Ikaros promotes early-born neuronal fates in the cerebral cortex

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Alsiö, Jessica M ^a   Tarchini, Basile ^b   Cayouette, Michel ^b,c   Livesey, Frederick J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b CLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cell fate; Developmental timing; Stem cells

Indexed keywords

IKAROS TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BRAIN CELL; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; DROSOPHILA; ELECTROPORATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INTERNAL RIBOSOME ENTRY SITE; MORPHOGENESIS; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RAT; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; CELL LINEAGE; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROPORATION; IKAROS TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; NEURONS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 84874273801     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1215707110     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Livesey FJ, Cepko CL (2001) Vertebrate neural cell-fate determination: Lessons from the retina. Nat Rev Neurosci 2 (2):109-118.
2. McConnell SK, Kaznowski CE (1991) Cell cycle dependence of laminar determination in developing neocortex. Science 254 (5029):282-285.
3. Frantz GD, McConnell SK (1996) Restriction of late cerebral cortical progenitors to an upper-layer fate. Neuron 17 (1):55-61.
4. Arlotta P, et al. (2005) Neuronal subtype-specific genes that control corticospinal motor neuron development in vivo. Neuron 45 (2):207-221.
5. Alcamo EA, et al. (2008) Satb2 regulates callosal projection neuron identity in the developing cerebral cortex. Neuron 57 (3):364-377.
6. Britanova O, et al. (2008) Satb2 is a postmitotic determinant for upper-layer neuron specification in the neocortex. Neuron 57 (3):378-392.
7. Chen B, et al. (2008) The Fezf2-Ctip2 genetic pathway regulates the fate choice of subcortical projection neurons in the developing cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105 (32):11382-11387.
8. Molyneaux BJ, Arlotta P, Hirata T, Hibi M, Macklis JD (2005) Fezl is required for the birth and specification of corticospinal motor neurons. Neuron 47 (6):817-831.
9. Kwan KY, et al. (2008) SOX5 postmitotically regulates migration, postmigratory differentiation, and projections of subplate and deep-layer neocortical neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105 (41):16021-16026.
10. Lai T, et al. (2008) SOX5 controls the sequential generation of distinct corticofugal neuron subtypes. Neuron 57 (2):232-247.
11. Bedogni F, et al. (2010) Tbr1 regulates regional and laminar identity of postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107 (29):13129-13134.
12. Han W, et al. (2011) TBR1 directly represses Fezf2 to control the laminar origin and development of the corticospinal tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108 (7):3041-3046.
13. McKenna WL, et al. (2011) Tbr1 and Fezf2 regulate alternate corticofugal neuronal identities during neocortical development. J Neurosci 31 (2):549-564.
14. Chen B, Schaevitz LR, McConnell SK (2005) Fezl regulates the differentiation and axon targeting of layer 5 subcortical projection neurons in cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (47):17184-17189.
15. Chen JG, Rasin MR, Kwan KY, Sestan N (2005) Zfp312 is required for subcortical axonal projections and dendritic morphology of deep-layer pyramidal neurons of the cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (49):17792-17797.
16. Isshiki T, Pearson B, Holbrook S, Doe CQ (2001) Drosophila neuroblasts sequentially express transcription factors which specify the temporal identity of their neuronal progeny. Cell 106 (4):511-521.
17. Brody T, Odenwald WF (2000) Programmed transformations in neuroblast gene expression during Drosophila CNS lineage development. Dev Biol 226 (1):34-44.
18. Grosskortenhaus R, Pearson BJ, Marusich A, Doe CQ (2005) Regulation of temporal identity transitions in Drosophila neuroblasts. Dev Cell 8 (2):193-202.
19. Novotny T, Eiselt R, Urban J (2002) Hunchback is required for the specification of the early sublineage of neuroblast 7-3 in the Drosophila central nervous system. Development 129 (4):1027-1036.
20. Grosskortenhaus R, Robinson KJ, Doe CQ (2006) Pdm and Castor specify late-born motor neuron identity in the NB7-1 lineage. Genes Dev 20 (18):2618-2627.
21. Elliott J, Jolicoeur C, Ramamurthy V, Cayouette M (2008) Ikaros confers early temporal competence to mouse retinal progenitor cells. Neuron 60 (1):26-39.
22. Lin SY, et al. (2003) The C elegans hunchback homolog, hbl-1, controls temporal patterning and is a probable microRNA target. Dev Cell 4 (5):639-650.
23. Abrahante JE, et al. (2003) The Caenorhabditis elegans hunchback-like gene lin-57/hbl-1 controls developmental time and is regulated by microRNAs. Dev Cell 4 (5):625-637.
24. Molnár A, Georgopoulos K (1994) The Ikaros gene encodes a family of functionally diverse zinc finger DNA-binding proteins. Mol Cell Biol 14 (12):8292-8303.
25. Morgan B, et al. (1997) Aiolos, a lymphoid restricted transcription factor that interacts with Ikaros to regulate lymphocyte differentiation. EMBO J 16 (8):2004-2013.
26. Hahm K, et al. (1998) Helios, a T cell-restricted Ikaros family member that quantitatively associates with Ikaros at centromeric heterochromatin. Genes Dev 12 (6):782-796.
27. Perdomo J, Holmes M, Chong B, Crossley M (2000) Eos and pegasus, two members of the Ikaros family of proteins with distinct DNA binding activities. J Biol Chem 275 (49):38347-38354.
28. Cai Q, Dierich A, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Chan S, Kastner P (2009) Helios deficiency has minimal impact on T cell development and function. J Immunol 183 (4):2303-2311.
29. Georgopoulos K, et al. (1994) The Ikaros gene is required for the development of all lymphoid lineages. Cell 79 (1):143-156.
30. Wang JH, et al. (1996) Selective defects in the development of the fetal and adult lymphoid system in mice with an Ikaros null mutation. Immunity 5 (6):537-549.
31. Merkenschlager M (2010) Ikaros in immune receptor signaling, lymphocyte differentiation, and function. FEBS Lett 584 (24):4910-4914.
32. Ng SY, Yoshida T, Georgopoulos K (2007) Ikaros and chromatin regulation in early hematopoiesis. Curr Opin Immunol 19 (2):116-122.
33. Honma Y, et al. (1999) Eos: A novel member of the Ikaros gene family expressed predominantly in the developing nervous system. FEBS Lett 447 (1):76-80.
34. Agoston DV, et al. (2007) Ikaros is expressed in developing striatal neurons and involved in enkephalinergic differentiation. J Neurochem 102 (6):1805-1816.
35. Martín-Ibáñez R, et al. (2010) Ikaros-1 couples cell cycle arrest of late striatal precursors with neurogenesis of enkephalinergic neurons. J Comp Neurol 518 (3):329-351.
36. Pearson BJ, Doe CQ (2003) Regulation of neuroblast competence in Drosophila. Nature 425 (6958):624-628.
37. Tarchini B, Jolicoeur C, Cayouette M (2012) In vivo evidence for unbiased ikaros retinal lineages using an ikaros-cre mouse line driving clonal recombination. Dev Dyn 241 (12):1973-1985.
38. Srinivas S, et al. (2001) Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev Biol 1:4.
39. Machon O, et al. (2002) Forebrain-specific promoter/enhancer D6 derived from the mouse Dach1 gene controls expression in neural stem cells. Neuroscience 112 (4):951-966.
40. van den Bout CJ, Machon O, Røsok O, Backman M, Krauss S (2002) The mouse enhancer element D6 directs Cre recombinase activity in the neocortex and the hippocampus. Mech Dev 110 (1-2):179-182.
41. Cobb BS, et al. (2000) Targeting of Ikaros to pericentromeric heterochromatin by direct DNA binding. Genes Dev 14 (17):2146-2160.
42. Papathanasiou P, et al. (2003) Widespread failure of hematolymphoid differentiation caused by a recessive niche-filling allele of the Ikaros transcription factor. Immunity 19 (1):131-144.
43. Brown KE, et al. (1997) Association of transcriptionally silent genes with Ikaros complexes at centromeric heterochromatin. Cell 91 (6):845-854.
44. Kathrein KL, Lorenz R, Innes AM, Griffiths E, Winandy S (2005) Ikaros induces quiescence and T-cell differentiation in a leukemia cell line. Mol Cell Biol 25 (5):1645-1654.
45. Winandy S, Wu P, Georgopoulos K (1995) A dominant mutation in the Ikaros gene leads to rapid development of leukemia and lymphoma. Cell 83 (2):289-299.
46. Ruiz A, Williams O, Brady HJ (2008) The Ikaros splice isoform, Ikaros 6, immortalizes murine haematopoietic progenitor cells. Int J Cancer 123 (6):1240-1245.
47. Sun L, Liu A, Georgopoulos K (1996) Zinc finger-mediated protein interactions modulate Ikaros activity, a molecular control of lymphocyte development. EMBO J 15 (19):5358-5369.
48. Trinh LA, et al. (2001) Down-regulation of TDT transcription in CD4 (+) CD8 (+) thymocytes by Ikaros proteins in direct competition with an Ets activator. Genes Dev 15 (14):1817-1832.
49. Hevner RF, et al. (2003) Beyond laminar fate: Toward a molecular classification of cortical projection/pyramidal neurons. Dev Neurosci 25 (2-4):139-151.
50. Lake BB, Sokol SY (2009) Strabismus regulates asymmetric cell divisions and cell fate determination in the mouse brain. J Cell Biol 185 (1):59-66.
51. Cleary MD, Doe CQ (2006) Regulation of neuroblast competence: Multiple temporal identity factors specify distinct neuronal fates within a single early competence window. Genes Dev 20 (4):429-434.
52. Pereira JD, et al. (2010) Ezh2, the histone methyltransferase of PRC2, regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in the cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107 (36):15957-15962.
53. Belliveau MJ, Cepko CL (1999) Extrinsic and intrinsic factors control the genesis of amacrine and cone cells in the rat retina. Development 126 (3):555-566.
54. Waid DK, McLoon SC (1998) Ganglion cells influence the fate of dividing retinal cells in culture. Development 125 (6):1059-1066.
55. Desai AR, McConnell SK (2000) Progressive restriction in fate potential by neural progenitors during cerebral cortical development. Development 127 (13):2863-2872.
56. Cappello S, et al. (2006) The Rho-GTPase cdc42 regulates neural progenitor fate at the apical surface. Nat Neurosci 9 (9):1099-1107.
57. Konno D, et al. (2008) Neuroepithelial progenitors undergo LGN-dependent planar divisions to maintain self-renewability during mammalian neurogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 10 (1):93-101.
58. Imai F, et al. (2006) Inactivation of aPKClambda results in the loss of adherens junctions in neuroepithelial cells without affecting neurogenesis in mouse neocortex. Development 133 (9):1735-1744.
59. Jacob J, Maurange C, Gould AP (2008) Temporal control of neuronal diversity: Common regulatory principles in insects and vertebrates? Development 135 (21):3481-3489.
60. Leone DP, Srinivasan K, Chen B, Alcamo E, McConnell SK (2008) The determination of projection neuron identity in the developing cerebral cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18 (1):28-35.
61. Kohwi M, Hiebert LS, Doe CQ (2011) The pipsqueak-domain proteins Distal antenna and Distal antenna-related restrict Hunchback neuroblast expression and early-born neuronal identity. Development 138 (9):1727-1735.
62. Georgi SA, Reh TA (2010) Dicer is required for the transition from early to late progenitor state in the developing mouse retina. J Neurosci 30 (11):4048-4061.
63. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215 (3):403-410.
64. Kondo T, Zákány J, Duboule D (1998) Control of colinearity in AbdB genes of the mouse HoxD complex. Mol Cell 1 (2):289-300.
65. Kim J, et al. (1999) Ikaros DNA-binding proteins direct formation of chromatin remodeling complexes in lymphocytes. Immunity 10 (3):345-355.
66. Polleux F, Ghosh A (2002) The slice overlay assay: A versatile tool to study the influence of extracellular signals on neuronal development. Sci STKE 2002 (136):pl9.