More Network Conscious Than Ever? Challenges, Strategies, and Analytic Labor of Users in the Facebook Environment

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 61-79

  Karakayali, Nedim ^a   Kilic, Aysenur ^a  

^a BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Facebook; Self Presentation; Social Network Sites; Social Networks; Surveillance; Users

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

FACEBOOK; IN-DEPTH UNDERSTANDING; SELF PRESENTATIONS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL NETWORK SITES; SOCIAL TIES; SURVEILLANCE; USER;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84873839863     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Proceedings of Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET) Springer, 36-58.
2. Adorno, T. W. (1981). Cultural criticism and society. T.W. Adorno, Prisms (pp. 17-34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London: Sage.
4. Berger, P. (1963). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. New York: Anchor Books.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-58). New York: Greenwood Press.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1990). other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.
8. boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. Z. Papacharissi (Ed.) A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39-58) New York: Routledge.
9. boyd, d., & Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: who cares? First Monday, 15(8), Retrieved February 20, 2011, from http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3086/2589.
10. Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A.-K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 83-108.
11. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Donath, J., & boyd, d. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.
13. Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415-441.
14. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
15. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon.
16. Garfinkel, H. (1984). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
17. Goffman, E. (1951). Symbols of class status. The British Journal of Sociology, 2(4), 294-304.
18. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
19. Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Proceedings of WPES'05. ACM, Alexandria, VA, 71-80.
20. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2002). The not so global village of Netville. B. Wellman, & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 345-371). Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City and Community, 2(3), 277-311.
22. Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication, & Society, 8(2), 125-147.
23. Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 30, 377-386.
24. Karakayali, N. (2005). Duality and diversity in the lives of immigrant children: Rethinking the 'problem of second generation' in light of immigrant autobiographies. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 42 (3), 325-344.
25. Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
26. Lampinen, A., Tamminen, S., & Oulasvirta, A. (2009). 'All my people right here, right now': Management of group co-presence on a social networking site. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, Florida, 281-290.
27. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Lewis, J., & West, A. (2009). 'Friending': London-based undergraduates' experience of Facebook. New Media and Society, 11, 1209-1229.
29. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A. & Christakis N. (2008a). Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30, 330-342.
30. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J. & Christakis, N. (2008b). The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 79-100.
31. Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media and Society, 10(3), 393-411.
32. Mayer, A. & Puller, S.L. (2008). The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 329-347.
33. McLean, P. D. (2007). The art of the network: Strategic interaction and patronage in Renaissance Florence. Durham: Duke University Press.
34. McLean, C. A. & Campbell, C. M. (2010). Locating research informants in a multiethnic community: Ethnic identities, social networks and recruitment methods. Ethnicity & Health, 8(1), 41-61.
35. Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12(4), 441-444.
36. Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.). (2010). A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge.
37. Raynes-Goldie, K. (2010). Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday, 15(1), Retrieved September 25, 2010, from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2775/2432.
38. Schutz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations: Selected writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Simmel, G. (1971). Sociability. Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms (pp. 127-140). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Spencer, L., & Pahl, R. E. (2006). Rethinking friendship: Hidden solidarities today. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41. Stutzman, F., & Kramer-Duffield, J. (2010). Friends only: Examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in Facebook. Proceedings of the 28th international Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 1553-1562.
42. Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13, 531-549.
43. Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology, Society, 28(1), 20-36.
44. Turkle, S. (1997). Multiple subjectivity and virtual community at the end of the Freudian century. Sociological Inquiry, 67(1), 72-84.
45. Utz, S. (2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15, 314-335.
46. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
47. Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
48. Wellman, B. & Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). The Internet in everyday life. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. West, A., Lewis, J., & Currie, P. (2009). Students' Facebook 'friends': Public and private spheres. Journal of Youth Studies, 12 (6), 615-627.
50. Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. (2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1-34.