A prospective longitudinal study on rotation thromboelastometry in women with uncomplicated pregnancies and postpartum

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 32-36

  Van Rheenen Flach, Leonie E ^a   Zweegman, Sonja ^a   Boersma, Fleur ^b   Lenglet, Joris E ^b   Twisk, Jos W R ^a   Bolte, Antoinette C ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Isala Klinieken ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

coagulation; maternal haemostatic change; pregnancy; rotation thromboelastometry; thromboelastography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HYPERCOAGULABILITY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUERPERIUM; ROTATION THROMBOELASTOMETRY; THROMBOELASTOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BLOOD COAGULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; POSTNATAL CARE; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTERS; PRENATAL CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; THROMBELASTOGRAPHY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874110078     PISSN: 00048666     EISSN: 1479828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12023     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Holmes VA, Wallace JM,. Haemostasis in normal pregnancy: a balancing act? Biochem Soc Trans 2005; 33: 428-432.
2. Luddington RJ,. Thromboelastography/thromboelastometry. Clin Lab Haematol 2005; 27: 81-90.
3. Chitlur M, Sorensen B, Rivard G, et al,. Standardization of thromboelastography: a report from the TEG-ROTEM working group. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 532-537.
4. Othman M, Falcon B, Kadir R,. Global hemostasis in pregnancy: are we using thromboelastography to its full potential? Semin Thromb Hemost 2010; 36: 738-746.
5. ® thromboelastometry. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011; 20: 293-298.
6. Gorton HJ, Warren ER, Simpson NA, et al,. Thrombo-elastography identifies sex-related differences in coagulation. Anesth Analg 2000; 91 (5): 1279-1281.
7. Huissoud C, Carrabin N, Benchaib M, et al,. Coagulation assessment by rotation thrombelastometry in normal pregnancy. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 755-761.
8. Polak F, Kolnikova I, Lips M, et al,. New recommendations for thromboelastography reference ranges for pregnant women. Thromb Res 2011; 128: e14-e17.
9. Sharma SK, Philip J, Wiley J,. Thromboelastographic changes in healthy parturients and postpartum women. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 94.
10. Steer PL, Krantz HB,. Thromboelastography and sonoclot analysis in the healthy parturient. J Clin Anesth 1993; 5: 419-424.
11. Saha P, Stott D, Atalla R,. Haemostatic changes in the puerperium '6 weeks postpartum' (HIP Study)-implication for maternal thromboembolism. BJOG 2009; 116: 1602-1612.
12. Lang T, Bauters A, Braun SL, et al,. Multi-centre investigation on reference ranges for ROTEM thromboelastometry. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2005; 16: 301-310.
13. Ebinger T, Ruland A, Lakner M, Schwaiger M,. Validity, regulatory registration and approval of ROTEM thrombo;?>elastometry. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2010; 21: 106-107.
14. Kitchen D, Kitchen S, Jennings I, et al,. Quality assurance and quality control of thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry: the UK NEQAS for blood coagulation experience. Semin Thromb Hemost 2010; 36: 757-762.
15. Liu J, Yuan E, Lee L,. Gestational age-specific reference intervals for routine haemostatic assays during normal pregnancy. Clin Chim Acta 2012; 413: 258-261.