Performance comparison of affymetrix SNP6.0 and cytogenetic 2.7M whole-genome microarrays in complex cancer samples

Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Volumn 139, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 80-87

  Bodker J S ^a   Gyrup, C ^b   Johansen, P ^a   Schmitz, A ^a   Madsen, J ^a   Johnsen, H E ^a   Bogsted M ^a,b   Dybkaer K ^a   Nyegaard, M ^a,c  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Array comparison; Complex cancer samples; Cytogenetic 2.7M whole genome array; Genomic aberrations; SNP6.0 array

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA;

ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; BLOOD SAMPLING; CANCER GENETICS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA DETERMINATION; GENE DOSAGE; GENE LOCUS; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARGE CELL LYMPHOMA; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; CHROMOSOME 7Q; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA PURIFICATION; HUMAN TISSUE; MICROARRAY KIT; MOSAICISM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; DNA, NEOPLASM; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; LOSS OF HETEROZYGOSITY; NEOPLASMS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84873738382     PISSN: 14248581     EISSN: 1424859X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000345125     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aswini S, Padmalatha VO, Saranya G, Durgadatta T, Raseswari T, et al: De novo 7p partial trisomy characterized by subtelomeric FISH and whole-genome array in a girl with mental retardation. Mol Cytogenet 4: 21 (2011).
2. Bardini M, Galbiati M, Lettieri A, Bungaro S, Gorletta TA, et al: Implementation of array based whole-genome high-resolution technologies confirms the absence of secondary copy-number alterations in MLL-AF4-positive infant ALL patients. Leukemia 25: 175-178 (2011).
3. Bea S, Zettl A, Wright G, Salaverria I, Jehn P, et al: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subgroups have distinct genetic profiles that influence tumor biology and improve gene-expression-based survival prediction. Blood 106: 3183-3190 (2005).
4. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, et al: The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55: 611-622 (2009).
5. Cowell JK, Lo KC: Application of oligonucleotides arrays for coincident comparative genomic hybridization, ploidy status and loss of heterozygosity studies in human cancers. Methods Mol Biol 556: 47-65 (2009).
6. Curtis C, Lynch AG, Dunning MJ, Spiteri I, Marioni JC, et al: The pitfalls of platform comparison: DNA copy number array technologies assessed. BMC Genomics 10: 588 (2009).
7. Eckel-Passow JE, Atkinson EJ, Maharjan S, Kardia SL, de Andrade M: Software comparison for evaluating genomic copy number variation for Affymetrix 6.0 SNP array platform. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 220 (2011).
8. Hanemaaijer NM, Sikkema-Raddatz B, van der Vries G, Dijkhuizen T, Hordijk R, et al: Practical guidelines for interpreting copy number gains detected by high-resolution array in routine diagnostics. Eur J Hum Genet 20: 161-165 (2012).
9. Harvard C, Strong E, Mercier E, Colnaghi R, Alcantara D, et al: Understanding the impact of 1q21.1 copy number variant. Orphanet J Rare Dis 6: 54 (2011).
10. Hochstenbach R, Buizer-Voskamp JE, Vorstman JA, Ophoff RA: Genome arrays for the detection of copy number variations in idiopathic mental retardation, idiopathic generalized epilepsy and neuropsychiatric disorders: lessons for diagnostic workflow and research. Cytogenet Genome Res 135: 174-202 (2011).
11. Kurban M, Kim CA, Kiuru M, Fantauzzo K, Cabral R, et al: Copy number variations on chromosome 4q26-27 are associated with Cantu syndrome. Dermatology 223: 316-320 (2011).
12. Pinto D, Darvishi K, Shi X, Rajan D, Rigler D, et al: Comprehensive assessment of arraybased platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variants. Nat Biotechnol 29: 512-520 (2011).
13. Qiao Y, Tyson C, Hrynchak M, Lopez-Rangel E, Hildebrand J, et al: Clinical application of 2.7M Cytogenetics array for CNV detection in subjects with idiopathic autism and/or intellectual disability. Clin Genet (2012) doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01860.x
14. Rodriguez-Revenga L, Mila M, Rosenberg C, Lamb A, Lee C: Structural variation in the human genome: the impact of copy number variants on clinical diagnosis. Genet Med 9: 600-606 (2007).
15. Rozen S, Skaletsky H: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 132: 365-386 (2000)
16. Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO: Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270: 467-470 (1995).
17. Shlien A, Malkin D: Copy number variations and cancer susceptibility. Curr Opin Oncol 22: 55-63 (2010).
18. Tucker T, Montpetit A, Chai D, Chan S, Chenier S, et al: Comparison of genome-wide array genomic hybridization platforms for the detection of copy number variants in idiopathic mental retardation. BMC Med Genomics 4: 25 (2011).