Subjective and objective outcomes 1 year after robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

Journal of Robotic Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 35-38

  Salamon, Charbel G ^a   Culligan, Patrick J ^a  

^a Atlantic Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Prolapse; Robotics; Sacrocolpopexy

Indexed keywords

FLOORS; LAPAROSCOPY; MESH GENERATION; ROBOTICS;

CURE RATE; FOLLOW UP; HYDROPHILICS; OUTCOME MEASURES; PAIRED COMPARISON; PROLAPSE; SACROCOLPOPEXY; WILCOXON SIGNED RANK TEST;

POLYPROPYLENES;

EID: 84874217858     PISSN: 18632483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-012-0337-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 29: 4-20.
2. Jelovesk JE, Maher C, Barber MD (2007) Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 369: 1027-1038.
3. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstorm JO et al (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89: 501-506.
4. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104: 805-823.
5. Culligan PJ, Murphy M, Blackwell L et al (2002) Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187: 1473-1482.
6. Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B et al (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 113: 367-373.
7. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR et al (2005) Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192: 1752-1758.
8. Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM et al (2005) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112: 1201-1206.
9. Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK (2006) Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolpase. J Urol 176: 655-659.
10. Elliott DS, Frank I, Di Marco DS et al (2004) Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Surg 188: 52S-56S.
11. Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT et al (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 63: 373-376.
12. Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J et al (2005) Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 19: 1200-1203.
13. Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C et al (2007) Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolapse (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes. BJU Int 100: 875-879.
14. Akl MN, Long JB, Giles DL et al (2009) Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc 23: 2390-2394.
15. Salamon C, Shariati A, Culligan PJ (2010) Optimizing efficiency with robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Female Patient 35(4): 33-38.
16. White AB, Carrick KS, Corton MM et al (2009) Optimal location and orientation of suture placement in abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 113: 1098-1103.
17. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorder (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193: 103-113.
18. Murphy M, Sternschuss G, Haff R et al (2008) Quality of life and surgical satisfaction after vaginal reconstructive vs obliterative surgery for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapsed. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198: 573. e1-573. e7.