Corporate Environmental and Economic Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable Development

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 187-201

  Fujii, Hidemichi ^a   Iwata, Kazuyuki ^b   Kaneko, Shinji ^c   Managi, Shunsuke ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TAKASAKI CITY UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS   (Japan)

^c HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

CO2 emissions; Corporate environmental management; Environmental efficiency; Japanese manufacturing firm; Sustainable development; Toxic chemical substances

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; MANUFACTURING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

JAPAN;

EID: 84874190549     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1747     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Al-Tuwaijri SA, Christensen TE, Hughes KII. 2004. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(5-6): 447-471.
2. Ambec S, Lanoie P. 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives 22: 45-62.
3. Aragón-Correa JA, Hurtado-Torres N, Sharma S, García-Morales VJ. 2008. Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management 86(1): 88-103.
4. Böhringer C, Moslener U, Oberndorfer U, Ziegler A. 2012. Clean and productive? Empirical evidence from the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy 41(2): 442-451.
5. Bramoulléa Y, Olson LJ. 2005. Allocation of pollution abatement under learning by doing. Journal of Public Economics 89(9-10): 1935-1960.
6. Capon N, Farley JU, Hoenig S. 1990. Determinants of financial performance: A meta-analysis. Management Science 36(10): 1143-1159.
7. Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP. 2011. Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 30(2): 122-144.
8. Claver E, Lopez MD, Molina JF, Tari JJ. 2007. Environmental management and firm performance: A case study. Journal of Environmental Management 84: 606-619.
9. Crotty J, Smith M. 2008. Strategic responses to environmental regulation in the U.K. automotive sector: The European Union End-of-Life vehicle directive and the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 10(4): 95-111.
10. Darnall N, Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 2008. Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? Journal of International Management 14(4): 364-376.
11. Frondel M, Horbach J, Rennings K. 2007. End-of-pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions: Across OECD countries. Business Strategy and the Environment 16: 571-584.
12. Fujii H, Managi S, Kawahara H. 2011. The pollution release and transfer register system in the U.S. and Japan: An analysis of productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production 19(12): 1330-1338.
13. Fujii H, Kaneko S, Managi S. 2010. Changes in environmentally sensitive productivity and technological modernization in China's iron and steel industry in the 1990s. Environment and Development Economics 15(4): 485-504.
14. Grolleau G, Mzoughi N, Pekovic S. 2012. Green not (only) for profit: An empirical examination of the effect of environmental-related standards on employees' recruitment. Resource and Energy Economics 34(1): 74-92.
15. Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG. 2005. Productivity efficiency and firm size: An empirical analysis of foreign owned companies. International Business Review 16(6): 713-731.
16. Hart SL, Ahuja G. 1996. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 5(1): 30-37.
17. Hahn T. Figge F. Pinkse J. Preuss L. 2010. Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(4): 217-229.
18. Henri JF, Journeault M. 2010. Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35(1): 63-80.
19. Hibiki A, Managi S. 2010. Environmental information provision, market valuation, and firm incentives: An empirical study of the Japanese PRTR system. Land Economics 86(2): 382-393.
20. Iraldo F, Testa S, Frey M. 2009. Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European union. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(16): 1444-1452.
21. Iwata H, Okada K. 2011. How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics 70(9): 1691-1700.
22. Jasch C. 2006. How to perform an environmental management cost assessment in one day. Journal of Cleaner Production 14: 1194-1213.
23. King AA, Lenox MJ. 2001. Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5(1): 105-116.
24. Kjaerheim G. 2005. Cleaner production and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 13(4): 329-339.
25. Konar S, Cohen MA. 2001. Does the market value environmental performance? The Review of Economics and Statistics 83(2): 281-289.
26. Meric I, McCall CW, Meric G. 2008. U.S. and Japanese Electronic and Electrical Equipment Manufacturing Firms: A Comparison. International Bulletin of Business Administration, 3: 1-5.
27. Nagahata T, Sekine T. 2005. Firm investment, monetary transmission and balance-sheet problems in Japan: an investigation using micro data. Japan and the World Economy 17(3): 345-369.
28. Nakao Y, Amano A, Matsumura K, Genba K, Nakano M. 2007. Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Japanese corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment 16: 106-118.
29. Nishitani K, Kokubu K. 2011. Why Does the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Enhance Firm Value? The Case of Japanese Manufacturing Firms. Business Strategy and the Environment (in press) DOI: 10.1002/bse.734.
30. Nishitani K, Kaneko S, Fujii H, Komatsu S. 2011. Effect of the reduction of pollution emissions on the economic performance of firms: An empirical analysis focusing on demand and productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production 19(17-18): 1956-1964.
31. Ogawa K. 2007. Debt, R&D Investment and Technological Progress: A Panel Study of Japanese Manufacturing Firms in the 90s. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 21: 403-423.
32. Osawa Y, Yamasaki Y. 2005. Proposal of industrial research and development performance indices. R&D Management 35(4): 455-461.
33. Palmer K, Oates WE, Portney PR. 1995. Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 119-132.
34. Panasonic group. 2010. 'eco ideas' Report 2010, Panasonic corporation.
35. Pedersen ER, Neergaard P. 2005. Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware! environmental labelling and the limitations of 'green' consumerism. Business Strategy and the Environment 15(1): 15-29.
36. Porter ME. 1991. America's green strategy. Scientific American 264(4): p. 96.
37. Porter ME, van der Linde C. 1995. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review 73(5): 120-134.
38. Remmen A, Lorentzen B. 2000. Employee participation and cleaner technology: learning processes in environmental teams. Journal of Cleaner Production 8(5): 365-373.
39. Ricoh Corporation. 2011. Ricoh group sustainability (environmental) report 2011, Ricoh.
40. Rugman AM, Verbeke A. 1998. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal 19: 363-375.
41. Russo MV, Fouts PA. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40(3): 534-559.
42. Schaltegger S, Wagner M. 2011. Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment 20(4): 222-237.
43. Steger U. 2004. The business of sustainability: building industry cases for corporate sustainability. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
44. Stone L. 2000. When case studies are not enough: the influence of corporate culture and employee attitudes on the success of cleaner production initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production 8(5): 353-359.
45. Testa F, Styles D, Iraldo F. 2012. Case study evidence that direct regulation remains the main driver of industrial pollution avoidance and may benefit operational efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production 21(1): 1-10.
46. Thomas A. 2001. Corporate environmental policy and abnormal stock price returns: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment 10(3): 125-134.
47. UNEP, 2006. Environmental Agreements and Cleaner Production, Nairobi, Kenya, UNEP.
48. Wagner M, Phu NV, Azomahou T, Wehrmeyer W. 2002. The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: and empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9(3): 133-146.
49. Wagner N. 2010. The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics 69(7): 1553-1560.
50. Walley N, Whitehead B. 1994. It's Not Easy Being Green. Harvard Business Review 72(3): 46-47.
51. Zeng SX, Meng XH, Yin HT, Tam CM, Sun L. 2010. Impact of cleaner production on business performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(10-11): 975-983.