Performance of a Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformansimmobilizing membrane reactor for syngas upgrading into hydrogen

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 2167-2175

  Zhao, Ya ^a,b   Haddad, Mathieu ^b,c   Cimpoia, Ruxandra ^b   Liu, Zhijun ^a   Guiot, Serge R ^b,c  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Carbon monoxide; Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans; Fouling; Gaseliquid mass transfer; Hollow fiber membrane; Hydrogen

Indexed keywords

BIOFILMS; BIOREACTORS; CARBON; CARBON MONOXIDE; FISCHER-TROPSCH SYNTHESIS; FOULING; HYDROGEN; LIQUIDS; MASS TRANSFER; MEMBRANE FOULING;

CARBOXYDOTHERMUS HYDROGENOFORMANS; HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANES; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS; THREE ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; VOLATILE SUSPENDED SOLIDS;

MEMBRANES;

EID: 84874106658     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.038     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Das D, Veziroglu TN. Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2001; 26:13-28.
2. Balat H, Kirtay E. Hydrogen from biomass - present scenario and future prospects. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:7416-26.
3. Song C. Introduction to hydrogen and syngas production and purification technologies. In: Liu K, Song C, Subramani VJ, editors. Hydrogen and syngas production and purification technologies. Hobocken, NJ: Wiley & Sons; 2010. p. 1-13.
4. Rezaiyan J, Cheremisinoff NP. Gasification technologies: a primer for engineers and scientists. Portland, OR: Taylor & Francis; 2005.
5. Torres W, Pansare SS, Goodwin JGJ. Hot gas removal of tars, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide from biomass gasification gas. Catal Rev 2007;49:407-56.
6. Newsome D. The wateregas shift reaction. Catal Rev 1980;21: 275-318.
7. Milliken J, Myers DJ. Alternative catalysts offer high activity, low cost. Argonne National Laboratory. Available from: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/ vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/success/water-gas3-29-01c.pdf; 2001 [updated April 2001; cited September 28th, 2012].
8. Mohammadi M, Najafpour GD, Younesi H, Lahijani P, Uzir MH, Mohamed AR. Bioconversion of synthesis gas to second generation biofuels: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011;15:4255-73.
9. Svetlichnyi VA, Sokolova TG, Gerhardt M, Ringpfeil M, Kostrikina NA, Zavarzin GA. Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans gen.nov., sp.nov., a CO-utilizing thermophilic anaerobic bacterium from hydrothermal environments of Kunashir Island. Syst Appl Microbiol 1991;14:254-60.
10. Wang J, Wan W. Factors influencing fermentative hydrogen production: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34:799-811.
11. 2 production by strictly anaerobic lithoautotrophic thermophilic bacterium Carboxydothermus hydrogenus DSM6008 isolated from a hot swamp. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1991;83:267-72.
12. Henstra AM, Sipma J, Rinzema A, Stams AJM. Microbiology of synthesis gas fermentation for biofuel production. Cur Op Biotech 2007;18:200-6.
13. Karoor S, Sirkar KK. Gas absorption studies in microporous hollow fiber membrane modules. Ind Eng Chem Res 1993;32: 674-84.
14. 2 removal from simulated flue gas through hollow fiber membrane contactor. J Membr Sci 2008;312:6-14.
15. Stams AJM, Van Dijk JB, Dijkema C, Plugge CM. Growth of syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria with fumarate in the absence of methanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993;59:1114-9.
16. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenberg AE, editors. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation; 2005.
17. Roels JA. Energetics and kinetics in biotechnology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical Press; 1983.
18. Ruiz Careri MN. Advantages and disadvantages of microporous membranes in a hollow fiber bioreactor for space applications. Master thesis. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University; 2005.
19. Joannis C, Delia ML, Riba JP. Comparison of four methods for quantification of biofilms in biphasic cultures. Biotechnol Tech 1998;12:777-82.
20. Sauer K. The genomics and proteomics of biofilm formation. Genome Biol 2003;4.
21. Karatan E, Watnick P. Signals, regulatory networks, and materials that build and break bacterial biofilms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2009;73:310-47.
22. Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG, Costerton JW. Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annu Rev Microbiol 2002;56:187-209.
23. Barker DJ, Stuckey DC. A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems. Water Res 1999;33:3063-82.
24. Munasinghe PC, Khanal SK. Syngas fermentation to biofuel: evaluation of carbon monoxide mass transfer coefficient (kLa) in different reactor configurations. Biotechnol Prog 2010; 26:1616-21.
25. Bouhabila EH, Ben Aïm R, Buisson H. Fouling characterization in membrane bioreactors. Sep Purif Tech 2001;22-23:123-32.
26. Miura Y, Watanabe Y, Okabe S. Membrane biofouling in pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater: impact of biofilm formation. Environ Sci Technol 2007;41:632-8.
27. Sombatsompop K, Visvanathan C, Ben Aim R. Evaluation of biofouling phenomenon in suspended and attached growth membrane bioreactor systems. Desalination 2006;201: 138-49.
28. Zhang JS, Chua HC, Zhou JT, Fane AG. Factors affecting the membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 2006;284:54-66.
29. Liu H, Yang F, Wang T, Liu Q, Hu S. Carbon membraneaerated biofilm reactor for synthetic wastewater treatment. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 2007;30:217-24.
30. Huang LN, De Wever H, Diels L. Diverse and distinct bacterial communities induced biofilm fouling in membrane bioreactors operated under different conditions. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:8360-6.
31. Chang I-S, Le Clech P, Jefferson B, Judd S. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J Environ Eng 2002;128:1018-29.
32. Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM. Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology. Biotech Bioeng 1999;65: 83-92.
33. 2 by Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans. Appl Microbiol Biotech 2011;91:1677-84.