Erratum: A sub-Mercury-sized exoplanet (Nature (2013) 494 (452-454) DOI: 10.1038/nature11914);A sub-Mercury-sized exoplanet

Nature

Volumn 494, Issue 7438, 2013, Pages 452-454

  Barclay, Thomas ^a,b   Rowe, Jason F ^a,c   Lissauer, Jack J ^a   Huber, Daniel ^a   Fressin, François ^d   Howell, Steve B ^a   Bryson, Stephen T ^a   Chaplin, William J ^e   Désert, Jean Michel ^d   Lopez, Eric D ^f   Marcy, Geoffrey W ^g   Mullally, Fergal ^a,c   Ragozzine, Darin ^d,h   Torres, Guillermo ^d   Adams, Elisabeth R ^d   Agol, Eric ⁱ   Barrado, David ^j,k   Basu, Sarbani ^l   Bedding, Timothy R ^m   Buchhave, Lars A ^n,o   Charbonneau, David ^d   Christiansen, Jessie L ^a,c   Christensen Dalsgaard, Jørgen ^p   Ciardi, David ^q   Cochran, William D ^r   Dupree, Andrea K ^d   Elsworth, Yvonne ^e   Everett, Mark ^s   Fischer, Debra A ^l   Ford, Eric B ^h   Fortney, Jonathan J ^f   Geary, John C ^d   Haas, Michael R ^a   Handberg, Rasmus ^p   Hekker, Saskia ^e,t   Henze, Christopher E ^a   Horch, Elliott ^u   Howard, Andrew W ^v   Hunter, Roger C ^a   Isaacson, Howard ^g   Jenkins, Jon M ^a,c   Karoff, Christoffer ^p   Kawaler, Steven D ^w   Kjeldsen, Hans ^p   Klaus, Todd C ^a   Latham, David W ^d   Li, Jie ^a,c   Lillo Box, Jorge ^k   Lund, Mikkel N ^p   Lundkvist, Mia ^p   Metcalfe, Travis S ^x   Miglio, Andrea ^e   Morris, Robert L ^a,c   Quintana, Elisa V ^a,c   Stello, Dennis ^m   Smith, Jeffrey C ^a,c   Still, Martin ^a,b   Thompson, Susan E ^a,c   more..

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b BAY AREA ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c SETI INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d HARVARD SMITHSONIAN CENTER FOR ASTROPHYSICS   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h University of Florida   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^j CENTRO ASTRONÓMICO HISPANO ALEMÁN   (Spain)

^k CENTRO DE ASTROBIOLOGÍA CSIC INTA   (Spain)

^l YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^o UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^p AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^q CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^r UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^s NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY   (United States)

^t UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^u SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^v UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^w IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^x White Dwarf Research Corporation   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WATER;

EARTH; IRRADIANCE; ORBIT DETERMINATION; PLANETARY SURFACE; SIZE STRUCTURE; SOLAR SYSTEM;

ARTICLE; ASTRONOMY; ATMOSPHERE; IRRADIATION; MOON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUN;

EID: 84874381458     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12067     Document Type: Erratum

References (30)

1. Mayor, M.& Queloz, D. A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star. Nature 378, 355-359 (1995).
2. Marcy, G. & Butler, R. P. A planetary companion to 70 Virginis. Astrophys. J. 464, L147-L151 (1996).
3. Fabrycky, D. C. et al. Architecture of Kepler's multi-transiting systems: II. New investigations with twice asmany candidates. Astrophys. J. (submitted); preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.6328 (2012).
4. Howard, A. W. et al. The occurrence andmass distribution of close-in super-Earths, Neptunes, and Jupiters. Science 330, 653-655 (2010).
5. Howard, A. W. et al. Planet occurrence within 0.25 AU of solar-type stars from Kepler. Astrophys. J. 201 (suppl.), 15 (2012).
6. Fressin, F. et al. Two Earth-sized planets orbiting Kepler-20. Nature 482, 195-198 (2011).
7. Muirhead, P. S. et al. Characterizing the cool KOIs. III. KOI 961: a small star with large proper motion and three small planets. Astrophys. J. 747, 144 (2012).
8. Archinal, B. A. et al. Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2009. Celestial Mech. Dyn. Astron. 109, 101-135 (2011).
9. Borucki, W. J. et al. Kepler planet-detection mission: introduction and first results. Science 327, 977-980 (2010).
10. Koch, D. G. et al. Kepler mission design, realized photometric performance, and early science. Astrophys. J. 713, L79-L86 (2010).
11. Batalha, N. M. et al. Planetary candidates observed byKepler, III: analysis of the first 16 months of data. Astrophys. J. Suppl. (in the press); preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.5852 (2012).
12. Ammons, S. M. et al. The N2K Consortium. IV. New temperatures and metallicities for more than 100,000 FGK dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 638, 1004-1017 (2006).
13. Valenti, J. A.&Fischer, D. A. Spectroscopic properties of cool stars (SPOCS). I.1040 F, G, and K dwarfs from Keck, Lick, and AAT planet search programs. Astrophys. J. 159 (suppl.), 141-166 (2005).
14. Buchhave, L. A. et al. An abundance of small exoplanets around stars with a wide range of metallicities. Nature 486, 375-377 (2012).
15. Kjeldsen, H. & Bedding, T. R.Amplitudes of stellar oscillations: the implications for asteroseismology. Astron. Astrophys. 293, 87-106 (1995).
16. Ulrich, R. K.Determination of stellar ages fromasteroseismology. Astrophys. J. 306, L37-L40 (1986).
17. Mandel, K. & Agol, E. Analytic light curves for planetary transit searches. Astrophys. J. 580, L171-L175 (2002).
18. Ford, E. B. Quantifying the uncertainty in the orbits of extrasolar planets. Astron. J. 129, 1706-1717 (2005).
19. Struve, O. Proposal for a project of high-precision stellar radial velocity work. Observatory 72, 199-200 (1952).
20. Holman, M. J. & Murray, N. W. The use of transit timing to detect terrestrial-mass extrasolar planets. Science 307, 1288-1291 (2005).
21. Torres, G., Konacki, M., Sasselov, D. D. & Jha, S. Testing blend scenarios for extrasolar transiting planet candidates. I.OGLE-TR-33: a falsepositive. Astrophys. J. 614, 979-989 (2004).
22. Torres, G. et al. Modeling Kepler transit light curves as false positives: rejection of blend scenarios for Kepler-9, and validation of Kepler-9 d, a superearth-size planet in a multiple system. Astrophys. J. 727, 24 (2011).
23. Fressin, F. et al. Kepler-10c, a 2.2-Earth radius transiting planet in a multiple system. Astrophys. J. 197 (suppl.), 5 (2011).
24. Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E. & Esquerdo, G. A. Kepler Input Catalog: photometric calibration and stellar classification. Astron. J. 142, 112 (2011).
25. Fressin, F. et al. The false positive rate of Kepler and the occurrence of planets. Astrophys. J. (in the press); preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1301. 0842 (2013).
26. Cochran, W. D. et al. Kepler-18b, c, and d: a systemof three planets confirmed by transit timing variations, light curve validation, warm-Spitzer photometry, and radial velocity measurements. Astrophys. J. 197, 7 (2011).
27. Lissauer, J. J. et al. Architecture and dynamics of Kepler's candidate multiple transiting planet systems. Astrophys. J. 197 (suppl.), 8 (2011).
28. Lissauer, J. J. et al. Almost all of Kepler's multiple planet candidates are planets. Astrophys. J. 750, 112 (2012).
29. Chambers, J. in Exoplanets (ed. Seager, S.) 297-317 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2011).
30. Borucki, W. J. et al. in Earths: DARWIN/TPF and the Search for Extrasolar Terrestrial Planets. Report No. ESA SP-539, 69-81 (ESA Publications Division, 2003).