Proteomics of nonmodel plant species

Proteomics

Volumn 13, Issue 3-4, 2013, Pages 663-673

  Champagne, Antoine ^a   Boutry, Marc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Complex sample fractionation; Next generation sequencing; Nonmodel plants; Plant proteomics; Proteogenomics

Indexed keywords

AMPHOLYTE; COMPLEMENTARY DNA; CYTOCHROME P450; DETERGENT; KERATIN; PLASTICIZER; TRANSCRIPTOME; TRYPSIN;

ARABIDOPSIS; BARREL MEDIC; CELL FRACTIONATION; DATA BASE; EXON; GEL PERMEATION CHROMATOGRAPHY; GENE SEQUENCE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; OPEN READING FRAME; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; RNA SEQUENCE; TISSUE HOMOGENATE;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84873992298     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200312     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408, 796-815.
2. Cook, D. R., Medicago truncatula-a model in the making! Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1999, 2, 301-304.
3. van der Heijden, R., Jacobs, D. I., Snoeijer, W., Hallard, D. et al., The Catharanthus alkaloids: pharmacognosy and biotechnology. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 607-628.
4. Tissier, A., Glandular trichomes: what comes after expressed sequence tags? Plant J. 2012, 70, 51-68.
5. Bak, S., Beisson, F., Bishop, G., Hamberger, B. et al., Cytochromes P450. Arabidopsis Book 2011, 9, e0144.
6. Goff, S. A., Ricke, D., Lan, T. H., Presting, G. et al., A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 2002, 296, 92-100.
7. Yu, J., Hu, S., Wang, J., Wong, G. K.-S. et al., A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science 2002, 296, 79-92.
8. Yu, J., Wang, J., Lin, W., Li, S. et al., The genomes of Oryza sativa: a history of duplications. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3, e38.
9. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 2005, 436, 793-800.
10. Strickler, S. R., Bombarely, A., Mueller, A. A., Designing a transcriptome next-generation sequencing project for a nonmodel plant species. Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 257-266.
11. Ward, J. A., Ponnala, L., Weber, C. A., Strategies for transcriptome analysis in nonmodel plants. Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 267-276.
12. Lopez-Casado, G., Covey, P. A., Bedinger, P. A., Mueller, L. A. et al., Enabling proteomic studies with RNA-Seq: the proteome of tomato pollen as a test case. Proteomics 2012, 12, 761-774.
13. Renuse, S., Chaerkady, R., Pandey, A., Proteogenomics. Proteomics 2011, 11, 620-630.
14. Liska, A. J., Shevchenko, A., Expanding the organismal scope of proteomics: cross-species protein identification by mass spectrometry and its implications. Proteomics 2003, 3, 19-28.
15. Wright, J. C., Beynonet, R. J., Hubbard, S. J., Cross species proteomics. Meth. Mol. Biol. 2010, 604, 123-135.
16. Witters, E., Laukens, K., Deckers, P., van Dongen, W. et al., Fast liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry peptide sequencing for cross-species protein identification. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17, 2188-2194.
17. Huang, M., Chen, T., Chan, Z. L., An evaluation for cross-species proteomics research by publicly available expressed sequence tag database search using tandem mass spectral data. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 20, 2635-2640.
18. Bräutigam, A., Shrestha, R. P., Whitten, D., Wilkerson, C. G. et al., Low-coverage massively parallel pyrosequencing of cDNAs enables proteomics in non-model species: comparison of a species-specific database generated by pyrosequencing with databases from related species for proteome analysis of pea chloroplast envelopes. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 136, 44-53.
19. Gan, X., Stegle, O., Behr, J., Steffen, J. G. et al., Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2011, 477, 419-423.
20. Champagne, A., Rischer, H., Oksman-Caldentey, K.-M., Boutry, M., In-depth proteome mining of cultured Catharanthus roseus cells identifies candidate proteins involved in the synthesis and transport of secondary metabolites. Proteomics. 2012, 12, 3536-3547.
21. Habermann, B., Oegema, J., Sunyaev, S., Shevchenko, A., The power and the limitations of cross-species protein identification by mass spectrometry-driven sequence similarity searches. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 238-249.
22. Junqueira, M., Spirin, V., Balbuena, T. S., Waridel, P. et al., Separating the wheat from the chaff: unbiased filtering of background tandem mass spectra improves protein identification. J. Proteom. Res. 2008, 7, 3382-3395.
23. Bern, M., Goldberg, D., McDonald, W. H., Yates, J. R. 3rd., Automatic quality assessment of peptide tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, I49-I54.
24. Savitski, M. M., Nielsen, M. L., Zubarev, R. A., New data base-independent, sequence tag-based scoring of peptide MS/MS data validates Mowse scores, recovers below threshold data, singles out modified peptides, and assesses the quality of MS/MS techniques. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1180-1188.
25. Shevchenko, A., Valcu, C. M., Junqueira, M., Tools for exploring the proteomosphere. J. Proteomics 2009, 72, 137-144.
26. Allmer, J., Algorithms for the de novo sequencing of peptides from tandem mass spectra. Exp. Rev. Proteomics 2011, 8, 645-657
27. Hughes, C., Ma, B., Lajoie, G. A., De novo sequencing methods in proteomics. Meth. Mol. Biol. 2010, 604, 105-121.
28. Seidler, J., Zinn, N., Boehm, M. E., Lehmann, W. D., De novo sequencing of peptides by MS/MS. Proteomics 2010, 10, 634-649.
29. Granvogl, B., Reisinger, V., Eichacker, A., Mapping the proteome of thylakoid membranes by de novo sequencing of intermembrane peptide domains. Proteomics 2006, 6, 3681-3695.
30. Jorge, I., Navarro, R. M., Lenz, C., Ariza, D. et al., The Holm Oak leaf proteome: analytical and biological variability in the protein expression level assessed by 2-DE and protein identification tandem mass spectrometry de novo sequencing and sequence similarity searching. Proteomics 2005, 5, 222-234.
31. Liska, A. J., Shevchenko, A., Combining mass spectrometry with database interrogation strategies in proteomics. Trends Anal. Chem. 2003, 22, 291-298.
32. Liska, A. J., Shevchenko, A., Pick, U., Katz, A., Enhanced photosynthesis and redox energy production contribute to salinity tolerance in Dunaliella as revealed by homology-based proteomics. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 2806-2817.
33. Samyn, B., Sergeant, K., Carpentier, S., Debyser, G. et al., Functional proteome analysis of the banana plant (Musa spp.) using de novo sequence analysis of derivatized peptides. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 70-80.
34. Shevchenko, A., Sunyaev, S., Loboda, A., Shevchenko, A. et al., Charting the proteomes of organisms with unsequenced genomes by MALDI-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and BLAST homology searching. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1917-1926.
35. Mackey, A. J., Haystead, T. A. J., Pearson, W. R., Getting more from less: algorithms for rapid protein identification with multiple short peptide sequences. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2002, 1, 139-147.
36. Thomas, H., Shevchenko, A., Simplified validation of borderline hits of database searches. Proteomics 2008, 8, 4173-4177.
37. Wielsch, N., Thomas, H., Surendranath, V., Waridel, P. et al., Rapid validation of protein identifications with the borderline statistical confidence via de novo sequencing and MS BLAST searches. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 2448-2456.
38. Grossmann, J., Fischer, B., Baerenfaller, K., Owiti, J. et al., A workflow to increase the detection rate of proteins from unsequenced organisms in highthroughput proteomics experiments. Proteomics 2007, 7, 4245-4254.
39. Vertommen, A., Møller, A. L. B., Cordewener, J. H. G., Swennen, R. et al., A workflow for peptide-based proteomics in a poorly sequenced plant: a case study on the plasma membrane proteome of banana. J. Proteomics 2011, 74, 1218-1229.
40. Waridel, P., Frank, A., Thomas, H., Surendranath, V. et al., Sequence similarity-driven proteomics in organisms with unknown genomes by LC-MS/MS and automated de novo sequencing. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2318-2329.
41. Ståhl, P. L., Lundeberg, J., Toward the single-hour high-quality genome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012, 81, 359-378.
42. Henson, J., Tischler, G., Ning, Z., Next-generation sequencing and large genome assemblies. Pharmacogenomics 2012, 13, 901-915.
43. Hamilton, J. P., Buell, C. R., Advances in plant genome sequencing. Plant J. 2012, 70, 177-190.
44. Schneider, G. F., Dekker, C., DNA sequencing with nanopores. Nature Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 326-328.
45. Schilmiller, A. L., Miner, D. P., Larson, M., Mc Dowell, E. et al., Studies of a biochemical factory: tomato trichome deep expressed sequence tag sequencing and proteomics. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1212-1223.
46. Castellana, N. E, Payne, S. H., Shen, Z., Stanke, M. et al., Discovery and revision of Arabidopsis genes by proteogenomics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 21034-21038.
47. Helmy, M., Tomita, M., Ishihama, Y., OryzaPG-DB: rice proteome database based on shotgun proteogenomics. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 63.
48. Baerenfaller, K., Grossmann, J., Grobei, M. A., Hull, R. et al., Genome-scale proteomics reveals Arabidopsis thaliana gene models and proteome dynamics. Science 2008, 320, 938-941.
49. Grobei, M. A., Qeli, E., Brunner, E., Rehrauer, H. et al., Deterministic protein inference for shotgun proteomic data provides new insights into Arabidopsis pollen development and function. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1786-1800.
50. Galperin, M. Y., Koonin, E. V., From complete genome sequence to 'complete' understanding? Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 398-406.
51. Van Cutsem, E., Simonart, G., Degand, H., Faber, A. M. et al., Gel-based and gel-free proteomic analysis of Nicotiana tabacum trichomes identifies proteins involved in secondary metabolism and in the (a)biotic stress response. Proteomics 2011, 11, 440-454.
52. Haynes, P. A., Roberts, T. H., Subcellular shotgun proteomics in plants: looking beyond the usual suspects. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2963-2975.
53. Lee, Y. H., Tan, H. T., Chung, M. C. M., Subcellular fractionation methods and strategies for proteomics. Proteomics 2010, 10, 3935-3956.
54. Agrawal, G. K., Jwa, N.-S., Lebrun, M.-H., Job, D. et al., Plant secretome: Unlocking secrets of the secreted proteins. Proteomics 2010, 10, 799-827.
55. Hanton, S. L., Bortolotti, L. E., Renna, L., Stefano, G. et al., Crossing the divide-transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and golgi apparatus in plants. Traffic 2005, 6, 267-277.
56. Hicks, G. R., Raikhel, N. V., Advances in dissecting endomembrane trafficking with small molecules. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 706-713.
57. Ly, L., Wasinger, V. C., Protein and peptide fractionation, enrichment and depletion: tools for the complex proteome. Proteomics 2011, 11, 513-534.
58. Yates, J. R. 3rd, Ruse, C. I., Nakorchevsky, A., Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 11, 49-79.
59. Chevalier, F., Highlights on the capacities of "Gel-based" proteomics. Proteom. Sci. 2010, 8, 1-23.
60. Malerod, H., Lundanes, E., Greibrokk, T., Recent advances in on-line multidimensional liquid chromatography. Anal. Methods 2010, 2, 110-122.
61. Carpentier, S. C., Panis, B., Vertommen, A., Swennen, R. et al., Proteome analysis of non-model plants: a challenging but powerful approach. Mass Spec. Rev. 2008, 27, 354-377.
62. Remmerie, N., de Vijlder, T., Laukens, K., Dang, T. H. et al., Next generation functional proteomics in non-model plants: a survey on techniques and applications for the analysis of protein complexes and post-translational modifications. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1192-1218.
63. Vestal, M. L., The future of biological mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2011, 22, 953-959.
64. Yang, Y., Zhang, S., Howe, K., Wilson, D. B., A comparison of nLC-ESI-MS/MS and nLC-MALDI-MS/MS for GeLC-based protein identification and iTRAQ-based shotgun quantitative proteomics. J. Biomol. Tech. 2007, 18, 226-237.
65. Angel, T. E., Aryal, U. K., Hengel, S. M., Baker, E. S. et al., Mass spectrometry based proteomics: existing capabilities and future directions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3912-3928.
66. Han, X., Aslanian, A., Yates, J. R. 3rd, Mass spectrometry for proteomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 12, 483-90.