Classification of difference between inhibition constants of an inhibitor to facilitate identifying the inhibition type

Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 205-213

  Yang, Xiaolan ^a   Du, Zhiyin ^a   Pu, Jun ^a   Zhao, Hua ^a   Chen, Hong ^a   Liu, Yin ^a   Li, Zhirong ^a   Cheng, Zhenli ^a   Zhong, Huansi ^a   Liao, Fei ^a  

^a CHONGQING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Classification; Inhibition constants; Inhibition types; Uncompetitive inhibitors

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; PENTETIC ACID; URATE OXIDASE; URIC ACID; XANTHINE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPETITIVE INHIBITION; ENZYME INHIBITION; ENZYME KINETICS; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; MICHAELIS CONSTANT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SIMULATION; TISSUE HOMOGENATE;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYME INHIBITORS; INTESTINES; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PHENYLALANINE; RABBITS; URATE OXIDASE; XANTHINE;

EID: 84874156122     PISSN: 14756366     EISSN: 14756374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14756366.2011.645240     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dixon M, Webb EC. (1979).Enzymes (2nd ed.). London, UK: Longman
2. Price NC, Stevens L. (1982). Fundamentals of enzymology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
3. Palmer T. (1985). Understanding enzymes (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood Limited
4. Cornish-Bowden A. Why is uncompetitive inhibition so rare? A possible explanation, with implications for the design of drugs and pesticides. FEBS Lett 1986;203:3-6 (Pubitemid 16043480)
5. Westley AM, Westley J. Enzyme inhibition in open systems. Superiority of uncompetitive agents. J Biol Chem 1996;271: 5347-352
6. Knight SD, Parrish CA. Recent progress in the identification and clinical evaluation of inhibitors of the mitotic kinesin KSP. Curr Top Med Chem 2008;8:888-904 (Pubitemid 351984711)
7. Cleland WW. Statistical analysis of enzyme kinetic data. Meth Enzymol 1979;63:103-138
8. Spector T, Hajian G. Statistical methods to distinguish competitive, noncompetitive, and uncompetitive enzyme inhibitors. Anal iochem 1981;115:403-409
9. Bronson DD, Daniels DM, Dixon JT, Redick CC, Haaland PD. Virtual kinetics: Using statistical experimental design for rapid analysis of enzyme inhibitor mechanisms. Biochem Pharmacol 1995;50:823-831
10. Kakkar T, Pak Y, Mayersohn M. Evaluation of a minimal experimental design for determination of enzyme kinetic parameters and inhibition mechanism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000;293: 861-869 (Pubitemid 30417852)
11. López-Fidalgo J, Wong WK. Design issues for the Michaelis-Menten model. J Theor Biol 2002;215:1-11
12. Cortés A, Cascante M, Cárdenas ML, Cornish-Bowden A. Relationships between inhibition constants, inhibitor concentrations for 50% inhibition and types of inhibition: New ways of analysing data. Biochem J 2001;357:263-268 (Pubitemid 32642925)
13. Liao F, Zhu XY, Wang YM, Zuo YP. The comparison of the estimation of enzyme kinetic parameters by fitting reaction curve to the integrated Michaelis-Menten rate equations of different predictor variables. J Biochem Biophys Methods 2005;62:13-24 (Pubitemid 40138073)
14. Heppel LA. Intestinal phosphomonoesterase. Methods Enzymol 1955;2:530-533
15. Liu B, Zhao Y, Zhao L, Xie Y, Zhu S, Li Z et al. An integration strategy to estimate the initial rates of enzyme reactions with much expanded linear ranges using uricases as models. Anal Chim Acta 2009;631:22-28
16. Liao F, Yang D, Tang J, Yang X, Liu B, Zhao Y et al. The measurement of serum cholinesterase activities by an integration strategy with expanded linear ranges and negligible substrate-activation. Clin Biochem 2009;42:926-928
17. Zhao Y, Zhao L, Yang G, Tao J, Bu Y, Liao F. Characterization of a uricase from Bacillus fastidious A.T.C.C. 26904 and its application to serum uric acid assay by a patented kinetic uricase method. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2006;45:75-80 (Pubitemid 44358592)
18. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of proteindye binding. Anal Biochem 1976;72:248-254
19. Fridovich I. The competitive inhibition of uricase by oxonate and by related derivatives of S-Triazines. J Biol Chem 1965; 240:2491-2494
20. Conley TG, Priest DG. Thermodynamics and stoicheiometry of the binding of substrate analogues to uricase. Biochem J 1980; 187:727-732
21. Kahn K, Tipton PA. Kinetic mechanism and cofactor content of soybean root nodule urate oxidase. Biochemistry 1997; 36:4731-4738 (Pubitemid 27180953)
22. Ghosh NK, Fishman WH. On the mechanism of inhibition of intestinal alkaline phosphatase by L-phenylalanine. I. Kinetic studies. J Biol Chem 1966;241:2516-2522
23. Steinbach WR, Richter K. Multiple classification and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Med Decis Making 1987;7:234-237 (Pubitemid 17143595)
24. Rockette HE. An index for diagnostic accuracy in the multiple disease setting. Acad Radiol 1994;1:283-286
25. Obuchowski NA, Goske MJ, Applegate KE. Assessing physicians'
26. accuracy in diagnosing paediatric patients with acute abdominal pain: Measuring accuracy for multiple diseases. Stat Med 2001;20: 3261-3278