Application of immobilized upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor using Clostridium LS2 for enhanced biohydrogen production and treatment efficiency of palm oil mill effluent

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 2221-2229

  Singh, Lakhveer ^a   Wahid, Zularisam A ^a   Siddiqui, Muhammad Faisal ^a   Ahmad, Anwar ^b   Rahim, Mohd Hasbi Ab ^a   Sakinah, Mimi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA PAHANG   (Malaysia)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

(UASB) reactor; Hydrogen; Immobilization; Palm oil mill effluent (POME); Polyethylene glycol (PEG); Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket

Indexed keywords

BUTYRIC ACID; CARBON; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; CLOSTRIDIUM; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; EFFLUENTS; FATTY ACIDS; HYDROGEN; OIL SHALE; PALM OIL; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYETHYLENES; RADIOACTIVE WASTE VITRIFICATION; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

(UASB) REACTOR; ENHANCED BIOHYDROGEN PRODUCTIONS; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; HYDROGEN FERMENTATION; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION RATE; PALM OIL MILL EFFLUENTS; UP-FLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BLANKET REACTORS; UPFLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BLANKETS;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

EID: 84874115526     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Pakarinen O, Lehtomaki A, Rintala J. Batch dark fermentative hydrogen production from grass silage: the effect of inoculums, pH, temperature and VS ration. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;33:594-601.
2. Ginkel SV, Sung S. Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environ Sci Technol 2001;35: 4726-30.
3. Benemann J. Hydrogen biotechnology: progress and prospect. Nat Biotechnol 1996;14:1101-3.
4. Brentner LB, Peccia J, Zimmerman JB. Challenges in developing biohydrogen as a sustainable energy source: implications for a research agenda. Environ Sci Technol 2010;44:2243-54.
5. Hallenbeck PC. Fermentative hydrogen production: principles, progress, and prognosis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34(17):7379-89.
6. Lalaurette E, Thammannagowda S, Mohagheghi A, Maness PC, Logan BE. Hydrogen production from cellulose in a two stage process combining fermentation and electrohydrogenesis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34(15):6201-10.
7. Wu TY, Mohammad AW, Md Jahim J, Anuar N. A holistic approach to managing palm oil mill effluent (POME): biotechnological advances in the sustainable reuse of POME. Biotechnol Adv 2009;27:40-52.
8. Lam MK, Lee KT. Renewable and sustainable bioenergies production from palm oil mill effluent (POME): winewin strategies toward better environmental protection. Biotechnol Adv 2011;29:124-41.
9. Atif AAY, Fakhru'i-Razia A, Ngan MA, Morimoto M, Iyuke SE, Veziroglu NT. Fed batch production of hydrogen from palm oil mill effluent using anaerobic microflora. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2005;30:1393-7.
10. O-Thong S, Prasertsan P, Intrasungkha N, Dhamwichukorn S, Birkeland NK. Improvement of biohydrogen production and pollution reduction from palm oil mill effluent with nutrient supplementation at thermophilic condition using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Enzyme Microb Technol 2007;41:583-90.
11. Ismail I, Hassan MA, Rahman NAA, Soon CS. Thermophilic biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using suspended mixed culture. Biomass Bioenergy 2010;34:42-7.
12. Yusoff MZM, Rahman NAA, Abd-Aziz S, Ling CM, Hassan MA, Shirai Y. The effect of hydraulic retention time and volatile fatty acids on biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent under non-sterile condition. Austral J Basic Appl Sci 2010;4(4):577-87.
13. Badiei M, Md Jahim J, Anuar N, Abdullah SRS. Effect of hydraulic retention time on biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent in anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36:5912-9.
14. Prasertsan P, O-Thong S, Birkeland NK. Optimization and microbial community analysis for production of biohydrogen from palm oil mill effluent by thermophilic fermentative process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34:7448-59.
15. Hu B, Chen S. Pretreatment of methanogenic granules for immobilized hydrogen fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007;32:3266-73.
16. Kumar N, Das D. Continuous hydrogen production by Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08, using lignocellulosic materials as solid matrices. Enzyme Microb Technol 2001;29:280-7.
17. Peixoto G, Saavedra NK, Varesche MBA, Zaiat M. Hydrogen production fromsoft-drink wastewater in an upflowanaerobic packed-bed reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36:8953-66.
18. Keskin T, Aksoyek E, Azbar N. Comparative analysis of thermophilic immobilized biohydrogen production using packed materials of ceramic ring and pumice stone. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36:15160-7.
19. Chu CY, Wu SY, Hsieh PC, Lin CY. Biohydrogen production from immobilized cells and suspended sludge systems with condensed molasses fermentation soluble. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36:14078-85.
20. Zhang ZP, Show KY, Tay JH, Liang DT, Lee DJ. Enhanced continuous biohydrogen production by immobilized anaerobic microflora. Energy Fuels 2008;22:87-92.
21. Wu SY, Lin CN, Chang JS, Chang JS. Biohydrogen production with anaerobic sludge immobilized by ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2005;30:1375-81.
22. Fang HHP, Liu H, Zhang T. Characterization of a hydrogen producing granular sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng 2002;78:44-52.
23. Palazzi E, Fabiano B, Perego P. Process development of continuous hydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes in a packed column reactor. Bioprocess Eng 2000;22:205-13.
24. Kim DH, Han SK, Kim SH, Shin HS. Effect of gas sparging on continuous fermentative hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31:2158-69.
25. APHA. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association; 1998. p. 1220.
26. Lo YC, Saratale GD, Chen WM, Bai MD, Chang JS. Isolation of cellulose-hydrolytic bacteria and applications of the cellulolytic enzymes for cellulosic biohydrogen production. Enzyme Microb Technol 2009;44:417-25.
27. Karim K, Hoffmann R, Klasson KT, Al-Dahhan MH. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: effect of mode of mixing. Water Res 2005;39:3597-606.
28. Latif MA, Ghufran R, Wahid ZA, Ahmad A. Integrated application of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor for the treatment of wastewater. Water Res 2011;45:4683-99.
29. Chen Wen-Hsing, Sung Shihwu, Chen Shen-Yi. Biological hydrogen production in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor: pH and cyclic duration effects. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;34:1-8.
30. Chang LS, Lee KS, Lin PJ. Biohydrogen production with fixedbed bioreactors. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2002;27:1167-74.
31. Chu Y, Wei Y, Yuan X, Shi X. Bioconversion of wheat stalk to hydrogen by dark fermentation: effect of different mixed microflora on hydrogen yield and cellulose solubilisation. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:3805-909.
32. Yan RT, Zhu CX, Golemboski C, Chen JS. Expression of solvent-forming enzymes and onset of solvent production in batch culture of Clostridium butyricum. Appl Environ Microbiol 1988;54:642-8.
33. Oh YK, Kim SH, Kim MS, Park S. Thermophilic biohydrogen production from glucose with trickling biofilter. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004;88:690-8.
34. Chen WM, Tseng ZJ, Lee KS, Chang JS. Fermentative hydrogen production with Clostridium butyricum CGS5 isolated from anaerobic sewage sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2005;30:1063-70.
35. Dinopolou G, Rudd T, Lester JN. Anaerobic acidogenesis if complexwastewater: I. The influence of operational parameters on reactor performance. Biotechnol Bioeng 1988;31:958-68.