The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements

Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Heinrich, H ^a   Fruehauf, H ^b   Sauter, M ^a   Steingotter A ^a,c   Fried, M ^a,d   Schwizer, W ^a,d   Fox, M ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology   (Switzerland)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

High resolution anorectal manometry; Instruction; Verbal feedback; Voluntary anorectal function

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANAL CANAL; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSTIPATION; DEFECATION; DEFECATION DISORDER; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANOMETRY; MOTIVATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM; SENSOR; VERBALIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONSTIPATION; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874023020     PISSN: 13501925     EISSN: 13652982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12038     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Enck P, Van Der Voort IR, Klosterhalfen S. Biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence and constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21: 1133-41.
2. Koutsomanis D, Lennard-Jones JE, Roy AJ, Kamm MA. Controlled randomised trial of visual biofeedback versus muscle training without a visual display for intractable constipation. Gut 1995; 37: 95-9.
3. Byrne CM, Solomon MJ, Rex J, Young JM, Heggie D, Merlino C. Telephone vs. face-to-face biofeedback for fecal incontinence: comparison of two techniques in 239 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 2281-8.
4. Shim LSE, Jones M, Prott GM, Morris LI, Kellow JE, Malcolm A. Predictors of outcome of anorectal biofeedback therapy in patients with constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 1245-51.
5. Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A, Wexner SD. Biofeedback therapy in the colon and rectal practice. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2003; 28: 47-61.
6. Fernández-Fraga X, Azpiroz F, Aparici A, Casaus M, Malagelada J-R. Predictors of response to biofeedback treatment in anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1218-25.
7. Cali RL, Blatchford GJ, Perry RE, Pitsch RM, Thorson AG, Christensen MA. Normal variation in anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 1161-4.
8. Eckardt VF, Elmer T. Reliability of anal pressure measurements. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 72-7.
9. Felt-Bersma RJ, Gort G, Meuwissen SG. Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: a problem of range. Hepatogastroenterology 1991; 38: 444-9.
10. Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Lucas J et al. Defecatory disorders, anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction: a polygamy?Radiologic and manometric studies in 41 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992; 7: 102-7.
11. Wald A, Caruana BJ, Freimanis MG, Bauman DH, Hinds JP. Contributions of evacuation proctography and anorectal manometry to evaluation of adults with constipation and defecatory difficulty. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35: 481-7.
12. Rao SS, Azpiroz F, Diamant N, Enck P, Tougas G, Wald A. Minimum standards of anorectal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2002; 14: 553-9.
13. Pehl C, Enck P, Franke A et al. Empfehlungen zur Anorektalen Manometrie im Erwachsenenalter. Z Gastroenterol 2007; 45: 397.
14. Azpiroz F, Enck P, Whitehead WE. Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 232-40.
15. Gruppo Lombardo per lo Studio della Motilità. Anorectal manometry with water-perfused catheter in healthy adults with no functional bowel disorders. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 220-5.
16. Barnett JL, Hasler WL, Camilleri M. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 1999;116: 732-5.
17. Scott SM, Gladman MA. Manometric, sensorimotor and neurophysiologic evaluation of anorectal function. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008; 37: 511-38.
18. Norton C, Gibbs A, Kamm MA. Randomized, controlled trial of anal electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 190-6.
19. Norton C, Chelvanayagam S, Wilson-Barnett J, Redfern S, Kamm MA. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 1320-9.
20. Rao SSC, Seaton K, Miller M et al. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 331-8.
21. Norton C, Hosker G, Brazzelli M. Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD002111.
22. Rao SS, Welcher KD, Leistikow JS. Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 1042-50.
23. Rao SS, Valestin J, Brown CK, Zimmerman B, Schulze K. Long-term efficacy of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation: randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 890-6.
24. Chiarioni G, Scattolini C, Bonfante F, Vantini I. Liquid stool incontinence with severe urgency: anorectal function and effective biofeedback treatment. Gut 1993; 34: 1576-80.
25. Ghosh SK, Kahrilas PJ, Lodhia N, Pandolfino JE. Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293: G1023-8.
26. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJ. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(Suppl 1): 57-65.
27. Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice. Gut 2008; 57: 405-23.
28. Jones MP, Post J, Crowell MD. High-resolution manometry in the evaluation of anorectal disorders: a simultaneous comparison with water-perfused manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 850-5.
29. Bharucha AE, Noelting J, Ratuapli SK et al. Tu2000 high resolution manometry in healthy women: normal values and effects of age. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: S897-8.
30. Ryhammer AM, Laurberg S, Hermann AP. Test-retest repeatability of anorectal physiology tests in healthy volunteers. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 287-92.
31. Goke M, Donner K, Ewe K, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH. Intraindividual variability of anorectal manometry parameters. Z Gastroenterol 1992; 30: 243-6.
32. Bharucha AE, Seide B, Fox JC, Zinsmeister AR. Day-to-day reproducibility of anorectal sensorimotor assessments in healthy subjects. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004; 16: 241-50.
33. Rogers J, Laurberg S, Misiewicz JJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal physiology validated: a repeatability study of the motor and sensory tests of anorectal function. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 607-9.
34. Taylor BM, Beart RW Jr, Phillips SF. Longitudinal and radial variations of pressure in the human anal sphincter. Gastroenterology 1984; 86: 693-7.
35. McHugh SM, Diamant NE. Anal canal pressure profile: a reappraisal as determined by rapid pullthrough technique. Gut 1987; 28: 1234-41.
36. Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. 3D-high resolution manometry of the esophagogastric junction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: e461-9.
37. Raizada V, Bhargava V, Karsten A, Mittal RK. Functional morphology of anal sphincter complex unveiled by high definition anal manometery and three dimensional ultrasound imaging. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 1013-9.