-
2
-
-
0023915677
-
ERCP--the first twenty years
-
McCune WS. ERCP--the first twenty years. Gastrointest Endosc 1988; 34: 277-278
-
(1988)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.34
, pp. 277-278
-
-
McCune, W.S.1
-
3
-
-
78349298728
-
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
-
Baron TH. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 938-943
-
(2010)
Endoscopy
, vol.42
, pp. 938-943
-
-
Baron, T.H.1
-
4
-
-
34249803275
-
Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice
-
Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, Riley SA, Veitch P, Wilkinson M, Williamson PJ, Lombard M. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007; 56: 821-829
-
(2007)
Gut
, vol.56
, pp. 821-829
-
-
Williams, E.J.1
Taylor, S.2
Fairclough, P.3
Hamlyn, A.4
Logan, R.F.5
Martin, D.6
Riley, S.A.7
Veitch, P.8
Wilkinson, M.9
Williamson, P.J.10
Lombard, M.11
-
5
-
-
84873897092
-
-
Available from: URL
-
Endonurse: Developments in ERCP. Available from: URL: http: //www.endonurse.com/articles/2008/06/developments-in-ercp.aspx
-
Endonurse: Developments in ERCP
-
-
-
6
-
-
84866935983
-
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training in the United Kingdom: A critical review
-
Isaacs P. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training in the United Kingdom: A critical review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 3: 30-33
-
(2011)
World J Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.3
, pp. 30-33
-
-
Isaacs, P.1
-
7
-
-
62949158205
-
The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: A systematic review
-
Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS, Shaheen NJ. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 843-849
-
(2009)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.69
, pp. 843-849
-
-
Dellon, E.S.1
Hawk, J.S.2
Grimm, I.S.3
Shaheen, N.J.4
-
8
-
-
33847699746
-
Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial
-
Bretthauer M, Seip B, Aasen S, Kordal M, Hoff G, Aabakken L. Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 58-64
-
(2007)
Endoscopy
, vol.39
, pp. 58-64
-
-
Bretthauer, M.1
Seip, B.2
Aasen, S.3
Kordal, M.4
Hoff, G.5
Aabakken, L.6
-
9
-
-
77953912869
-
A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of air insufflation versus carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP
-
Dellon ES, Velayudham A, Clarke BW, Isaacs KL, Gangarosa LM, Galanko JA, Grimm IS. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of air insufflation versus carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 68-77
-
(2010)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.72
, pp. 68-77
-
-
Dellon, E.S.1
Velayudham, A.2
Clarke, B.W.3
Isaacs, K.L.4
Gangarosa, L.M.5
Galanko, J.A.6
Grimm, I.S.7
-
10
-
-
81955168081
-
Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography reduces bowel gas volume but does not affect visual analogue scale scores of suffering: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
-
Kuwatani M, Kawakami H, Hayashi T, Ishiwatari H, Kudo T, Yamato H, Ehira N, Haba S, Eto K, Kato M, Asaka M. Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography reduces bowel gas volume but does not affect visual analogue scale scores of suffering: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3784-3790
-
(2011)
Surg Endosc
, vol.25
, pp. 3784-3790
-
-
Kuwatani, M.1
Kawakami, H.2
Hayashi, T.3
Ishiwatari, H.4
Kudo, T.5
Yamato, H.6
Ehira, N.7
Haba, S.8
Eto, K.9
Kato, M.10
Asaka, M.11
-
11
-
-
82955199939
-
Carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under general anesthesia
-
Luigiano C, Ferrara F, Pellicano R, Fabbri C, Cennamo V, Bassi M, Ghersi S, Billi P, Polifemo A, Festa C, Cerchiari E, Morace C, Consolo P, Alibrandi A, D'Imperio N. Carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under general anesthesia. Minerva Med 2011; 102: 261-269
-
(2011)
Minerva Med
, vol.102
, pp. 261-269
-
-
Luigiano, C.1
Ferrara, F.2
Pellicano, R.3
Fabbri, C.4
Cennamo, V.5
Bassi, M.6
Ghersi, S.7
Billi, P.8
Polifemo, A.9
Festa, C.10
Cerchiari, E.11
Morace, C.12
Consolo, P.13
Alibrandi, A.14
D'Imperio, N.15
-
12
-
-
67651119944
-
Carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP for reduction of postprocedure pain: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
-
Maple JT, Keswani RN, Hovis RM, Saddedin EZ, Jonnalagadda S, Azar RR, Hagen C, Thompson DM, Waldbaum L, Edmundowicz SA. Carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP for reduction of postprocedure pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 278-283
-
(2009)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.70
, pp. 278-283
-
-
Maple, J.T.1
Keswani, R.N.2
Hovis, R.M.3
Saddedin, E.Z.4
Jonnalagadda, S.5
Azar, R.R.6
Hagen, C.7
Thompson, D.M.8
Waldbaum, L.9
Edmundowicz, S.A.10
-
13
-
-
84899038962
-
A prospective double blind randomised controlled trial of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation during ERCP: Is it worth the pain?
-
Mei SLCY, Ashby A, George B, Tarn W, Singh R. A prospective double blind randomised controlled trial of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation during ERCP: Is it worth the pain? Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: Suppl 1: AB351
-
(2011)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.73
, Issue.SUPPL. 1
-
-
Mei, S.L.C.Y.1
Ashby, A.2
George, B.3
Tarn, W.4
Singh, R.5
-
14
-
-
84899043586
-
Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial showing carbon dioxide is superior to air insufflation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography
-
Arjunan S, Darishetty S, Tandan M, Lakhtakia S, Gupta R, Ramchandani M, Monga A, Wee E, Reddy DN. Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial showing carbon dioxide is superior to air insufflation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: Suppl 5: 2
-
(2011)
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
, vol.26
, Issue.SUPPL. 5
, pp. 2
-
-
Arjunan, S.1
Darishetty, S.2
Tandan, M.3
Lakhtakia, S.4
Gupta, R.5
Ramchandani, M.6
Monga, A.7
Wee, E.8
Reddy, D.N.9
-
15
-
-
65549143106
-
Carbon dioxide for gut distension during digestive endoscopy: Technique and practice survey
-
Janssens F, Deviere J, Eisendrath P, Dumonceau JM. Carbon dioxide for gut distension during digestive endoscopy: technique and practice survey. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1475-1479
-
(2009)
World J Gastroenterol
, vol.15
, pp. 1475-1479
-
-
Janssens, F.1
Deviere, J.2
Eisendrath, P.3
Dumonceau, J.M.4
-
16
-
-
78649517062
-
Turning science into clinical practice-the case of carbon dioxide insufflation
-
Bretthauer M. Turning science into clinical practice-the case of carbon dioxide insufflation. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 1104-1105
-
(2010)
Endoscopy
, vol.42
, pp. 1104-1105
-
-
Bretthauer, M.1
-
17
-
-
84907419121
-
Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
-
Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (2): CD006930
-
(2009)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, Issue.2
-
-
Gurusamy, K.S.1
Samraj, K.2
Davidson, B.R.3
-
18
-
-
70049099036
-
Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies
-
(editors). In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from: URL
-
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Available from: URL: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
-
(2011)
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
-
-
Higgins, J.P.T.1
Altman, D.G.2
Sterne, J.A.C.3
-
19
-
-
84890783342
-
Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses
-
(editors). In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from: URL
-
Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Available from: URL: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
-
(2011)
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
-
-
Deeks, J.J.1
Higgins, J.P.T.2
Altman, D.G.3
-
20
-
-
84890730197
-
Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases
-
(editors). In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). TVersion 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from: URL
-
Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D (editors). Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Available from: URL: http:// www. cochrane-handbook.org
-
(2011)
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
-
-
Sterne, J.A.C.1
Egger, M.2
Moher, D.3
-
21
-
-
0026492539
-
Intention-to-treat analysis: Implications for quantitative and qualitative research
-
Newell DJ. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. Int J Epidemiol 1992; 21: 837-841
-
(1992)
Int J Epidemiol
, vol.21
, pp. 837-841
-
-
Newell, D.J.1
-
22
-
-
80052307183
-
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]
-
(editors). Available from: URL
-
Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Available from: URL: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
-
(2011)
The Cochrane Collaboration
-
-
Higgins, J.P.T.1
Green, S.2
-
23
-
-
69449100622
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviewsand meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
-
PRISMA Group
-
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviewsand meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535
-
(2009)
BMJ
, vol.339
-
-
Moher, D.1
Liberati, A.2
Tetzlaff, J.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
24
-
-
79957858078
-
Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for decreasing post-ERCP pain: A randomized, sham-controlled, pilot study
-
Borckardt JJ, Romagnuolo J, Reeves ST, Madan A, Frohman H, Beam W, George MS. Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for decreasing post-ERCP pain: a randomized, sham-controlled, pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1158-1164
-
(2011)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.73
, pp. 1158-1164
-
-
Borckardt, J.J.1
Romagnuolo, J.2
Reeves, S.T.3
Madan, A.4
Frohman, H.5
Beam, W.6
George, M.S.7
-
25
-
-
77957585557
-
Cardiac and cerebral air embolism from endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography
-
Finsterer J, Stöllberger C, Bastovansky A. Cardiac and cerebral air embolism from endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 22: 1157-1162
-
(2010)
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
, vol.22
, pp. 1157-1162
-
-
Finsterer, J.1
Stöllberger, C.2
Bastovansky, A.3
-
26
-
-
79952112928
-
Carbon dioxide-enhanced virtual MDCT cholangiopancreatography
-
Sugimoto M, Yasuda H, Koda K, Suzuki M, Yamazaki M, Tezuka T, Kosugi C, Higuchi R, Watayo Y, Yagawa Y, Uemura S, Tsuchiya H, Azuma T. Carbon dioxide-enhanced virtual MDCT cholangiopancreatography. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2010; 17: 601-610
-
(2010)
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
, vol.17
, pp. 601-610
-
-
Sugimoto, M.1
Yasuda, H.2
Koda, K.3
Suzuki, M.4
Yamazaki, M.5
Tezuka, T.6
Kosugi, C.7
Higuchi, R.8
Watayo, Y.9
Yagawa, Y.10
Uemura, S.11
Tsuchiya, H.12
Azuma, T.13
-
27
-
-
77950189829
-
CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
-
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c332
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.340
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Altman, D.G.2
Moher, D.3
|