The assessment of the effects of investment support measures of the rural development programmes: The case of the Czech Republic

Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 35-48

  Medonos, T ^b   Ratinger, T ^a   Hruska M ^b   Spicka J ^b  

^a Technology Centre   (Czech Republic)

^b Ustav zemedelske Potravinarske a Environmentalni techniky   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Counterfactual analysis; Direct and indirect effects; Investment support; Propensity score matching

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; INVESTMENT; MARKET TRANSITION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RURAL DEVELOPMENT;

CZECH REPUBLIC;

EID: 84874061206     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18041930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bašek, V. et al. České zemědělství šest let po vstupu do Evropské unie - The Czech agriculture six years after EU accession. Research study of Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, 2010.
2. Božík, M. Hodnotenie efektov opatrení podpory investícií Programu rovoje vidieka 2007-2013 na úrovni fariem, Economics in Agriculture, 2011. XI., N° 1, p. 58-71.
3. Bradley, D., Dwyer, J., Hill, B. The Evaluation of Rural Development Policy in the EU. EuroChoices. 2010, 9 (1), p. 15-20. ISSN: 1478-0917
4. Čechura, L. Theoretical-empirical analysis of the role of the SGAFF in financing of farmers' activities. Agricultural Economics, 2008, 54 (10), 476 - 488. ISSN: 0139-570X.
5. Caliendo, M., Kopeinig, S. Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching, IZA DP, 2005, No. 1588. p. 28.
6. Dwyer, J., Bradley, D., Hill, B. Towards an enhanced evaluation of European rural development policy - Reflections on United Kingdom experience. Economie Rurale, 2008, 307, p. 53-79. ISSN: 2105-2581.
7. EC. Handbook on, Guidance document (including all Guidance Notes A-O), 2006, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/eval/guidance/document_en.pdf.
8. Gujarati, D., N. Basic Econometrics, McGraw-Hill, 1988. p. 467-500. ISBN: 978-0-07-233542-2.
9. Janda, K. and Ratinger, T. Strategies for Capital Formation in Agricultural Cooperatives - The experience of the Czech Republic. In: Transformation Strategies with Particular Reference to Capital Formation in Agricultural Cooperatives in CEEC, FAO. 1997.
10. Janda, K. The Comparative Statistics of the Effects of Credit Guarantees and Subsidies in the Competitive Lending Market, Prague Social Science Studies, Economics series EC-007. 2006.
11. Khandker, S., R. Koowal, G., B., Samad, A., H. Handbook on Impact Evaluation; Quantitative Methods and Practices, World Bank 52099. 2010, p. 241. ISBN: 978-0-8213-8028-4.
12. Medonos, T. (2007) Investment activity and financial constraint of the Czech corporate farms). Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Agriculture, Prague. 2007.
13. Michalek, J. Quantitative Tools for ex-post evaluation of RD Programmes. Working Paper Advancedeval, deliverable No. 2. Version: March 2007.
14. Psaltopoulos, D., Balamou, E., Skuras, D., Ratinger, T., Sieber, S. Modelling the impacts of CAP Pillar 1 and 2 measures on local economies in Europe: Testing a case study-based CGE-model approach. Journal of policy modeling, 2011, 33 (1), p. 53-69. ISSN: 1873-8060.
15. Pufahl, A., CH.R. Weiss Evaluating the Effects of Farm Programmes: Results from Propensity Score Matching. In: European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2009, 36 (1), 79-101. ISSN 1464-3618.
16. Rubin, D.B. Bias Reduction Using Mahalanobis-Metric Matching. Biometrics, 1980, 36, 293-298. ISSN: 1541-0420.
17. Trzeciak-Duval, A. Agriculture finance and credit infastructure - conditions, policies and channels. Agricultural Economics, 2003, 49 (3), p. 106-112. ISSN: 0139-570X.