Epistemic Entanglement due to Non-generating Partitions of Classical Dynamical Systems

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 723-734

  Beim Graben, Peter ^a   Filk, Thomas ^b   Atmanspacher, Harald ^c  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c Institut Für Grenzgebiete der Psychologie und Psychohygiene   (Germany)

Author keywords

Classical dynamical systems; Coupled oscillators; Entanglement; Partitions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873722306     PISSN: 00207748     EISSN: 15729575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10773-012-1381-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allahverdyan, A. E., Khrennikov, A., Nieuwenhuizen, T. M.: Brownian entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 72, 032102 (2005).
2. Atmanspacher, H.: Quantum approaches to consciousness. In: Zalta, E. N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011). plato. stanford. edu/entries/qt-consciousness/.
3. Atmanspacher, H., Primas, H.: Epistemic and ontic quantum realities. In: Castell, L., Ischebeck, O. (eds.) Time, Quantum and Information, pp. 301-321. Springer, Berlin (2003).
4. Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T., beim Graben, P.: Can classical epistemic states be entangled? In: Song, D., et al. (eds.) Quantum Interaction-QI 2011, pp. 105-115. Springer, Berlin (2011).
5. Bollt, E. M., Stanford, T., Lai, Y. C., Życzkowski, K.: What symbolic dynamics do we get with a misplaced partition? On the validity of threshold crossings analysis of chaotic time-series. Physica D 154, 259-286 (2001).
6. Bruza, P. D., Kitto, K., Nelson, D., McEvoy, C. L.: Is there something quantum-like about the human mental lexicon? J. Math. Psychol. 53, 362-377 (2009).
7. Cornfeld, I. P., Fomin, S. V., Sinai, Y. G.: Ergodic Theory. Springer, Berlin (1982).
8. Dvurečenskij, A., Pulmannová, S., Svozil, K.: Partition logics, orthoalgebras and automata. Helv. Phys. Acta 68, 407-428 (1995).
9. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47(10), 777-780 (1935).
10. Foulis, D. J.: A half-century of quantum logic. What have we learned? In: Aerts, D. (ed.) Quantum Structures and the Nature of Reality, Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Science, Nature, Art, Human Action and Society, vol. 7, pp. 1-36. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1999).
11. van Gelder, T.: The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Brain Behav. Sci. 21, 1-14 (1998).
12. beim Graben, P., Atmanspacher, H.: Complementarity in classical dynamical systems. Found. Phys. 36, 291-306 (2006).
13. beim Graben, P., Atmanspacher, H.: Extending the philosophical significance of the idea of complementarity. In: Atmanspacher, H., Primas, H. (eds.) Recasting Reality. Wolfgang Pauli's Philosophical Ideas and Contemporary Science, pp. 99-113. Springer, Berlin (2009).
14. Khrennikov, A. Y.: Representation of the Kolmogorov model having all distinguishing features of quantum probabilistic model. Phys. Lett. A 316(5), 279-296 (2003).
15. Khrennikov, A. Y.: Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance. Springer, Berlin (2010).
16. Kolmogorov, A. N.: New metric invariant of transitive dynamical systems and endomorphisms of Lebesgue spaces. Dokl. Russ. Acad. Sci. 119, 861-864 (1958).
17. Lind, D. A., Marcus, B.: An Introduction to Symbolic Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).
18. Pauli, W.: Die philosophische Bedeutung der Idee der Komplementarität. Experientia 6, 72-81 (1950). English translation: The philosophical significance of the notion of complementarity. In: Enz, C. P., von Meyenn, K. (eds.) Wolfgang Pauli. Writings on Physics and Philosophy, pp. 35-42 Springer, Berlin (1994).
19. Schrödinger, E.: Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 31, 555-563 (1935).
20. Sinai, Y. G.: On the concept of entropy of a dynamical system. Dokl. Russ. Acad. Sci. 124, 768-771 (1959).
21. Svozil, K.: Logical equivalence between generalized urn models and finite automata. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44, 745-754 (2005).
22. Walters, P.: Introduction to Ergodic Theory. Springer, Berlin (1981).
23. Wright, R.: Generalized urn models. Found. Phys. 20, 881-903 (1990).