Size-selective fishing affects sex ratios and the opportunity for sexual selection in Alaskan sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka

Oikos

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 411-420

  Kendall, Neala W ^a   Quinn, Thomas P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREEDING POPULATION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FISHING EFFORT; HARVESTING; SALMONID FISHERY; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIZE SELECTION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WILD POPULATION;

ALASKA; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS NERKA; PISCES;

EID: 84874287288     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20319.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allendorf F. W. and Hard J. J. 2009. Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 9987-9994.
2. Anderson J. H. et al. 2010. Selection on breeding date and body size in colonizing coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Mol. Ecol. 19: 2562-2573.
3. Beacham T. D. and Murray C. B. 1985. Variation in length and body depth of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum salmon (O. keta) in southern British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42: 312-319.
4. Berejikian B. A. et al. 2000. Female mate choice and spawning behaviour of chinook salmon under experimental conditions. J. Fish Biol. 57: 647-661.
5. Berglund A. 1997. Mating systems and sex allocation. - In: Godin J.-G. J. (ed.), Behavioural ecology of teleost fishes. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 237-265.
6. Blair G. R. et al. 1993. Variation in life history characteristics and morphology of sockeye salmon in the Kvichak River system, Bristol Bay, Alaska. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 122: 550-559.
7. Bunnell D. B. et al. 2012. Exploring mechanisms enderlying sex-specific differences in mortality of Lake Michigan bloaters. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 141: 204-214.
8. Carlson S. M. and Seamons T. R. 2008. A review of quantitative genetic components of fitness in salmonids: implications for adaptation to future change. Evol. Appl. 1: 222-238.
9. Clutton-Brock T. 2007. Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318: 1882-1885.
10. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. - Erlbaum.
11. Coltman D. W. et al. 2003. Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426: 655-658.
12. Darimont C. T. et al. 2009. Human predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wild. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 952-954.
13. Doctor K. et al. 2010. Spatial and temporal patterns of upriver migration by sockeye salmon populations in the Wood River System, Bristol Bay, Alaska. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 139: 80-91.
14. Fenberg P. B. and Roy K. 2008. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know? Mol. Ecol. 17: 209-220.
15. Fleming I. A. and Gross M. R. 1994. Breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 48: 637-657.
16. Fleming I. A. and Reynolds J. D. 2004. Salmonid breeding systems. - In: Hendry A. P. and Stearns S. C. (eds), Evolution illuminated: salmon and their relatives. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 264-294.
17. Foote C. J. 1989. Female mate preference in Pacific salmon. Anim. Behav. 38: 721-722.
18. Ginsberg J. R. and Milner-Gulland E. J. 1994. Sex-biased harvesting and population-dynamics in ungulates - implications for conservation and sustainable use. Conserv. Biol. 8: 157-166.
19. Heard W. R. 1991. Life history of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha). - In: Groot C. and Margolis L. (eds), Pacific salmon life histories. Univ. of British Columbia Press, pp. 119-230.
20. Heppell S. S. et al. 2006. Models to compare management options for a protogynous fish. Ecol. Appl. 16: 238-249.
21. Hilborn R. et al. 2003. Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100: 6564-6568.
22. Holand Ø. et al. 2006. Adaptive adjustment of offspring sex ratio and maternal reproductive effort in an iteroparous mammal. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 293-299.
23. Holtby L. B. and Healey M. C. 1990. Sex-specific life history tactics and risk-taking in coho salmon. Ecology 71: 678-690.
24. Hutchings J. A. and Fraser D. J. 2008. The nature of fisheries- and farming-induced evolution. Mol. Ecol. 17: 294-313.
25. Jennings S. et al. 2001. Marine fisheries ecology. - Blackwell.
26. Jones M. W. and Hutchings J. A. 2001. The influence of male parr body size and mate competition on fertilization success and effective population size in Atlantic salmon. Heredity 86: 675-684.
27. Jørgensen C. et al. 2007. Managing evolving fish stocks. Science 318: 1247-1248.
28. Keenleyside M. H. A. and Dupuis H. M. C. 1988. Courting and spawning competition in pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha). Can. J. Zool. 66: 262-265.
29. Kendall N. W. and Quinn T. P. 2009. Effects of population-specific variation in age and length on fishery selection and exploitation rates of sockeye salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 66: 896-908.
30. Kendall N. W. and Quinn T. P. 2012. Comparative size-selectivity among Alaskan sockeye salmon fisheries: implications for harvest-induced evolution. Ecol. Appl. 22: 804-816.
31. Kendall N. W. et al. 2009. Quantifying six decades of fishery selection for size and age at maturity in sockeye salmon. Evol. Appl. 2: 523-536.
32. Kokko H. et al. 2001. Life histories and sustainable harvesting. - In: Reynolds J. D. et al. (eds), Conservation of exploited species. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 301-322.
33. Kuparinen A. and Merilä J. 2007. Detecting and managing fisheries-induced evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 652-659.
34. Mathisen O. A. 1962. The effect of altered sex ratios on the spawning of red salmon. - In: Koo T. S. Y. (ed.), Studies of Alaska red salmon. Univ. of Washington Press, pp. 137-246.
35. McCleave J. D. and Jellyman D. J. 2004. Male dominance in the New Zealand longfin eel population of a New Zealand river: probable causes and implications for management. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 24: 490-505.
36. Milner-Gulland E. J. et al. 2003. Reproductive collapse in saiga antelope harems. Nat. Rev. Genet. 422: 135.
37. Milner J. M. et al. 2007. Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores. Conserv. Biol. 21: 36-47.
38. Morbey Y. 2000. Protandry in Pacific salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: 1252-1257.
39. Platten J. R. et al. 2002. The influence of increased line-fishing mortality on the sex ratio and age of sex reversal of the venus tusk fish. J. Fish Biol. 60: 301-318.
40. Quinn T. P. 2005. The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. - Univ. of Washington Press.
41. Quinn T. P. and Foote C. J. 1994. The effects of body size and sexual dimorphism on the reproductive behaviour of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Anim. Behav. 48: 751-761.
42. Quinn T. P. and Buck G. B. 2001. Size- and sex-selective mortality of adult sockeye salmon: bears, gulls, and fish out of water. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130: 995-1005.
43. Quinn T. P. et al. 1996. Behavioral tactics of male sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) under varying operational sex ratios. Ethology 102: 304-322.
44. Quinn T. P. et al. 2001a. Balancing natural and sexual selection in sockeye salmon: interactions between body size, reproductive opportunity and vulnerability to predation by bears. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 917-937.
45. Quinn T. P. et al. 2001b. Influence of breeding habitat on bear predation and age at maturity and sexual dimorphism of sockeye salmon populations. Can. J. Zool. 79: 1782-1793.
46. Quinn T. P. et al. 2007. Directional selection by fisheries and the timing of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) migrations. Ecol. Appl. 17: 731-739.
47. Quinn T. P. et al. 2009. Anadromy and the life history of salmonid fishes: nature, nurture, and the hand of man. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 69: 23-42.
48. Richards R. A. and Rago P. J. 1999. A case history of effective fishery management: Chesapeake Bay striped bass. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 19: 356-375.
49. Rowe S. and Hutchings J. A. 2003. Mating systems and the conservation of commercially exploited marine fish. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 567-572.
50. Sæther B. E. et al. 2003. Effects of altering sex ratio structure on the demography of an isolated moose population. J. Wildlife Manage. 67: 455-466.
51. Sato T. and Goshima S. 2006. Impacts of male-only fishing and sperm limitation in manipulated populations of an unfished crab, Hapalogaster dentata. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 313: 193-204.
52. Scott W. B. and Scott M. G. 1988. Atlantic fishes of Canada. - Univ. of Toronto Press.
53. Serbezov D. et al. 2010. Mating patterns and determinants of individual reproductive success in brown trout (Salmo trutta) revealed by parentage analysis of an entire stream living population. Mol. Ecol. 19: 3193-3205.
54. Young K. A. 2005. Life-history variation and allometry for sexual size dimorphism in Pacific salmon and trout. Proc. R. Soc. B 272: 167-172.