Frequency of coronary angiography and revascularization among men and women with myocardial infarction and their relationship to mortality at one year: An analysis of the geisinger myocardial infarction cohort

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 14-21

  Skelding, Kimberly A ^a   Boga, Gouthami ^a   Sartorius, Jennifer ^a   Wood, G Craig ^a   Berger, Peter B ^a   Mascarenhas, Vernon H ^a   Good, Christopher W ^a   Scott, Thomas D ^a   Blankenship, James C ^a  

^a GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HUMAN; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; KIDNEY FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MORTALITY; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SURVIVAL;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; DRUG UTILIZATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PENNSYLVANIA; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PLATELET GLYCOPROTEIN GPIIB-IIIA COMPLEX; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84874114076     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joic.12009     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bairey Merz CN, Shaw LJ, Reis SE, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study. Part II. Gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47 (Suppl 3): S21-S29.
2. Shaw LJ, Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study. Part I. Gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47 (Suppl 3): S4-20.
3. Chandra NC, Ziegelstein RC, Rogers WJ, et al. Observations of the treatment of women in the United States with myocardial infarction: A report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158 (9): 981-988. (Pubitemid 28213575)
4. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM,. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med Jul 1991; 325 (4): 221-225.
5. Rathore SS, Chen J, Wang Y, et al. Sex differences in cardiac catheterization: The role of physician gender. JAMA 2001; 286 (22): 2849-2856. (Pubitemid 33126928)
6. Anand SS, Xie CC, Mehta S, et al. Differences in the management and prognosis of women and men who suffer from acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46 (10): 1845-1851. Epub 2005;Oct 18-24. (Pubitemid 41579805)
7. Gan SC, Beaver SK, Houck PM, et al. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality among women and men. N Engl J Med 2000; 343 (1): 8-15. (Pubitemid 30447986)
8. Milcent C, Dormont B, Durand-Zaleski I, et al. Gender differences in hospital mortality and use of percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: Microsimulation analysis of the 1999 nationwide French hospitals database. Circulation 2007; 115 (7): 833-839.
9. Kudenchuk PJ, Maynard C, Martin JS, et al. Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry). Am J Cardiol 1996; 78 (1): 9-14. (Pubitemid 26255442)
10. Giles WH, Anda RF, Casper ML, et al. Race and sex differences in rates of invasive cardiac procedures in US hospitals. Data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155 (3): 318-324.
11. Kostis JB, Wilson AC, O'Dowd K, et al. Sex differences in the management and long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction. A statewide study. MIDAS Study Group. Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System. Circulation 1994; 90 (4): 1715-1730. (Pubitemid 24320918)
12. Demirovic J, Blackburn H, McGovern PG, et al. Sex differences in early mortality after acute myocardial infarction (the Minnesota Heart Survey). Am J Cardiol 1995; 75 (16): 1096-1101.
13. Maynard C, Litwin PE, Martin JS, et al. Gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152 (5): 972-976.
14. Udvarhelyi IS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in the Medicare population. Process of care and clinical outcomes. JAMA 1992; 268 (18): 2530-2536.
15. Peterson ED, Shah BR, Parsons L, et al. Trends in quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J 2008; 156 (6): 1045-1055.
16. Bhatt DL, Roe MT, Peterson ED, et al. Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Results from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative. JAMA 2004; 292 (17): 2096-2104. (Pubitemid 39435100)
17. D'Ascenzo F, Gonella A, Quadri G, et al. Comparison of mortality rates in women versus men presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 651-654.
18. Jackson EA, Moscucci M, Smith DE, et al. The association of sex with outcomes among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction in the contemporary era: Insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2). Am Heart J 2011; 161: 106-112.e1.
19. Vaccarino V, Parsons L, Every NR, et al. Sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 participants. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 217-225. (Pubitemid 29334519)
20. Jneid H, Fonarow GC, Cannon CP, et al. Sex differences in medical care and early death after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2008; 118: 2803-2810.
21. Kaul P, Armstrong PW, Sookram S, et al. Temporal trends in patient and treatment delay among men and women presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 91-97.
22. Lawesson SS, Todt T, Alfredsson J, et al. Gender difference in prevalence and prognostic impact of renal insufficiency in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart 2011; 97: 308-314.
23. De Luca G, Gibson CM, Gyongyosi M, et al. Gender-related differences in outcome after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty and glycoprotein IIb-IIIA inhibitors: Insights from the EGYPT cooperation. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2010; 30: 342-346.
24. Lee LC, Poh KK, Tang T, et al. The impact of gender on the outcomes of invasive versus conservative management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2010; 39: 168-172.
25. Park JS, Kim YJ, Shin DG, et al. Gender differences in clinical features and in-hospital outcomes in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial Infarction: From the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) Study. Clin Cardiol 2010; 33: E1-E6.