Discourse and practice: Using the power of well being

Evidence and Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 213-226

  Griggs, Steven ^a   Howarth, David ^b  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discourse; Logics of critical explanation; Practice; Well Being Power

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873842808     PISSN: 17442648     EISSN: 17442656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1332/174426411X579234     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bueger, C. (2009) 'Praxeology - why practice turn(s)?', http://practice-theory.net/?page-id=92
2. Connell, J.P., Kubisch, A.C., Schorr, L.B. and Weiss, C.H. (eds) (1995) New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Volume 1 - concepts, methods and context, Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
3. Connolly, W.E. (2008) Capitalism and Christianity, American style, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4. DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government) (2006) Formative evaluation of the take-up and implementation of the Well Being Power: Annual report 2006, INLOGOV, University of Birmingham and Cities Research Centre, University of the West of England, London: DCLG.
5. DCLG (2007) Formative evaluation of the take-up and implementation of the Well Being Power, 2003-2007: Final report 2007, INLOGOV, University of Birmingham and Cities Research Centre, University of the West of England, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
6. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Flyvbjerg, B. (2004) 'Phronetic planning research: theoretical and methodological reflections', Planning Theory and Practice, 5 (3): 283-306.
8. Foucault, M. (1984a) 'Nietzsche, genealogy, history', in P. Rabinow (ed) The Foucault reader, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
9. Foucault, M. (1984b) 'What is Enlightenment?', in P. Rabinow (ed) The Foucault reader, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
10. Foucault, M. (1985) The use of pleasure, New York, NY: Pantheon.
11. Geertz, C. (1973) The interpretation of cultures, New York, NY: Basic Books.
12. Glynos, J. and Howarth, D. (2007) Logics of critical explanation in political and social theory, London: Routledge.
13. Gottweis, H. (2003) 'Theoretical strategies of poststructuralist policy analysis: towards an analytics of government', in M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Hanson, N.R. (1961) Patterns of discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Howarth, D. (2000) Discourse, Buckingham: Open University Press.
16. Howarth, D. (2009) 'Discourse, power, and policy: articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies', Critical Policy Studies, 3 (3/4): 309-35.
17. Howarth, D. and Griggs, S. (2012: forthcoming) 'Poststructuralist policy analysis: discourse, hegemony, and critical explanation', in F. Fischer and H. Gottweis (eds) The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
18. Howarth, D., and Stavrakakis, Y. (2000) 'Introducing discourse theory and political analysis', in D. Howarth, A.J. Norval and Y. Stavrakakis (eds) Discourse theory and political analysis, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
19. Kitchin, H. (2003) Promoting well being: Making use of the council's new freedom, Birmingham: INLOGOV, University of Birmingham.
20. Laclau, E. (2005) On populist reason, London: Verso.
21. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics, London: Verso.
22. Law, J. (2006) Making a mess with method, 19 January version, www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2006MakingaMesswithMethod.pdf
23. Law, J. (2007) Actor network theory and material semiotics, 25 April version, www. heterogeneities.et/publications/Law2007ANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdf
24. Marx, K. (1973) Grundrisse, London: Allen Lane.
25. Mol, A. (2002) The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26. Mol, A. (2008) The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice, London: Routledge.
27. Oswick, C., Keenoy, T., Beverungen, A., Ellis, N., Sabelis, I. and Ybema, S. (2007) 'Discourse, practice, policy and organizing: some opening comments', International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27 (11/12): 429-32.
28. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic evaluation, London: Sage Publications.
29. Peirce, C.S. (1957) Essays in the philosophy of science, New York, NY: Liberal Arts Press.
30. Staten, H. (1984) Wittgenstein and Derrida, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
31. Thrift, N. (2000) 'It's the little things', in K. Dodds and D. Atkinson (eds) Geopolitical traditions: A century of geopolitical thought, London: Routledge.
32. Tilley, N. (2000) Realistic evaluation: An overview, Address to the Founding Conference of the Danish Evaluation Society, September, http://evidence-basedmanagement.com/research-practice/articles/nick-tilley.pdf
33. Torfing, J. (2005) 'Discourse theory: achievements, arguments, and challenges', in D. Howarth and J. Torfing (eds) Discourse theory in European politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Wagenaar, H. and Cook, S.D.N. (2003) 'Understanding policy practices: action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis', in M.A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Walters, W. (2002) 'The power of inscription: beyond social construction and deconstruction in European integration studies', Millennium, 31 (1): 83-108.