Integration of process constraints from heterogeneous sources in process-aware information systems

Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, EMISA 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 51-64

  Rinderle Ma, Stefanie ^a   Mangler, Juergen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS COMPLIANCES; CONSISTENCY CHECKS; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; HETEROGENEOUS SOURCES; INTEGRATED PROCESS; INTERNAL CONTROLS; PROCESS CONSTRAINTS; PROCESS-AWARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REAL-WORLD PROCESS; SECURITY AND PRIVACY;

HARDWARE;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84874274461     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. A. Awad, M. Weidlich, and M. Weske. Visually specifying compliance rules and explaining their violations for business processes. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 22(1):30-55, 2011.
2. Basler Ausschuss fuer Bankenaufsicht. Internationale Konvergenz der Eigenkapitalmessung und Eigenkapitalanforderungen, 2006.
3. C. Heinlein. Workflow and Process Synchronization with Interaction Expressions and Graphs. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Data Engineering, page 243-252, 2001.
4. Barbara Halle and Larry Goldberg. Business Process Models and Business Rules: How They Should Work Together. In The Decision Model: A Business Logic Framework Linking Business and Technology. Taylor & Francis, LLC, 2009.
5. D. Knuplesch, L.T. Ly, S. Rinderle-Ma, H. Pfeifer, and P. Dadam. On Enabling Data-Aware Compliance Checking of Business Process Models. In Int'l Conf. Conceptual Modeling, volume 6412, pages 332-346, 2010.
6. L.T. Ly, S. Rinderle-Ma, and P. Dadam. Design and Verification of Instantiable Compliance Rule Graphs in Process-Aware Information Systems. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Advanced Systems Engineering, pages 9-23, 2010.
7. T. Ly, S. Rinderle-Ma, K. Göser, and P. Dadam. On Enabling Integrated Process Compliance with Semantic Constraints in Process Management Systems - Requirements, Challenges, Solutions. Information Systems Frontiers, pages 1-25, 2009.
8. R. Lu, S. Sadiq, and G. Governatori. Compliance Aw are Process Design. In Proc. Int'l Business Process Management Workshops '07, 2007.
9. Juergen Mangler and Stefanie Rinderle-Ma. IUPC: Identification and Unification of Process Constraints. CoRR, abs/1104.3609, 2011.
10. K. Namiri and N. Stojanovic. Pattern-Based Design and Validation of Business Process Compliance. In Int' OTM Conferences 2007, Part I, Volume 4803 of LNCS, page 59-76. Springer, 2007.
11. M. Pesic, H. Schonenberg, and W. M.P. van der Aalst. DECLARE: Full Support for Loosely-Structured Processes. In Int'l Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC'07), page 287-300, 2007.
12. M. Peleg and S. W. Tu. Design patterns for clinical guidelines. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 47(1):1-24, 2009.
13. S. Sadiq, G. Governatori, and K. Naimiri. Modeling Control Objectives for Business Process Compliance. In Proc. BPM '07, pages 149-164, 2007.
14. M. Strembeck and J. Mendling. Generic Algorithms for Consistency Checking of Mutual-Exclusion and Binding Constraints in a Business Process Context. In OTM Conferences (1), pages 204-221, 2010.
15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 7th Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Technical Report 03-5233, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, 2003.
16. W. van der Aalst, H. de Beer, and B. van Dongen. Process Mining and Verification of Properties: An Approach based on Temporal Logic. In Int'l OnTheMove Conferences, volume 3761, page 130-147, 2005.