Adaptive condition-based maintenance decision framework for deteriorating systems operating under variable environment and uncertain condition monitoring

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability

Volumn 226, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 602-623

  Huynh, Khac Tuan ^a   Barros, Anne ^a   Bérenguer, Christophe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE TROYES   (France)

^b GIPSA LAB   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptive maintenance decision; diagnostic covariate; environmental covariate; fatigue crack growth; indirect condition monitoring; maintenance cost model; particle filter

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION SCHEME; ADAPTIVE MAINTENANCE; CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE; COVARIATES; CRACK DEPTHS; DETERIORATING SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FINITE STATE SPACES; INFORMATION SOURCES; INSPECTION TIME; MAINTENANCE COST MODEL; MAINTENANCE DECISION MAKING; MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES; MONITORING INFORMATION; NON-DESTRUCTIVE ULTRASONIC TECHNIQUES; PARTICLE FILTER; PHYSICS-BASED; VARIABLE ENVIRONMENT;

CRACKS; DETERIORATION; FATIGUE CRACK PROPAGATION; MAINTENANCE; RANDOM PROCESSES; ULTRASONIC TESTING;

CONDITION MONITORING;

EID: 84873926347     PISSN: 1748006X     EISSN: 17480078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1748006X12465718     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley ; 2002 :
2. Wang W Complex system maintenance handbook. London: Springer ; 2008: 111-131.
3. Kharoufeh JP. Explicit results for wear processes in a markovian environment. Ops Res Letts. 2003 ; 31 (3). 237-244
4. Deloux E, Castanier B, Bérenguer C. Predictive maintenance policy for a gradually deteriorating system subject to stress. Rel Engng Sys Saf. 2009 ; 94 (2). 418-431
5. Zhao X, Fouladirad M, Bérenguer C, et al. Condition-based inspection/replacement policies for non-monotone deteriorating systems with environmental covariates. Rel Engng Sys Saf. 2010 ; 95 (8). 921-934
6. Huynh KT, Barros A, Bérenguer C, et al. A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events. Rel Engng Sys Saf. 2011 ; 96 (4). 497-508
7. Wang W. A prognosis model for wear prediction based on oil-based monitoring. J Opl Res Soc. 2006 ; 58 (7). 887-893
8. Xu Z, Ji Y, Zhou D. Real-time reliability prediction for a dynamic system based on the hidden degradation process identification. IEEE Trans Rel. 2008 ; 57 (2). 230-242
9. Cadini F, Zio E, Avram D. Model-based monte carlo state estimation for condition-based component replacement. Rel Engng Sys Saf. 2009 ; 94 (3). 752-758
10. Huynh KT, Barros A, Bérenguer C. Maintenance decision-making for systems operating under indirect condition monitoring: value of online information and impact of measurement uncertainty. IEEE Trans Rel. 2012 ; 61 (2). 410-425
11. Myötyri E, Pulkkinen U, Simola K. Application of stochastic filtering for lifetime prediction. Rel Engng Sys Saf. 2006 ; 91 (2). 200-208
12. Zio E, Peloni G. Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components. Rel Engng Sys Saf. 2011 ; 96 (3). 403-409
13. Yang Y, Klutke GA. Improved inspection schemes for deteriorating equipment. Probability Engng Info Sci. 2000 ; 14 (4). 445-460
14. Grall A, Dieulle L, Bérenguer C, et al. Continuous-time predictive-maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. IEEE Trans Rel. 2002 ; 51 (2). 141-150
15. Barker C, Newby M. Optimal non-periodic inspection for a multivariate degradation model. Rel Engng Sys Saf. 2009 ; 94 (1). 33-43
16. Ponchet A, Fouladirad M, Grall A. Assessment of a maintenance model for a multi-deteriorating mode system. Rel Engng Sys Saf. 2010 ; 95 (11). 1244-1254
17. Deloux E, Castanier B, Bérenguer C. Environmental information adaptive condition-based maintenance policies. Struct Infrastruct Engng. 2012 ; 8 (4). 373-382
18. Wang X Encyclopedia of statistics in quality and reliability. Ruggeri F Kenett R Faltin FW, ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons ; 2007: 1356-1361.
19. Kozin F, Bogdanoff JL. Probabilistic models of fatigue crack growth: results and speculations. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 1989 ; 115 (1). 143-171
20. Bigerelle M, Iost A. Bootstrap analysis of FCGR, application to the Paris relationship and to lifetime prediction. Int J Fatigue. 1999 ; 21 (4). 299-307
21. Whittaker IC and Saunders SC. Application of reliability analysis to aircraft structures subject to fatigue crack growth and periodic structural inspection. Techical Report AFML-TR-73-92, Air Force Material Laboratories, 1973.
22. Lin YK, Yang JN. On statistical moments of fatigue crack propagation. Engng Fract Mechanics. 1983 ; 18 (2). 243-256
23. Kozin F, Bogdanoff JL. A critical analysis of some probabilistic models of fatigue crack growth. Engng Fract Mechanics. 1981 ; 14 (1). 59-89
24. Yang JN, Manning SD. A simple second order approximation for stochastic crack growth analysis. Engng Fract Mechanics. 1996 ; 53 (5). 677-686
25. Xing J, Zhong OP, Hong YJ. A simple log normal random process approach of the fatigue crack growth considering the distribution of initial crack size and loading condition. Int J Pressure Vessels and Piping. 1997 ; 74 (1). 7-12
26. Wu W, Ni C. A study of stochastic fatigue crack growth modeling through experimental data. Probabilistic Engng Mechanics. 2003 ; 18 (2). 107-118
27. Wu WF, Ni CC. Probabilistic models of fatigue crack propagation and their experimental verification. Probabilistic Engng Mechanics. 2004 ; 19 (3). 247-257
28. Özekici S. Optimal maintenance policies in random environments. Eur J Opl Res. 1995 ; 82 (2). 283-294
29. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodol). 1972 ; 34 (2). 187-220
30. Simola K, Pulkkinen U. Models for non-destructive inspection data. Rel Engng Sys Saf. 1998 ; 60 (1). 1-12
31. van Noortwijk JM, van der Weide JAM. Applications to continuous-time processes of computational techniques for discrete-time renewal processes. Rel Engng Sys Saf. 2008 ; 93 (12). 1853-1860
32. Wagner HM Principles of operations research. 2 nd ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall ; 1975 :
33. Tijms HC A first course in stochastic models. New York: Wiley ; 2003 :
34. Mann L, Saxena A, Knapp GM. Statistical-based or condition-based preventive maintenance?. J Qual Maint Engng. 1995 ; 1 (1). 46-59
35. Orchard ME, Vachtsevanos GJ. A particle-filtering approach for on-line fault diagnosis and failure prognosis. Trans Inst Measurement Control. 2009 ; 31 (3-4). 221
36. Sun Y, Ma L, Mathew J, et al. Mechanical systems hazard estimation using condition monitoring. Mech Sys Signal Processing. 2006 ; 20 (5). 1189-1201
37. Baruah P, Chinnam RB. HMMs for diagnostics and prognostics in machining processes. Int J Prod Res. 2005 ; 43 (6). 1275-1293
38. Si XS, Wang W, Hu CH, et al. Remaining useful life estimation - a review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur J Opl Res. 2011 ; 213 (1). 1-14
39. Arulampalam MS, Maskell S, Gordon N, et al. A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Processing. 2002 ; 50 (2). 174-188
40. Doucet A, De Freitas N, Gordon N Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. New York: Springer Verlag ; 2001 :
41. Kitagawa G. Monte carlo filter and smoother for non-gaussian nonlinear state space models. J Computational Graphical Stats. 1996 ; 5 (1). 1-25
42. Belegundu AD, Chandrupatla TR Optimization concepts and applications in engineering. New York: Cambridge University Press ; 2011 :