Dating and substance use in adolescent peer networks: A replication and extension

Addiction

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 638-647

  Kreager, Derek A ^a   Haynie, Dana L ^b   Hopfer, Suellen ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Dating; Peer networks; Substance use; Tobacco

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRIEND; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUALITY; SMOKING; SOCIAL SUPPORT; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; FEMALE; FRIENDS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; IOWA; MALE; PEER GROUP; PENNSYLVANIA; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SMOKING; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84873956800     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04095.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Johnston L. D., O'Malley P. M., Bachman J. G., Schulenberg J. E. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2009 Volume 1: Secondary School Students. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2010.
2. Johnston L. D., O'Malley P. M., Bachman J. G., Schulenberg J. E. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2009 Volume II: College Students & Adults 19-50. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2010.
3. Kreager D. A., Haynie D. L. Dangerous liaisons? Dating and drinking diffusion in adolescent peer networks. Am Sociol Rev 2011; 76: 737-763.
4. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties: network theory revisited. Sociol Theory 1983; 1: 201-233.
5. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 1973; 78: 1360-1380.
6. Alexander C., Piazza M., Mekos D., Valente T. Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. J Adolesc 2001; 29: 22-30.
7. Ennett S. T., Bauman K. E. Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. J Health Soc Behav 1993; 34: 226-236.
8. Ennett S. T., Bauman K. E., Hussong A., Faris R., Cai L. The peer context of adolescent substance use: findings from social network analysis. J Res Adolesc 2006; 16: 159-186.
9. Mayeux L., Sandstrom M. J., Cillessen A. H. Is being popular a risky proposition? J Res Adolesc 2008; 18: 49-74.
10. Tucker J. S., Edelen M. O., Go M., Pollard M. S., Green M. S., Kennedy D. P. Resisting smoking when a best friend smokes: do intrapersonal and contextual factors matter? J Res Adolesc 2011; 22: 113-122.
11. Fidler J. A., West R., Jarvis M. J., Wardle J. Early dating predicts smoking during adolescence: a prospective study. Addiction 2006; 101: 1805-1813.
12. Valente T. W., Unger J. B., Johnson C. A. Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. J Adolesc Health 2005; 37: 323-329.
13. Kiuru N., Burk W. J., Laursen B., Salmela-Aro K., Nurmi J. Pressure to drink but not to smoke: disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. J Adolesc 2010; 33: 801-812.
14. Mercken L., Snijders T. A. B., Steglich C., Vartiainen E., De Vries H. Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Soc Networks 2010; 32: 72-81.
15. Steglich C., Snijders T. A., Pearson M. Dynamic networks and behavior: separating selection from influence. Sociol Methodol 2010; 40: 329-393.
16. Aikens J. W., Simon V. A., Prinstein M. J. Romantic partner selection and socialization of young adolescents' substance use and behavior problems. J Adolesc 2010; 33: 813-826.
17. Spoth R., Redmond C., Shin C., Greenberg M., Clair S., Feinberg M. Substance use outcomes at 18 months past baseline from the PROSPER community-university partnership trial. Am J Prev Med 2007; 32: 395-402.
18. Carver K., Joyner K., Udry J. R. National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In: Florsheim P., editor. Adolescent Romantic Relations and Sexual Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practical Implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2003, p. 23-56.
19. Eligibility Manual for School Meals: Determining and verifying eligibility. US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2011.
20. Milot A. S., Ludden A. B. The effects of religion and gender on well-being, substance use, and academic engagement among rural adolescents. Youth Soc 2009; 40: 403-425.
21. Bonacich P. Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am J Sociol 1987; 92: 1170-1182.
22. Kenny D. A., Kashy D. A., Cook W. L. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
23. Gest S. D., Osgood D. W., Feinberg M., Bierman K. L., Moody J. Strengthening prevention program theories and evaluations: contributions from social network analysis. Prev Sci 2011; 12: 349-360.