Consequences of paternal care on pectoral fin allometry in a desert-dwelling fish

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 513-518

  van Lieshout, Emile ^a   Svensson, P Andreas ^b   Wong, Bob B M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Allometry; Fin; Fish; Natural selection; Scaling; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; BODY SIZE; FITNESS; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NATURAL SELECTION; PARENTAL CARE; PERCIFORM; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

CALLOGOBIUS ATRATUS; CHLAMYDOGOBIUS EREMIUS; GOBIIDAE;

EID: 84873989260     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-012-1470-9     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40: 804-816.
2. Bakker TCM, Mundwiler B (1999) Pectoral fin size in a fish species with paternal care: a condition-dependent sexual trait revealing infection status. Freshw Biol 41: 543-551.
3. Baldauf S, Bakker T, Herder F, Kullmann H, Thünken T (2010) Male mate choice scales female ornament allometry in a cichlid fish. BMC Evol Biol 10: 301.
4. Blake RW (1979) The mechanics of labriform locomotion I. Labriform locomotion in the angelfish (Pterophyllum eimekei): an analysis of the power stroke. J Exp Biol 82: 255-271.
5. Bonduriansky R (2007a) Sexual selection and allometry: a critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas. Evolution 61: 838-849.
6. Bonduriansky R (2007b) The evolution of condition-dependent sexual dimorphism. Am Nat 169: 9-19.
7. Bonduriansky R, Day T (2003) The evolution of static allometry in sexually selected traits. Evolution 57: 2450-2458.
8. Bonduriansky R, Rowe L (2005) Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae). Evolution 59: 138-151.
9. Cuervo JJ, Møller AP (2009) The allometric pattern of sexually size dimorphic feather ornaments and factors affecting allometry. J Evol Biol 22: 1503-1515.
10. Drucker E, Jensen J (1996) Pectoral fin locomotion in the striped surfperch. II. Scaling swimming kinematics and performance at a gait transition. J Exp Biol 199: 2243-2252.
11. Egset CK, Hansen TF, Le Rouzic A, Bolstad GH, Rosenqvist G, Pélabon C (2012) Artificial selection on allometry: change in elevation but not slope. J Evol Biol 25: 938-948.
12. Emlen DJ (1996) Artificial selection on horn length-body size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Evolution 50(3): 1219-1230.
13. Engqvist L (2005) The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim Behav 70: 967-971.
14. Farrell-Gray CC, Gotelli NJ (2005) Allometric exponents support a 3/4-power scaling law. Ecology 86: 2083-2087.
15. Ghiselin MT (1974) The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. University of California Press, Berkeley.
16. Glover CJM (1982) Adaptations of fish in arid Australia. In: Barker WR, Greenslade PJM (eds) Evolution of the flora and fauna of arid Australia. Peacock, Adelaide, pp 241-246.
17. Goldbogen JA, Potvin J, Shadwick RE (2010) Skull and buccal cavity allometry increase mass-specific engulfment capacity in fin whales. Proc R Soc Lond B 277: 861-868.
18. Green AJ (1992) Positive allometry is likely with mate choice, competitive display and other functions. Anim Behav 43: 170-172.
19. Green AJ (1999) Allometry of genitalia in insects and spiders: one size does not fit all. Evolution 53: 1621-1624.
20. Hankison SJ, Ptacek MB (2007) Within and between species variation in male mating behaviors in the Mexican sailfin mollies Poecilia velifera and P. petenensis. Ethology 113: 802-812.
21. Hansen TF, Bartoszek K (2012) Interpreting the evolutionary regression: the interplay between observational and biological errors in phylogenetic comparative studies. Syst Biol 61: 413-425.
22. Jones JC, Reynolds JD (1999) Costs of egg ventilation for male common gobies breeding in conditions of low dissolved oxygen. Anim Behav 57: 181-188.
23. Karlsson B, Wickman PO (1990) Increase in reproductive effort as explained by body size and resource allocation in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria (L.). Funct Ecol 4: 609-617.
24. Klug H, Lindström K, Kokko H (2010) Who to include in measures of sexual selection is no trivial matter. Ecol Lett 13: 1094-1102.
25. Kodric-Brown A, Sibly RM, Brown JH (2006) The allometry of ornaments and weapons. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 8733-8738.
26. Kotiaho JS (2000) Testing the assumptions of conditional handicap theory: costs and condition dependence of a sexually selected trait. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48: 188-194.
27. Künzler R, Bakker TCM (2000) Pectoral fins and paternal quality in sticklebacks. Proc R Soc Lond B 267: 999-1004.
28. Lindström K (1992) The effect of resource holding potential, nest size and information about resource quality on the outcome of intruder-owner conflicts in the sand goby. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30: 53-58.
29. Lindström K, St. Mary C, Pampoulie C (2006) Sexual selection for male parental care in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60: 46-51.
30. Maie T, Schoenfuss HL, Blob RW (2007) Ontogenetic scaling of body proportions in waterfall-climbing gobiid fishes from Hawai'i and Dominica: implications for locomotor function. Copeia 2007: 755-764.
31. Marshall LD (1990) Intraspecific variation in reproductive effort by female Parapediasia teterrella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and its relation to body size. Can J Zool 68: 44-48.
32. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
33. Roff DA, Mousseau TA (1987) Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58: 103-118.
34. Rowe L, Houle D (1996) The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 1415-1421.
35. Ruff CB (2000) Body size, body shape, and long bone strength in modern humans. J Hum Evol 38: 269-290.
36. Schluter D (1988) Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849-861.
37. Simmons LW, Tomkins JL (1996) Sexual selection and the allometry of earwig forceps. Evol Ecol 10: 97-104.
38. Smith RJ (1994) Degrees of freedom in interspecific allometry: an adjustment for the effects of phylogenetic constraint. Am J Phys Anthropol 93: 95-107.
39. Smith RJ (2009) Use and misuse of the reduced major axis for line-fitting. Am J Phys Anthropol 140: 476-486.
40. Svensson PA, Lehtonen TK, Wong BBM (2012) A high aggression strategy for smaller males. PLoS One 7: e43121.
41. Sweeney BW, Vannote RL, Dodds PJ (1986) Effects of temperature and food quality on growth and development of a mayfly, Leptophlebia intermedia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43: 12-18.
42. Symons N, Svensson PA, Wong BBM (2011) Do male desert gobies compromise offspring care to attract additional mating opportunities? PLoS One 6: e20576.
43. Tomkins JL, Radwan J, Kotiaho JS, Tregenza T (2004) Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 323-328.
44. Vogel S (1994) Life in moving fluids: the physical biology of flow, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
45. Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81: 259-291.
46. Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, Taskinen S (2012) smatr 3-an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Method Ecol Evol 3: 257-259.
47. Wickman P-O, Karlsson B (1989) Abdomen size, body size and the reproductive effort of insects. Oikos 56: 209-214.
48. Wong BBM, Svensson PA (2009) Strategic male signalling effort in a desert-dwelling fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63: 543-549.