Organizations and collective obligations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1873, Issue , 2000, Pages 302-311

  Royakkers, Lambèr ^a   Dignum, Frank ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COMPUTATION THEORY; EXPERT SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

COLLECTIVE COMMITMENT; COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEM; DEONTIC LOGIC; DISTRIBUTED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INDIVIDUAL AGENT;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84874385301     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44469-6_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Carmo, J. and O. Pacheco, Deontic and action logics for collective agency and roles, in: R. Demolombe and R. Hilpinen (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, Toulouse, pp. 93-124, 2000.
2. Castelfranchi, C., Commitments: Prom Individual Intentions to Groups and Or­ganizations, in: V. Lesser (editor), Proceedings First International Conference on Multi-Agent System,s., AAAI-Press and MIT Press, San Francisco, pp. 41-48, 1995.
3. Castelfranchi, C. and R. Falcone, Towards a theory of delegation for agent-based systems, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24, pp. 141-157, 1998.
4. Conte, R., and C. Castelfranchi, Cognitive and Social Action, UCL Press, London, 1995.
5. Dunin-Kęplicz, B., and R. Verbrugge, Collective Commitments, in: M. Tokora (ed­itor), Proceedings Second International Conference on Multi-Agent System,s., Cali­fornia, AAAI-Press, pp. 56-63, 1996.
6. Gasser, L., Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systems semantics, Artificial Intelligence 47, pp. 107-138, 1991.
7. Gilbert, M., On, Social Facts, Princeton, 1992.
8. Gilbert, M., Obligation and joint commitment, Utilitas 11, no. 2, pp., 1999.
9. Hansson, B., Deontic Logic and Different Levels of Generality, Theoria 36, pp. 241-248, 1970.
10. Herrestad, H. and C. Krogh, Deontic Logic Relativised to Bearers and Counter­parties, in: J. Bing and O. Torvund (editors), Anniversary Anthology in Computer and Law, COMPLEX - TANO, pp. 453-522, 1995.
11. Hilpinen, R., On the Semantics of Personal Directives, Ajatus 35, pp. 140-157, 1973.
12. Kordig, C.R., Relativised Deontic Modalities, in: A.R. Anderson et al (editors), The Logical Enterprise, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 221-257, 1975.
13. Levesque, J.H., P.R. Cohen and J.H. Nunes, On acting tgether, in: Proceedings of AAAI-90, Menlo Park, California, American Association for Artificial Intelligence Inc, 1990.
14. Pörn, I., The Logic of Power, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1970.
15. Rao, A., and M. Georgeff, Modelling rational agents within a BDI-architecture, in: R. Fikes and E. Sandewall (editors), Proceedings of the Second Conference on, Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufman, pp. 473-484, 1991.
16. Rescher, N., The Logic of Commands, Dover, New York, 1966.
17. Royakkers, L.M.M., Extending deontic logic for the formalisation of legal rules, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998.
18. Royakkers, L.M.M. and F. Dignum, From collective to individual obligations, in: Proceedings of The Lavj in the Inform,ation Society, Florence, Instituto per la documentazione giuridica del CNR, pp. 1008-1022, 1998.
19. Santos, F., A.J.I. Jones and J. Carmo, Responsibility for action in organizations: a formal model, in: G. Holstrom-Hintikka and R. Tuomela (eds.), Contemporary Ac­tion Theory, Vol 2 (Social Action), Synthese Library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 333-350, 1997.
20. Singh, M.P., Multiagent Systems: A theoretical Framework for intentions, know­how, and communication, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 799, Berlin, Springer, 1995.
21. Vogel Carey, T., How to confuse commitment with obligation, The Journal of Philosophy, pp. 276-284, 1975.