Comparison of five classification systems for interpreting electronic fetal monitoring in predicting neonatal status at birth

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 487-490

  Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria ^a   Seravalli, Viola ^a   Cordisco, Adalgisa ^a   Consorti, Giada ^a   Mecacci, Federico ^a   Rizzello, Francesca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cardiotocography; CTG classification systems; Electronic monitoring; Umbilical artery pH

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACIDEMIA; APGAR SCORE; ARTERIAL PH; ARTICLE; BIRTH; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DUBLIN FETAL HEART RATE MONITORING TRIAL CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS DISEASE; FETUS ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NEWBORN; NEWBORN CARE; PARER AND IKEDA CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REFERENCE VALUE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROYAL COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS CLASSIFICATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNAECOLOGISTS OF CANADA CLASSIFICATION; STANDARDIZATION; UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD;

APGAR SCORE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; FETAL MONITORING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INFANT, NEWBORN; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT (U.S.); PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UMBILICAL ARTERIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84874059301     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.735726     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Pereira M, Boylan P, Chalmers T. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152:425-539.
2. Boylan P. Intrapartum fetal monitoring. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1987;1:73-95.
3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2001). The use of electronic fetal monitoring: The use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance. Evidence-based clinical guideline number 8. Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. London, U.K.: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press.
4. Liston R, Sawchuck D, Young D; Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada; British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:S3-56.
5. Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:661-666.
6. Parer JT, Ikeda T. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:26.e1-26.e6.
7. Fleiss JL. The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1981. pp 212-236.
8. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:192-202.
9. Freeman RK, Nageotte MP. Comments on American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin no. 106. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:411-412.
10. Bannerman CG, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, Hutchinson M, Blackwell S. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:288.e1-288.e4.
11. Coletta J, Murphy E, Rubeo Z, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. The 5-tier system of assessing fetal heart rate tracings is superior to the 3-tier system in identifying fetal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:226.e1-226.e5.
12. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. Umbilical cord blood gas and acid-base analysis (ACOG Committee Opinion No. 348). Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1319-1322.
13. Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. Short-term fetal heart rate variation, decelerations, and umbilical flow velocity waveforms before labor. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:673-678.