Nanofiber size-dependent sensitivity of fibroblast directionality to the methodology for scaffold alignment

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3982-3990

  Chaurey, Vasudha ^a   Block, Frank ^a   Su, Yi Hsuan ^a,b   Chiang, Po Chieh ^b   Botchwey, Edward ^c   Chou, Chia Fu ^b   Swami, Nathan S ^a  

^a University of Virginia   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (Taiwan)

^c University of Virginia   (United States)

Author keywords

Fibroblast; Nanopatterning; Nanotopography; Scaffold; Self Assembly

Indexed keywords

ALIGNMENT; CELL CULTURE; CELL MEMBRANES; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROSPINNING; FIBERS; FIBROBLASTS; NANOFIBERS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

ALIGNED FIBERS; ALIGNED NANOFIBERS; ANGULAR DEVIATIONS; ELECTROSPUN NANOFIBERS; FIBER SIZES; FIBROBLAST; NANO IMPRINT; NANOPATTERNING; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; SIZE DEPENDENT;

SELF ASSEMBLY;

MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOFIBER; POLYLYSINE; SOLVENT; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL ADHESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIELECTRIC CONSTANT; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRON BEAM; ELECTROSPINNING; FIBROBLAST; FIELD EMISSION SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE TENSION; SYNTHESIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION; ANIMAL; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; ELECTRICITY; METHODOLOGY; PARTICLE SIZE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; ELECTRICITY; FIBROBLASTS; MICE; NANOFIBERS; NIH 3T3 CELLS; PARTICLE SIZE; SOLVENTS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84873956836     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.041     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Laurencin CT, Freeman JW. Ligament tissue engineering: An evolutionary materials science approach. Biomaterials 2005;26(36):7530-6. (Pubitemid 41187552)
2. Lee CH, Shin HJ, Cho IH, Kang Y-M, Kim IA, Park K-D, et al. Nanofiber alignment and direction of mechanical strain affect the ECM production of human ACL fibroblast. Biomaterials 2005;26(11):1261-70. (Pubitemid 39314500)
3. Lu H, Subramony S, Boushell M, Zhang X. Tissue engineering strategies for the regeneration of orthopedic interfaces. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:2142-54.
4. Neal R, Tholpady S, Foley P, Swami N, Ogle R, Botchwey E. Alignment and composition of laminin-polycaprolactone nanofiber blends enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012;100:406-23.
5. Xu CY, Inai R, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. Aligned biodegradable nanofibrous structure: A potential scaffold for blood vessel engineering. Biomaterials 2004;25(5):877-86. (Pubitemid 37371995)
6. Bashur CA, Shaffer RD, Dahlgren LA, Guelcher SA, Goldstein AS. Effect of fiber diameter and alignment of electrospun polyurethane meshes on mesenchymal progenitor cells. Tissue Eng 2009;15A(9):2435-45.
7. Christopherson GT, Song H, Mao H-Q. The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation. Biomaterials 2009;30(4):556-64.
8. Chen M, Patra PK, Warner SB, Bhowmick S. Role of fiber diameter in adhesion and proliferation of NIH 3T3 fibroblast on electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2007;13:579.
9. Tian F, Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Khademhosseini A, Yokoyama Y, Estrada GG, et al. Quantitative analysis of cell adhesion on aligned micro-And nanofibers. J Biomed Mater Res 2008;84A:291-9.
10. Bashur CA, Dahlgren LA, Goldstein AS. Effect of fiber diameter and orientation on fibroblast morphology and proliferation on electrospun poly(D, L-lactic-coglycolic acid) meshes. Biomaterials 2006;27:5681-8. (Pubitemid 44279062)
11. Liu Y, Ji Y, Ghosh K, Clark RAF, Huang L, Rafailovich MH. Effects of fiber orientation and diameter on the behavior of human dermal fibroblasts on electrospun PMMA scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;90A:1092-106.
12. den Braber E, de Ruijter J, Ginsel L, VonRecum A, Jansen J. Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:291-300.
13. Badami A, Kreke M, Thompson M, Riffle J, Goldstein A. Effect of fiber diameter on spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblastic cells on electrospun poly(lactic acid) substrates. Biomaterials 2006;27:596-606. (Pubitemid 41464255)
14. Deeg J, Louban I, Aydin D, Selhuber-Unkel C, Kessler H, Spatz J. Impact of local versus global ligand density on cellular adhesion. Nano Lett 2011;11:1469-76.
15. Selhuber-Unkel C, Erdmann T, Lopez-Garcia M, Kessler H, Schwarz U, Spatz J. Cell adhesion strength is controlled by intermolecular spacing of adhesion receptors. Biophys J 2010;98:543-51.
16. Matthews JA, Wnek GE, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 2002;3:232.
17. Li D, Wang Y, Xia Y. Electrospinning of polymeric and ceramic nanofibers as uniaxially aligned arrays. Nano Lett 2003;3:1167.
18. Zhang J-F, Yang D-Z, Nie J. Effect of electric potential and coulombic interactions on electrospinning nanofiber distribution. Polym Int 2008;57:1194.
19. Yan H, Liu L, Zhang Z. Alignment of electrospun nanofibers using dielectric materials. Appl Phys Lett 2009;95(14):143114.
20. Kakade MV, Givens S, Gardner K, Lee KH, Chase DB, Rabolt JF. Electric field induced orientation of polymer chains in macroscopically aligned electrospun polymer nanofibers. J Am Chem Soc 2007;129(10):2777.
21. Yarin AL, Koombhongse S, Reneker DH. Bending instability in electrospinning of nanofibers. J Appl Phys 2001;89(5):3018.
22. Chaurey V, Chiang P-C, Polanco C, Su Y-H, Chou C-F, Swami NS. Interplay of electrical forces for alignment of sub-100 nm electrospun nanofibers on insulator gap collectors. Langmuir 2010;26(24):19022-6.
23. Moroni L, Lee L. Micropatterned hot-embossed polymeric surfaces influence cell proliferation and alignment. J Biomed Mater Res 2009;88A(3):644-53.
24. Yim EKF, Reanob RM, Pangb SW, Yeec AF, Chena CS, Leong K. Nanopatterninduced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2005;26:5405-13. (Pubitemid 40462355)
25. Crouch AS, Miller D, Luebke KJ, Hu W. Correlation of anisotropic cell behaviors with topographic aspect ratio. Biomaterials 2009;30:1560-7.
26. Deitzel J, Kosik W, McKnight S, Beck Tan N, DeSimone JM, Crette S. Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers with specific surface chemistry. Polymer 2002;43(3):1025-9. (Pubitemid 33108349)
27. Lee JH, Jung HW, Kang I-K, Lee HB. Cell behaviour on polymer surfaces with different functional groups. Biomaterials 1994;15(9):705-11. (Pubitemid 24230611)
28. Nikolovski J, Mooney D. Smooth muscle cell adhesion to tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 2000;21(20):2025-203.
29. Woo K, Chen V, Ma P. Nanofibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. J Biomed Mater Res 2003;67A:531-7. (Pubitemid 37522460)
30. Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Bertics PJ, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro and nanostructured substrates. J Cell Sci 2003;116:1881-92. (Pubitemid 36622287)