The Importance of Randomized Experiments in Evaluating Crime Prevention

The Oxford Handbook of Crime Prevention

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Weisburd, David ^a,b   Hinkle, Joshua C ^c  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crime prevention efforts; Crime prevention researchers; Experimental methods; Nonexperimental methods; Randomized experiments; Risks; Statistical advantage

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874205588     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398823.013.0022     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Asscher, Jessica J., Maja Dekovic, Peter H. van der Laan, Pier J.M. Prins, and Sander van Arum. 2007. "Implementing Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Settings: An Evaluation of Multi-systemic therapy in the Netherlands." Journal of Experimental Criminology 3:113-29.
2. Berecochea J. E., and D. R. Jaman. 1981. Time Served in Prison and Parole Outcome: An Experimental Study (Report No. 2). Sacremento: California Department of Corrections Research Division.
3. Boruch, Robert. 1975. "On Common Contentions About Randomized Field Experments." In Experimental Testing of Public Policy: The Proceedings of the 1974 Social Sciences Research Council Conference on Social Experimentation, edited by Robert Boruch and H. W. Reikens. Boulder, CO: Westview.
4. Boruch, Robert. 2010. "To Flop is Human: Can We (Should We) Invent Orderly/Disciplined/Scientific Approaches to Anticipating Failure to Meet Expectations in Testing Innovations and to Learn from Such Failure?" Paper presented at the Second Annual Symposium of the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy at George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, August 9-10.
5. Boruch, Robert, Timothy Victor, and Joe Cecil. 2000. "Resolving Ethical and Legal Problems in Randomized Experiments." Crime & Delinquency 46:300-53.
6. Campbell, Donald P., and Robert F. Boruch. 1975. "Making the Case for Randomized Assignment to Treatments by Considering the Alternatives: Six Ways in Which Quasi-Experimental Evaluations in Compensatory Education Tend to Underestimate Effects." In Evaluation and Experiment: Some Critical Issues in Assessing Social Programs, edited by Carl A. Bennet and Arthur A. Lumsdain. New York: Academic Press.
7. Clarke, Ronald V. G., and Derek B. Cornish. 1972. The Controlled Trial in Institutional Research: Paradigm or Pitfall for Penal Evaluators? London: HMSO.
8. Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Cook, Thomas D., and Donald P. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
10. De Leon, George, Gerald Melnick, George Thomas, David Kressel, and Harry K. Wexler. 2000. "Motivation for Treatment in a Prison-Based Therapeutic Community." American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 26:33-46.
11. Eck, John E. 2006. "When Is a Bolgna Sandwhich Better than Sex? A Defense of Small-n Case Study Evaluations." Journal of Experimental Criminology 2:345-62.
12. Farrington, David P. 1983. "Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice." In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 4, edited by Michael Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Farrington, David P., and Brandon C. Welsh. 2005. "Randomized Experiments in Criminology: What Have We Learned in the Last Two Decades?" Journal of Experimental Criminology 1:9-38.
14. Feder, Lynette, Annette Jolin, and William Feyerherm. 2000. "Lessons from Two Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Settings." Crime and Delinquency 46:380-400.
15. Flay, Brian R., and J. Allen Best. 1982. "Overcoming Design Problems in Evaluation of Health Behavior Programs." Evaluation and the Health Professions 5:43-69.
16. Heckman, James J., and Jeffrey A. Smith. 1995. "Assessing the Case for Social Experiments." Journal of Economic Perspective 9:85-110.
17. Lipsey, Mark, Carol Petrie, David Weisburd, and Denise Gottfredson. 2006. "Improving Evaluation of Anti-Crime Programs: Summary of a National Research Council Report." Journal of Experimental Criminology 2:271-307.
18. Losel, Friedrich, and Marin Schmucker. 2005. "The Effectiveness of Treatment for Sexual Offenders: A Comprehensive Metal-Analysis." Journal of Experimental Criminology 1:117-46.
19. Lum, Cynthia, and Sue-Ming Yang. 2005. "Why Do Evaluation Researchers in Crime and Justice Choose Non-Experimental Methods?" Journal of Experimental Criminology 1:191-213.
20. MacKenzie, Doris L. 2006. What Works in Corrections: Reducing the Criminal Activities of Offenders and Delinquents. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Manski, Charles F. 2011. "Policy Choice with Partial Knowledge of Policy Effectiveness." Journal of Experimental Criminology 7:111-25.
22. McCord, Joan. 2003. "Cures That Harm: Unanticipated Outcomes of Crime Prevention Programs." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587:16-30.
23. Olds, David L., Charles R. Henderson, Robert Chamberlin, and Robert Tattlebaum. 1986. "Preventing Child Abuse and Neglect: A Randomized Trial of Nurse Home Visitation." Pediatrics 78:1436-45.
24. Pawson, Ray, and Nick Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
25. Petrosino, Anthony J., Robert Boruch, David P. Farrington, Lawrence Sherman, and David Weisburd. 2003. "Toward Evidence-Based Criminology and Criminal Justice: Systematic Reviews, The Campbell Collaboration, and the Crime and Justice Group." International Journal of Comparative Criminology 3:42-61.
26. Rosenthal, Robert. 1965. "The Volunteer Subject." Human Relations 18:389-406.
27. Shadish, William R., Thomas D. Cook, and Donald T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28. Shepherd, Jonathan P. 2003. "Explaining Feast or Famine in Randomized Field Trials: Medicine and Criminology Compared." Evaluation Review 27:290-315.
29. Sherman, Lawrence W. 2006. "'To Develop and Test:' The Inventive Difference between Evaluation and Experimentation." Journal of Experimental Criminology 2:393-406.
30. Sherman, Lawrence W. 2007. "The Power Few: Experimental Criminology and the Reduction of Harm. The 2006 Joan McCord Prize Lecture." Journal of Experimental Criminology 3:299-321.
31. Sherman, Lawrence W., Denise Gottfredson, Doris L. MacKenzie, John E. Eck, Peter Reuter and, Shawn Bushway. 1997. What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
32. Solomon, Phyllis L., Mary M. Cavanaugh, and Jeffrey Draine. 2009. Randomized Controlled Trials: Design and Implementation for Community-Based Psychosocial Interventions. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Taxman, Faye S. 1998. Reducing Recidivism Through a Seamless System of Care: Components of Effective Treatment, Supervision, and Transition Services in the Community. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy.
34. Telep, Cody W. 2009. "Citation Analysis of Randomized Experiments in Criminology and Criminal Justice: A Research Note." Journal of Experimental Criminology 5:441-64.
35. Weisburd, David. 1996. Preface. In Policing Places with Drug Problems by Lorraine Green. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36. Weisburd, David. 2000. "Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Policy: Prospects and Problems." Crime & Delinquency 46:181-93.
37. Weisburd, David. 2003. "Ethical Practice and Evaluation of Interventions in Crime and Justice: The Moral Imperative for Randomized Trials." Evaluation Review 27: 336-54.
38. Weisburd, David. 2005. "Hot Spots Experiments and Criminal Justice Research: Lessons From the Field." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 578:220-45.
39. Weisburd, David, and Chester Britt. 2007. Statistics in Criminal Justice, 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
40. Weisburd, David, Cynthia Lum, and Anthony Petrosino. 2001. "Does Research Design Affect Study Outcomes in Criminal Justice." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social 578:50-70.
41. Weisburd, David, and Joseph Naus. 2001. "Report to Special Master David Baime: Assessment of the Index of Outcomes Approach for Use inProportionality Review." New Jersey Administrative Office of the Courts, Trenton.
42. Weisburd, David, Anthony Petrosino, and Gail Mason. 1993. "Design Sensitivity in Criminal Justice Experiments." In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 17, edited by Michael Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Weisburd, David, and Alex R. Piquero. 2008. "Taking Stock of How Well CriminologistsExplain Crime: A Review of Published Studies." In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 37, edited by Michael Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Weisburd, David, and Faye S. Taxman. 2000. "Developing a Multicenter Randomized Trial in Criminology: The Case of HIDTA." Journal of Quantitative Criminology 16:315-40.
45. Welsh, Brandon C., Meghan E. Peel, David P. Farrington, Henk Elffers, and Anthony A. Braga. 2011. "Research Design Influence on Study Outcomes in Crime and Justice: A Partial Replication with Public Area Surveillance." Journal of Experimental Criminology 7: 183-198.
46. Wilkinson, Leland, and Taskforce on Statistical Inference. 1999. "Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and Explanations." American Psychologist 54: 594-604.