Erratum to: A spatial cross-correlation model of spectral accelerations at multiple periods: SPATIAL CROSS-CORRELATION OF MULTIPLE-PERIOD SPECTRAL ACCELERATIONS (Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, (2013), 42, 3, (397-417), 10.1002/eqe.2212);A spatial cross-correlation model of spectral accelerations at multiple periods

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 397-417

  Loth, Christophe ^a   Baker, Jack W ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Infrastructure systems; Multiple periods; Risk assessment; Spatial correlation; Spectral accelerations

Indexed keywords

RISK ASSESSMENT;

CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DISTRIBUTED INFRASTRUCTURE; EMPIRICAL CORRELATIONS; GROUND MOTION INTENSITIES; INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS; MULTIPLE PERIODS; SPATIAL CORRELATIONS; SPECTRAL ACCELERATION;

EARTHQUAKES;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; GROUND MOTION; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84873731237     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3233     Document Type: Erratum

References (25)

1. Goda K, Hong HP. Spatial correlation of peak ground motions and response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2008; 98(1): 354-365. DOI: 10.1785/0120070078.
2. Boore DM, Atkinson GM. Ground motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01s and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra 2008; 24(1):99-138.
3. Abrahamson N, Silva W. Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground motion relations. Earthquake Spectra 2008; 24(1):67-97.
4. Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR. An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra 2008; 24(1):173-215.
5. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y. Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters. Technical Report PEER 2007/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California 2007.
6. Jayaram N, Baker JW. Statistical tests of the joint distribution of spectral acceleration values. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2008; 98(5):2231-2243. DOI: 10.1785/0120070208.
7. Foulser-Piggott R, Stafford PJ. A predictive model for Arias intensity at multiple sites and consideration of spatial correlations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2011; :n/a URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1137.
8. Esposito S, Iervolino I. PGA and PGV spatial correlation models based on European multievent datasets. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2011; 101(5):2532-2541. DOI: 10.1785/0120110117. URL http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/101/5/2532.
9. Boore DM, Gibbs JF, Joyner WB, Tinsley JC, Ponti DJ. Estimated ground motion from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake at the site of the Interstate 10 and La Cienega Boulevard bridge collapse, West Los Angeles, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2003; 93(6):2737-2751.
10. Wang M, Takada T. Macrospatial correlation model of seismic ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2005; 21(4):1137-1156.
11. Baker JW, Jayaram N. Correlation of spectral acceleration values from NGA ground motion models. Earthquake Spectra 2008; 24(1):299-317. DOI: 10.1193/1.2857544.
12. Jayaram N, Baker JW. Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2009; 38(15): 1687-1708. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.922. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.922.
13. Loth C, Baker JW. Spatial cross-correlation of spectral accelerations at multiple periods: model development and risk assessments considering secondary earthquake effects. Technical Report USGS award G10AP00046. 2011.
14. Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ. Mining geostatistics. Academic Press: London; New York, 1978.
15. Goovaerts P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press: USA, 1997.
16. Bazzurro P, Luco N. Effects of different sources of uncertainty and correlation on earthquake-generated losses. Stoos: Switzerland, 2004; 20.
17. Summary of scaling relations for spectral damping, peak velocity, and average spectral acceleration: Report for the PEGASOS project. Personal communication.
18. Inoue T, Cornell CA. Seismic hazard analysis of multi-degree-of-freedom structures. Technical Report #RMS-8, Reliability of Marine Structures, Stanford, CA 1990.
19. Wackernagel H. Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Berlin: Springer. edn., 1995.
20. Jackel P. Monte Carlo methods in finance. J. Wiley & Sons: Chichester, West Sussex, England, 2002.
21. Majumdar A, Gelfand A. Multivariate spatial modeling for geostatistical data using convolved covariance functions. Mathematical Geology 2007; 39(2):225-245. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11004-006-9072-6.
22. Banerjee S, Gelfand A, Carlin B. Multivariate spatial modeling. Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data. C&H/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2004. 0.
23. Goulard M, Voltz M. Linear coregionalization model: Tools for estimation and choice of cross-variogram matrix. Mathematical Geology 1992; 24(3):269-286. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00893750.
24. Goda K. Interevent variability of spatial correlation of peak ground motions and response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2011; 101(5):2522-2531. DOI: 10.1785/0120110092. URL http://www.bssaonline.org/content/101/5/2522.abstract.
25. Journel AG. Markov models for cross-covariances. Mathematical Geology 1999; 31(8):955-964. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007553013388.