Mental map preservation helps user orientation in dynamic graphs

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7704 LNCS, Issue , 2013, Pages 475-486

  Archambault, Daniel ^a   Purchase, Helen C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC GRAPH; EVOLVING GRAPHS; FORMAL EXPERIMENTS; MENTAL MAPS; SPECIFIC LOCATION; USER-ORIENTATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

DRAWING (GRAPHICS);

EID: 84874129042     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36763-2_42     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Archambault, D., Purchase, H.C.: The mental map and memorability in dynamic graphs. In: Proc. of the IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis 2012), pp. 89-96 (2012)
2. Archambault, D., Purchase, H.C., Pinaud, B.: Difference Map Readability for Dynamic Graphs. In: Brandes, U., Cornelsen, S. (eds.) GD 2010. LNCS, vol. 6502, pp. 50-61. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
3. Archambault, D., Purchase, H.C., Pinaud, B.: Animation, small multiples, and the effect of mental map preservation in dynamic graphs. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17(4), 539-552 (2011)
4. Auber, D.: Tulip: A huge graph visualization framework. In: Mutzel, P., Jünger, M. (eds.) Graph Drawing Software. Mathematics and Visualization, pp. 105-126. Springer (2003)
5. Bederson, B.B., Boltman, A.: Does animation help users build mental maps of spatial information? In: Proc. of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 28-35 (1999)
6. Brandes, U., Indlekofer, N., Mader, M.: Visualization methods for longitudinal social networks and stochastic actor-oriented modeling. Social Networks 34(3), 291-308 (2011)
7. Brandes, U., Mader, M.: A Quantitative Comparison of Stress-Minimization Approaches for Offline Dynamic Graph Drawing. In: van Kreveld, M., Speckmann, B. (eds.) GD 2011. LNCS, vol. 7034, pp. 99-110. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
8. Coleman, M.K., Parker, D.S.: Aesthetics-based graph layout for human consumption. Software - Practice and Experience 26(12), 1415-1438 (1996)
9. Eades, P., Lai, W., Misue, K., Sugiyama, K.: Preserving the mental map of a diagram. In: Proc. of Compugraphics, pp. 24-33 (1991)
10. Erten, C., Harding, P.J., Kobourov, S.G., Wampler, K., Yee, G.: GraphAEL: Graph Animations with Evolving Layouts. In: Liotta, G. (ed.) GD 2003. LNCS, vol. 2912, pp. 98-110. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) (Pubitemid 39744176)
11. Farrugia, M., Quigley, A.: Effective temporal graph layout: A comparative study of animation versus static display methods. Journal of Information Visualization 10(1), 47-64 (2011)
12. Frishman, Y., Tal, A.: Online dynamic graph drawing. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14(4), 727-740 (2008)
13. Ghani, S., Elmqvist, N.: Improving revisitation in graphs through static spatial features. In: Proc. of Graphics Interface (GI 2011), pp. 175-182 (2011)
14. Ghani, S., Elmqvist, N., Yi, J.S.: Perception of animated node-link diagrams for dynamic graphs. In: Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. EuroVis 2012), vol. 31, pp. 1205-1214 (2012)
15. Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics-Doklady 10(8), 707-710 (1966)
16. Liu, G., Austen, E.L., Booth, K.S., Fisher, B.D., Argue, R., Rempel, M.I., Enns, J.T.: Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31(2), 235-247 (2005)
17. Misue, K., Eades, P., Lai, W., Sugiyama, K.: Layout adjustment and the mental map. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 6, 183-210 (1995)
18. Purchase, H.C., Samra, A.: Extremes Are Better: Investigating Mental Map Preservation in Dynamic Graphs. In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 60-73. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
19. Pylyshyn, Z.W., Storm, R.W.: Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision 3(3), 179-197 (1988)
20. Saffrey, P., Purchase, H.C.: The "mental map" versus "static aesthetic" compromise in dynamic graphs: A user study. In: Proc. of the 9th Australasian User Interface Conference, pp. 85-93 (2008)
21. Skopik, A., Gutwin, C.: Improving revisitation in fisheye views with visit wear. In: Proc. of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005), pp. 771-780 (2005)
22. Tufte, E.: Envisioning Information. Graphics Press (1990)
23. Yantis, S.: Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology 24, 295-340 (1992)