There is no paradox with PPI in research

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 186-187

  Staley, Kristina ^a  

^a TwoCan Associates   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; NOTE; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLIC OPINION;

COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLIC OPINION;

EID: 84874379934     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100512     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Ives J, Damery S, Redwood S. PPI, paradoxes and Plato: who's sailing the ship? J Med Ethics. Published Online First: 20 January 2012. doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100150.
2. Staley K. Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh, UK: Involve, 2009.
3. Elliott E, Watson A, Harries U. Harnessing expertise: involving peer interviewers in qualitative research with hard-to-reach populations. Health Expect 2002;5:172-8.
4. Miller E, Cook A, Alexander H, et al. Challenges and strategies in collaborative working with service user researchers: Reflections from the academic researcher. Res Policy Plann 2006;24:197-208.
5. Bengtsson-Tops A, Svensson B. Mental health users' experiences of being interviewed by another user in a research project. A qualitative study. J Ment Health 2010;19:237-42.
6. Bryant L, Beckett J. The practicality and acceptability of an advocacy service in the emergency department for people attending following self-harm. Leeds, UK: University of Leeds, 2006.
7. Dewar B. Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research-a framework for future development and understanding. J Clin Nurs 2005;14:48-53.