An environment for relation mining over richly annotated corpora: The case of GENIA

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 177, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Rinaldi, Fabio ^a   Schneider, Gerold ^a   Kaljurand, Kaarel ^a   Hess, Michael ^a   Romacker, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL DOMAIN; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; FINITE-STATE; HIGH LEVEL OF ABSTRACTION; HIGH-PRECISION; INTERACTIVE DEVELOPMENT; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; RAPID GROWTH; RELATION MINING; SCIENTIFIC RESULTS; SEMANTIC ONTOLOGY; SUPPORT TOOL;

PROTEINS; SEMANTICS;

FILTRATION;

EID: 84874273066     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S3-S3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Jensen LJ, Saric J, Bork P: Literature mining for the biologist: from information retrieval to biological discovery. Nature Reviews Genetics 2006, 7:119-129.
2. Rinaldi F, Schneider G, Kaljurand K, Hess M, Andronis C, Konstanti O, Persidis A: Mining of Functional Relations between Genes and Proteins over Biomedical Scientific Literature using a Deep-Linguistic Approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2006 in press.
3. Saric J, Jensen LJ, Ouzounova R, Rojas I, Bork P: Extraction of regulatory gene/protein networks from Medline. Bioinformatics 2005, 22(6):645-650.
4. Daraselia N, Egorov S, Yazhuk A, Novichkova S, Yuryev A, Mazo I: Extracting Protein Function Information from MEDLINE Using a Full-Sentence Parser. In Second European Workshop on Data Mining and Text Mining for Bioinformatics Edited by: Scheffer T. Pisa, Italy: ECML/PKDD; 2004:11-18.
5. Kim J, Ohta T, Tateisi Y, Tsujii J: GENIA Corpus - a Semantically Annotated Corpus for Bio-Textmining. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:180-182 [http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/suppl-1/i180].
6. Kaljurand K, Rinaldi F, Schneider G: Prolog-based query interface to syntactic dependencies extracted from biomedical literature. In Tech rep IFI, University of Zurich; 2006. [Technical Report IFI-2006.04]
7. Reynar JC, Ratnaparkhi A: A Maximum Entropy Approach to Identifying Sentence Boundaries. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing Washington, D.C.: University of Pennsylvania; 1997.
8. Ratnaparkhi A: A Maximum Entropy Part-Of-Speech Tagger. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Conference University of Pennsylvania; 1996.
9. Minnen G, Carroll J, Pearce D: Applied morphological processing of English. Natural Language Engineering 2001, 7(3):207-223.
10. Mikheev A: Automatic rule induction for unknown word guessing. Computational Linguistics 1997, 23(3):405-423.
11. Schneider G, Rinaldi F, Dowdall J: Fast, Deep-Linguistic Statistical Minimalist Dependency Parsing. COLING-2004 workshop on Recent Advances in Dependency Grammars, August 2004, Geneva, Switzerland 2004.
12. Schneider G: Extracting and Using Trace-Free Functional Dependencies from the Penn Treebank to Reduce Parsing Complexity. Proceedings of The Second Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2003), Växjö, Sweden 2003.
13. Schneider G: A broad-coverage, representationally minimal LFG Parser: chunks and F-structures are sufficient. In The 10th international LFG Conference (LFG 2005) Edited by: Butt M, King TH. Bergen, Norway: CSLI; 2005.
14. Collins M: Head-Statistical Models for Natural Language Processing. In PhD thesis University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; 1999.
15. Marcus M, Santorini B, Marcinkiewicz M: Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 1993, 19:313-330.
16. Carroll J, Minnen G, Briscoe E: Parser evaluation: using a grammatical relation annotation scheme. In Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora Edited by: Abeillé A. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2003:299-316.
17. Lin D: Dependency-based Evaluation of MINIPAR. Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing Systems, Granada, Spain 1998.
18. Preiss J: Using Grammatical Relations to Compare Parsers. Proc of EACL 03, Budapest, Hungary 2003:291-296.
19. Hindle D, Rooth M: Structural Ambiguity and Lexical Relations. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 1991:229-236 [http://citeseer. ist.psu.edu/hindle93structural.html].
20. Rinaldi F, Schneider G, Kaljurand K, Hess M, Andronis C, Persidis A, Konstanti O: Relation Mining over a Corpus of Scientific Literature. In Proceedings of AIME 2005 Aberdeen, Scotland: Springer Verlag; 2005:550-559. LNAI 3581
21. Cussens J, Nédellec C, (Eds): Proceedings of the workshop "Learning Language in Logic (LLL05)" 2005 [http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/ aig/lll/lll05/].
22. Huang M, Zhu X, Payan DG, Qu K, Li M: Discovering Patterns to Extract Protein-Protein Interactions from Full Texts. OUP Bioinformatics 2004, 20(18):3604-3612.
23. Rindflesch T, Fiszman M, Libbus B: Semantic Interpretation for the Biomedical Literature. In Medical Informatics: Advances in Knowledge Management and Data Mining in Biomedicine Edited by: Chen H, Fuller WHS, Friedman C. Springer-Verlag; 2005:399-422.
24. Corney DPA, Buxton BF, Langdon WB, Jones D: BioRAT: Extracting Biological Information from Full-Length Papers. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(17):3206-13.
25. Leroy G, Chen H, Martinez JD: A Shallow Parser Based on Closed-Class Words to Capture Relations in Biomedical Text. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2003, 36(3):145-58.
26. Koike A, Kobayashi Y, Takagi T: Kinase Pathway Database: An Integrated Protein-Kinase and NLP-Based Protein-Interaction Resource. Genome Res 2003, 13(6):1231-1243 [http://www.genome.org/cgi/content/abstract/13/6a/1231].
27. Yakushiji A, Miyao Y, Tateisi Y, Tsujii J: Biomedical Information Extraction with Predicate-Argument Structure Patterns.
28. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine 2005:60-69.
29. Novichkova S, Egorov S, Daraselia N: MedScan, a Natural Language Processing Engine for MEDLINE Abstracts. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(13):1699-1706.
30. Friedman C, Kra P, Krauthammer MH, Rzhetsky A: GENIES: a Natural-Language Processing System for the Extraction of Molecular Pathways from Journal Articles. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:74-82.
31. Riedel S, Klein E: Genie Interaction Extraction with Semantic and Syntactic Chains. Cussens and Nédellec 2005, 21: [http://www.cs.york.ac. uk/aig/lll/lll05/].
32. Hakenberg J, Plake C, Leser U, Kirsch H, Rebholz-Schuhmann D: LLL'05 Challenge: Genie Interaction Extraction - Identification of Language Patterns Based on Alignment and Finite State Automata. Cussens and Nédellec 2005, 21: [http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/aig/lll/lll05/].
33. Romacker M, Grandjean N, Parisot P, Kreim O, Cronenberger D, Vachon T, Peitsch M: The UltraLink: An Expert System for Contextual Hyperlinking in Knowledge Management. I n Computer Applications in Pharmaceutical Research and Development Edited by: Ekins S. Wiley; 2006 in press.