Pitfalls in the Use of Time Series Methods to Study Deterrence and Capital Punishment

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 45-66

  Charles, Kerwin Kofi ^a   Durlauf, Steven N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Brutalization; Capital punishment; Decision theory; Deterrence; Identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873748042     PISSN: 07484518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10940-012-9169-7     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Angrist J, Kuersteiner G (2011) Causal effects of monetary policy shocks: semiparametric conditional independence tests with multinomial propensity score. Rev Econ Stat 93(3): 725-747.
2. Arendt H (1977) Eichmann in Jerusalem. New York: Penguin Books. (Revision of 1963 1st edn).
3. Ash R, Gardner M (1975) Topics in stochastic processes. Academic Press, Orlando.
4. Bailey W (1998) Deterrence, brutalization and the death penalty: another reexamination of Oklahoma's return to capital punishment. Criminology 36: 711-733.
5. Becker G (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic analysis. J Polit Econ 78: 169-217.
6. Becsi Z (1999) Economics and crime in the states. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Econ Rev Q1: 38-49.
7. Blumstein A, Cohen J, Nagin D (1978) Deterrence an incapacitation: estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates, report of the panel on deterrence and incapacitation, National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
8. Cloninger D (1992) Capital punishment and deterrence: a portfolio approach. Appl Econ 24: 645-655.
9. Cloninger D, Marchesini R (2001) Execution and deterrence: a quasi-controlled group experiment. Appl Econ 33: 569-576.
10. Cloninger D, Marchesini R (2006) Execution moratoriums, commutations, and deterrence: the case of Illinois. Appl Econ 38: 967-973.
11. Cochran J, Chamblin M, Seth M (1994) Deterrence or brutalization? an impact assessment of Oklahoma's return to capital punishment. Criminology 32: 107-134.
12. Dezhbakhsh H, Rubin P, Shepherd J (2003) Does capital punishment have a deterrent effect? new evidence from postmoratorium panel data. Am Law Econ Rev 5: 344-376.
13. Donohue J, Wolfers J (2005) Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. Stanf Law Rev 58: 791-846.
14. Durlauf S, Nagin D (2010) The deterrent effect of imprisonment. In: Cook P, Ludwig J, McCrary J (eds) Controlling crime: strategies and payoffs. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (forthcoming).
15. Durlauf S, Johnson P, Temple J (2006) Growth econometrics. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: North Holland.
16. Durlauf S, Kourtellos A, Tan CM (2008) Are any growth theories robust?. Econ J 118: 329-346.
17. Durlauf S, Navarro S, Rivers D (2010) Understanding aggregate crime regressions. J Econ 158: 306-317.
18. Ehrlich I (1975a) The deterrent effect of capital punishment: a question of life and death. Am Econ Rev 65: 397-417.
19. Ehrlich I (1975b) Deterrence, evidence, and inference. Yale Law J 85: 2209-2227.
20. Granger C (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424-438.
21. Grogger J (1990) The deterrent effect of capital punishment: an analysis of daily homicide counts. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 295-303.
22. Hamilton J (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
23. Hjalmarsson R (2009) Does capital punishment have a "local" deterrent effect on homicides? Am Law Econ Rev 11: 310-324.
24. Kessler D, Levitt S (1999) Using sentence enhancements to distinguish between deterrence and incapacitation. J Law Econ 42: 343-363.
25. Land K, Teske R, Zheng H (2009) The short run effects of executions on homicides: deterrence, displacement or both? Criminology 47: 501-536.
26. Leamer E (1985) Vector autoregressions for causal inference? Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 22: 255-303.
27. Lee D, McCrary J (2009) The deterrent effect of prison: dynamic theory and evidence. Department of Economics, Princeton University (unpublished manuscript).
28. Leeper E, Zha T (2003) Modest policy interventions. J Monet Econ 50: 1673-1700.
29. Leeper E, Sims C, Zha T (1996) What does monetary policy do? (with discussion). Brookings Pap Econ Act 2: 1-78.
30. Leeper E, Walker T, Yang S-C (2008) Fiscal foresight: analytics and econometrics. NBER Working Paper no. 2008.
31. Liebman J, Fagan J, West V (2000) Capital attrition: error rates in capital cases, 1973-1995. Texas Law Rev 78: 1839-1861.
32. Lucas R (1976) Econometric policy evaluation: a critique. Carnegie-Rochester Ser Public Policy 1: 19-46.
33. Marvell T, Moody C (1994) Prison population growth and crime reduction. J Quant Criminol 10: 109-140.
34. Phillips D (1980) The deterrent effect of capital punishment: new evidence on an old controversy. Am J Sociol 86: 139-148.
35. Phillips D (1982) Deterrence and the death penalty: reply to Zeisel. Am J Sociol 88: 170-172.
36. Roberts S (2001) The brother. Random House, New York.
37. Sargent T (1987) Macroeconomic theory. Academic Press, San Diego.
38. Sims C (1972) Money, income, and causality. Am Econ Rev 62: 540-552.
39. Sims C (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48: 1-48.
40. Sims C (1982) Policy analysis with econometric models. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1: 107-152.
41. Sims C (1992) Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts. Eur Econ Rev 36: 975-1000.
42. Spelman W (2000) What recent studies do (and don't) tell us about imprisonment and crime. In: Tonry M (ed) Crime and justice: a review of research vol. 27. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
43. Stolzenberg L, D'Alessio S (2004) Capital punishment, execution publicity, and murder in Houston, Texas. J Crim Law Criminol 94: 351-379.
44. Zeisel H (1982) Disagreement over the evaluation of a controlled experiment. Am J Sociol 88: 378-389.
45. Zimring F, Fagan J, Johnson D (2010) Executions, deterrence, and homicide: a tale of two cities. J Empir Leg Stud 7: 1-29.