Networks and Kinship: Formal Models of Alliance, Descent, and Inheritance in a Pakistani Punjabi Village

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 45-55

  Lyon, Stephen M ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

formal models; genealogy; inheritance; kinship theory; social change; social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873876112     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: 15528286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439312453275     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BorgattiS. (1998). Social network analysis instructional web site, Vol. 2010. Retrieved September 10, 2012, fromhttp://www.analytictech.com/networks.
2. Borgatti S. P.,Mehra A.,Brass D. J.,Labianca G.Network analysis in the social sciences.Science. 2009;323:892-895.
3. Carsten J.The heat of the hearth: The process of kinship in a Malay fishing community. Oxford studies in social and cultural anthropology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1997:.
4. FischerM. D. (1999). Representing anthropological knowledge: Calculating kinship; Analyzing and understanding cultural codes. Canterbury, UK: Centre for Social Anthropology and Computing. Accessed July 1, 2012, http://era.anthropology.ac.uk.
5. Fischer M. D.When history accelerates: Essays on rapid social change, complexity, and creativity. Hann C., ed. London, England: Athlone Press; 1994:.
6. Fischer M. D.,Read D.Kinship Algebra Expert System: A computer program and documentation for formal modelling of kinship terminologies and the simulation of populations that under these models. (Vol. 2010). Canterbury, New Zealand: CSAC Monographs; 2005:.
7. Goody JProduction and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1976:.
8. Houseman M.,White D. R.Transformations of kinship. Godelier M.Trautmann T.Fat F. T. S., ed. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1998a:214-243.
9. Houseman M.,White D. R.Kinship, networks and exchange. Schweizer T.White D. R., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1998b:58-88.
10. Leach E.Pul Eliya: A village in Ceylon. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1961:.
11. Lyon S. M.Modeling Context in Punjabi Conflict Resolution: Social Organizations as Context Agents.Cybernetics and Systems. 2004;35:193-210.
12. Lyon S. M.,Magliveras S. S.Kinship, computing and anthropology.Social Science Computer Review. 2006;24:30-42.
13. Nooy W. D.,Mrvar A.,Batagelj V.Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 2005:.
14. Read D.The cultural analysis of kinship: The legacy of David Schneider and its implications for anthropological relativism. Feinberg R.Ottenheimer M., ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 2001a:78-117.
15. Read D. W.Formal analysis of kinship terminologies and its relationship to what constitutes kinship.Anthropological Theory. 2001b;1:239-267.
16. Read D. W.Kinship Algebra Expert System (KAES): A software implementation of a cultural theory.Social Science Computer Review. 2006;24:43-67.
17. Read D. W.,Behrens C. A.KAES: An expert system for the algebraic analysis of kinship terminologies.Journal of Quantitative Anthropology. 1990;2:353-393.
18. White D.,Johansen U.Network analysis and ethnographic problems. Lexington, VA: Lexington Books; 2004:.
19. White D. R.,Batagelj V.,Mrvar A.Analyzing large kinship and marriage networks with Pgraph and Pajek.Social Science Computer Review. 1999;17:245-274.