Husserl’s relapse? concerning a fregean challenge to phenomenology

Inquiry (United Kingdom)

Volumn 42, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 343-369

  Martin, Wayne M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874359974     PISSN: 0020174X     EISSN: 15023923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002017499321444     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brentano, Franz 1874. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Citations refer to translation by L. McAlister et al. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973.
2. Dummett, Michael 1981. ‘Idealism’, in The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. London: Duckworth, pp. 56-73.
3. Dummett, Michael 1990. ‘Thought and Perception: The Views of Two Philosophical Innovators’, in D. Bell and N. Cooper (eds), The Analytic Tradition: Meaning, Thought and Knowledge. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 83-103.
4. Dummett, Michael 1993. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. London: Duckworth.
5. Follesdal, Dagfinn 1969. ‘Husserl’s Notion of Noema’, Journal of Philosophy 66, 680-687.
6. Follesdal, Dagfinn 1972. ‘An Introduction to Phenomenology for Analytic Philosophers’, in R. Olson and A. Paul (eds), Contemporary Philosophy in Scandinavia. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 417-429.
7. Frege, Gottlob 1892. ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’. Citations refer to translation by M. Black, ‘On Sense and Reference’, in P. Geach and M. Black (eds), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, 1952, pp. 56-78.
8. Frege, Gottlob 1897. ‘Logik'. Citations refer to translation by P. Long and R. White: ‘Logic’, in H. Hermes et al. (eds), Posthumous Writings: Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979, pp. 126-151.
9. Frege, Gottlob 1918. ‘Der Gedanke’. Citations refer to translation by P. Geach and R. H. Stoothoff, ‘Thoughts’, in B. McGuinness (ed.), Frege: Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984, pp. 351-372.
10. Husserl, Edmund 1900-1901. Logische Untersuchungen. Citations refer to translation by J. N. Findlay, Logical Investigations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970.
11. Husserl, Edmund 1911. ‘Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft’. Citations refer to translation by Q. Lauer, ‘Philosophy as Rigorous Science’, in Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. New York: Harper, 1965, pp. 71-147.
12. Husserl, Edmund 1913. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Citations refer to translation by R. Boyce-Gibson, Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1931.
13. Husserl, Edmund 1925. Phenomenologische Psychologie: Vorlesungen Sommer semester 1925. Citations refer to translation by J. Scanlon, Phenomenological Psychology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1977.
14. Kusch, Martin 1995. Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15. Martin, Wayne 1997. Idealism and Objectivity: Understanding Fichte’s Jena Project. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Philipse, Herman 1995. ‘Transcendental Idealism’, in D. W. Smith and B. Smith (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239-322.
17. Smith, Barry 1989. ‘On the Origins of Analytic Philosophy’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 25, 153-173.
18. Smith, Barry 1994. ‘Husserl’s Theory of Meaning and Reference’, in L. Haaparanta (ed.), Mind, Meaning and Mathematics. The Hague: Kluwer, pp. 163-183.
19. Smith, David Woodruff and McIntyre, Ronald 1982. Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning and Language. Dordrecht: Reidel.
20. Willard, Dallas 1972. ‘The Paradox of Logical Psychologism: Husserl’s Way Out’, Philosophical Review 9, 94-100.
21. Willard, Dallas 1984. Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge: A Study in Husserl’s Early Philosophy. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.