Latent science collaboration: Strategies of bioethical capacity building in Mainland China's stem cell world

BioSocieties

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 7-24

  Sleeboom Faulkner, Margaret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

China; Flexible bioethics; Ioethical capacity building; Latent collaboration; Stem cell research regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873909957     PISSN: 17458552     EISSN: 17458560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/biosoc.2012.32     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bhutta, Z.A. (2002) Ethics in International Health Research: A Perspective from the DevelopingWorld. CMH Working Paper Series, Paper No. WG2: 4, http://www.cmhealth.org/docs/wg2-paper4.pdf, last accessed 19 November 2012.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1969) Intellectual field and creative project. Social Science Information 89(2): 89-119.
3. Cell News. (2005) China seeks extended collaboration with EU on stem cell research. Cell News, 26 January, http://www.geocities.com/giantfideli/link/ CellNEWS-articles.html.
4. Doring, O. (2003) Chinese researchers promote biomedical regulations: What are the motives of the biopolitical dawn in China and where are they heading? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14(1): 39-46.
5. Do? ring, O. and Chen, R. (eds.) (2002) Advances in Chinese Medical Ethics: Chinese and International Perspectives. Hamburg, Germany: Mitteilungen des Institutes fu? r Asienkunde, p. 355.
6. Gla? nzel, W. (2001) National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 51(1): 69-115.
7. Hassan, M.H.A. (2007) Building capacity in the life sciences in the developing world. Cell 131(3): 433-436.
8. Hong, W. (2008) Decline of the center: The decentralizing process of knowledge transfer of Chinese universities from 1985 to 2004. Research Policy 37(4): 580-595.
9. HUGO Ethics Committee. (2000) Opinion: Hugo Ethics Committee statement on benefit sharing. Clinical Genetics 58(5): 364-366.
10. Ministry of Science and Technology and Ministry of Health. (2003) Ethical Guiding Principles on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research of the PRC. http://www.chinaphs.org/bioethics/regulations-&-laws.htm#-Toc113106142, last accessed 19 November 2012.
11. Petryna, A. (2006) Globalizing human subjects research. In: A. Petryna, A. Lakoff and A. Kleinman (eds.) Global Pharmaceuticals, Ethics, Markets, Practice. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, pp. 1-32.
12. Petryna, A. (2009) When Experiments Travel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Qiu, R. (ed.) (2006) Bioethics: Asian Perspectives: A Quest for Moral Diversity. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
14. Rahman, A. (1983) Intellectual Colonization: Science and Technology in West-East Relations. New Delhi, India: Vikas Publishing House.
15. Schrecker, T. (2003) Benefit-sharing in the new genomic marketplace: Expanding the ethical frame of reference. In: B. Knoppers (ed.) Populations and Genetics: Legal and Socio-ethical Perspectives. Leiden, The Netherlands: Marinus Nijhoff, pp. 405-411.
16. Simpson, B., Dissanayake, V., Douglas-Jones, R. and Sariola, S. (2009) Ethical review, remit and responsibility in biomedical research in South Asia. The IIAS Newletter, No 52, November 2009, p. 17.
17. Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. (2004) Academic Nations in China and Japan: Framed by Concepts of Nature, Culture and the Universal. London and New York: Routledge/Curzon, Nissan Series, Oxford, pp. 1-220.
18. Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. (2008) The changing nature of ideology in the life sciences in the People's Republic of China (PRC): Case studies of human cloning and human embryonic stem cell research (hESR) in medical textbooks (1996-2005). BioSocieties 3(1): 21-36.
19. Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. (2010) Boundary-making between science, society and the world: The case of Stem Cell Research in China. East Asia Journal for Science and Technology Studies 4(1): 31-51.
20. Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. and Patra, P. (2008) The bioethical vacuum: National policies on human embryonic stem cell research in India and China. Journal of International Biotechnology Law 5(6): 21-36.
21. Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. and Patra, P. (2011) Experimental stem cell therapy: Biohierarchies and bionetworking in Japan and India. Social Studies of Science 41(5): 696-707.
22. Sunder Rajan, K. (2007) Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
23. Wagner, C. and Leydesdorff, L. (2005) Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy 34(10): 1608-1618.
24. Zhang, J.Y. (2012) The Cosmopolitanization of Science: Stem cell Governance in China. Basingstoke, UK and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.