Bioinspired polymeric surface patterns for medical applications

Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Functional Materials

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 287-292

  Kroner, Elmar ^a   Kaiser, Jessica S ^a   Fischer, Sarah C L ^a   Arzt, Eduard ^a,b  

^a INM LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR NEW MATERIALS   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Mechanical testing; Patterned polymer; Skin adhesive; Suture thread

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; MECHANICAL TESTING; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; SILICONES;

ADHESIVE SYSTEMS; BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; CASE-STUDIES; HUMAN SKIN; NEW FUNCTIONS; PATTERNED POLYMER; POLYMERIC SURFACES; SKIN ADHESIVES; SURFACE PATTERN; SUTURE THREAD;

ADHESION;

OXYGEN; POLYMER; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL SKIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; PLASMA; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; SUTURE;

EID: 84874280830     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22808000     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/JABFM.2012.10365     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 1997; 202: 1-8
2. Bechert DW, Hoppe G, Reif WE. On the drag reduction of the shark skin, AIAA Shear Flow Control Conf, Boulder, CO, 12-14 March, paper no. AIAA-85-0564
3. Bernhard CG. Structural and functional Adaptation in a visual system, Endeavour 1967; 26: 79-84
4. Kamperman M, Kroner E, del Campo A, McMeeking RM, Arzt E. Functional adhesive surfaces with "Gecko Effect": the concept of contact splitting. Adv Funct Mater 2010; 12: 335-48.
5. Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang YA, et al. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 12252-6.
6. Huber G, Mantz H, Spolenak R, et al. Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102: 16293-6.
7. Asnaghi MA, Candiani G, Farè S, et al. Trends in biomedical engineering: focus on Regenerative Medicine. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2011; 9: 73-86.
8. Kwak MK, Jeong HE, Suh KY. Rational design and enhanced biocompatibility of a dry adhesive medical skin patch. Adv Mater 2011; 23: 3949-53.
9. Mahdavi A, Ferreira L, Sundback C, et al. A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 2307-12.
10. Kaiser JS, Kamperman M, de Souza EJ, Schick B, Arzt E. Adhesion of biocompatible and biodegradable micro patterned surfaces. Int J Art Organs 2011; 34: 180-4.
11. de Souza EJ, Kamperman M, Castellanos G, et al. In vitro adhesion measurements between skin and micropatterned poly(dimethylsiloxane) surfaces, 31st Annual Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009; 17: 6018-21.
12. Autumn K, Dittmore A, Santos D, Spenko M, Cutkosky M. Frictional adhesion: A new angle on gecko attachment. J Exp Biol 2006; 209: 3569-79.
13. Greiner C, del Campo A, Arzt E. Adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned surfaces: effects of pillar radius, aspect ratio, and preload. Langmuir 2007; 23: 3495-502.
14. del Campo A, Greiner C, Arzt E. Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces. Langmuir 2007; 23: 10235-43.
15. Kroner E, Blau J, Arzt E. Note: An adhesion measurement setup for bioinspired fibrillar surfaces using flat probes. Rev Sci Instrum 2012; 83: 016101.
16. Kroner E, Arzt E. Single macropillars as model systems for tilt angle dependent adhesion measurements. Int J Adhes Adhes 2012; 36: 32-8.
17. Canas N, Kamperman M, Völker B, Kroner E, McMeeking RM, Arzt E. Effect of Nano and micro-roughness on adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned surfaces. Acta Biomater 2012; 8: 282-8.