990). Some propositions for the classification of decision situations. In K. Borcherding, O. I. Larichev, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Contemporary issues in decision making (pp. 17–32). New York, NY: North-Holland.
72. Swanson, J. W. (2008). Preventing the unpredicted: Managing violence risk in mental health care. Psychiatric Services, 59(2), 191–193.
73. Webster, C., Douglas, K., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (Version 2). Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia.
74. Webster, C. D., Muller-Isberner, R., & Fransson, G. (2002). Violence risk assessment: Using structured clinical guides professionally. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1(2), 185–193.
75. Wong, S. C. P., & Gordon, A. (2006). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale: A treatment-friendly violence risk assessment tool. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12(3), 279–309.