The importance of using sustainable use protected areas for functional connectivity

Biological Conservation

Volumn 159, Issue , 2013, Pages 450-457

  Crouzeilles, Renato ^a   Lorini, Maria Lucia ^a   Grelle, Carlos Eduardo Viveiros ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Brazilian Atlantic Forest; Integral Index of Connectivity; Morphological spatial pattern analysis; Protected areas; Spatial graphs

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; GEOMORPHOLOGY; GRAPHICAL METHOD; INDEX METHOD; MOVEMENT; PATCH SIZE; PRIORITIZATION; PROTECTED AREA; RESERVE DESIGN; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ATLANTIC FOREST; BRAZIL;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84873824958     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.023     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baranyi G., Saura S., Podani J., Jordán F. Contribution of habitat patches to network connectivity: redundancy and uniqueness of topological indices. Ecological Indicators 2011, 11:1301-1310.
2. Bodin ö., Saura S. Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments. Ecological Modelling 2010, 221:2393-2405.
3. Brasil Lei Federal No. 9985, de 18 de julho de 2000. Diário Oficial da União 2000, 1:45-48.
4. Crouzeilles R., Lorini M.L., Grelle C.E.V. Deslocamento na matriz para espécies da mata Atlântica e a dificuldade da construção de perfis ecológicos. Oecologia Australis 2010, 14:875-903.
5. Crouzeilles R., Lorini M.L., Grelle C.E.V. Applying graph theory to design networks of protected areas: using inter-patch distance for regional conservation planning. Natureza & Conservação 2011, 9:219-224.
6. ESRI, 2008. ArcView 9.3. Redlands, California, USA.
7. Ferrari J.R., Lookingbill T.R., Neel M.C. Two measures of landscape-graph connectivity: assessment across gradients in area and configuration. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:1315-1323.
8. Fidalgo E.C.C., Uzêda M.C., Bergallo H.G., Costa T.C.C., Abreu M.B. Distribuição dos remanescentes vegetais no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Estratégias e ações para a conservação da biodiversidade no Estado do Rio de Janeiro 2009, 91-99. Instituto Biomas, Rio de Janeiro. H.B. Bergallo, E.C.C. Fidalgo, C.F.D. Rocha, M.C. Uzêda, M.B. Costa, M.A. Alves, M. Van Sluys, M.A. Santos, T.C.C. Costa, A.C.R. Cozzolino (Eds.).
9. Galpern P., Manseau M., Fall A. Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: a guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biological Conservation 2011, 144:44-55.
10. Grelle C.E.V., Alves M.A.S., Bergallo H.G., Geise L., Rocha C.F.D., Van Sluys M., Caramaschi U. Prediction of threatened tetrapods based on the species-area relationship in Atlantic forest. Journal of Zoology 2005, 265:359-364.
11. Jenkins C.N., Alves M.A.S., Pimm S.L. Avian conservation priorities in a top-ranked biodiversity hotspot. Biological Conservation 2010, 143:992-998.
12. Laurance W.F., et al. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology 2002, 16:605-618.
13. Laurance W.F. Conserving the hottest of the hotspots. Biological Conservation 2009, 142:1137.
14. Lindenmayer D.B., et al. A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecology Letters 2008, 11:78-91.
15. Lindenmayer D.B., Franklin J.F., Fischer F. General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 2006, 131:433-445.
16. Locke H., Dearden P. Rethinking protected areas categories and the new paradigm. Environmental Conservation 2005, 32:1-10.
17. Metzger J.P., Martensen A.C., Dixo M., Bernacci L.C., Ribeiro M.C., Teixeira A.M.G., Pardini R. Time-lag in the responses to landscape changes in highly dynamic Atlantic Forest region (SE Brazil). Biological Conservation 2009, 142:1166-1177.
18. Mittermeier R.A., Fonseca G.A.B., Rylands A.B., Brandon K. A brief history of biodiversity conservation in Brazil. Conservation Biology 2005, 19:601-607.
19. Ostapowicz K., Vogt P., Riitters K.H., Kozak J., Estreguil C. Impact of scale on morphological spatial pattern of forest. Landscape Ecology 2008, 23:1107-1117.
20. Pascual-Hortal L., Saura S. Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landscape Ecology 2006, 21:959-967.
21. Ribeiro M.C., Metzger J.P., Martensen A.C., Ponzoni F.J., Hirota M.M. Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 2009, 142:1141-1153.
22. Riitters K.H., Vogt P., Soille P., Kozak J., Estreguil C. Neutral model analysis of landscape patterns from mathematical morphology. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:1033-1043.
23. Rylands A.B., Brandon K. Brazilian protected areas. Conservation Biology 2005, 19:612-618.
24. Sarkar S., Illoldi-Rangel P. Systematic conservation planning: an updated protocol. Natureza & Conservação 2010, 8:19-26.
25. Saura S., Estreguil C., Mouton C., Rodríguez-Freire M. Network analysis to assess landscape connectivity trends: application to European forests (1990-2000). Ecological Indicators 2011, 11:407-416.
26. Saura S., Pascual-Hortal L. A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 83:91-103.
27. Saura S., Rubio L. A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape. Ecography 2010, 33:523-537.
28. Saura S., Torné J. Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environmental Modelling and Software 2009, 24:135-139.
29. Silva M. The Brazilian protected areas program. Conservation Biology 2005, 19:608-611.
30. Soille P., Vogt P. Morphological segmentation of binary patterns. Pattern Recognition Letters 2009, 30:456-459.
31. Mata Atlântica S.O.S., INPE Atlas dos remanescentes florestais da Mata Atlântica - Período de 2008-2010 - Dados parciais dos estados avaliados até maio de 2010 2010, Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica, São Paulo.
32. Taylor P.D., Fahrig L., Kringen H., Merriam G. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 1993, 68:571-573.
33. Tischendorf L., Fahrig L. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 2000, 90:7-19.
34. Urban D.L., Minor E.S., Treml E.A., Schick R.S. Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecology Letters 2009, 12:260-273.
35. Urban D.L., Keitt T.H. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 2001, 82:1205-1218.
36. Vieira M.V., Olifiers N., Delciellos A.C., Antunes V.Z., Bernardo L.R., Grelle C.E.V., Cerqueira R. Land use vs. fragment size and isolation as determinants of small mammal composition and richness in Atlantic Forest remnants. Biological Conservation 2009, 142:1191-1200.
37. Vogt P., Ferrari J.R., Lookingbill T.R., Gardner R.H., Riitters K.H., Ostapowicz K. Mapping functional connectivity. Ecological Indicators 2009, 9:64-71.
38. Vogt P., Riitters K.H., Estreguil C., Kozak J., Wade T.G., Wickham J.D. Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:171-177.
39. Vold, T., Buffett, D.A., 2008. In: Volt, T., Buffett, D.A. (Eds.), Ecological Concepts, Principles and Applications to conservation, Biodiversity, BC, pp. 36.