Systematic index frame for functional assessment of constructed wetlands

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 73, Issue , 2013, Pages 145-152

  Chang, Hui Ting ^a   Yang, Lei ^a   Yeh, Shin Cheng ^b   Chen, Ho Wen ^c  

^a NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c TUNGHAI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS (CWS); CULTURAL ASSETS; DRIVING FORCES; ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING; ECOSYSTEM HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL FUNCTIONS; FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY; HYDROLOGICAL CONDITION; INDEX SYSTEMS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE PLANNING; PROTECTION OF WATER RESOURCES; RESOURCE CONSERVATION; SERVICE FACTORS; SOCIO-ECONOMICS; WATER PURIFICATION;

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; PLANTS (BOTANY); SURVEYS; WATER RESOURCES; WATER SUPPLY;

WETLANDS;

CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; WASTEWATER; WATER RESOURCE;

TAIWAN;

EID: 84873719157     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Benyamine M., Bäckström M., Sandén P. Multi-objective environmental management in constructed wetland. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2004, 90:171-185.
2. Bobbink R., Eltman B.B., Verhoeven J.A., Whigham D.F. Wetlands: Functioning, Biodiversity Conservation and Restoration. Ecological Studies 191 2006, vol. 191. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp.1-12.
3. Breaux A., Cochrane S., Evens J., Martindale M., Pavlik B., Suer L., Benner D. Wetland ecological and compliance assessments in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, USA. J. Environ. Manage. 2005, 74:217-237.
4. Butcher R. Options for the Assessment and Monitoring of Wetland Condition in Victoria 2003, State Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Committee (SWQMAC), The State of Victoria. http://www.dse.vic.org.au.
5. Campbell D.A., Cole C.A., Brooks R.P. A comparison of created and natural wetlands in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 10:41-49.
6. Carlisle, B.K., Smith, J.P., Hicks A.L., Largay, B.G., Garcia, S.R., 1998. Wetland Ecological Integrity: An Assessment Approach. Waquoit Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. The Coastal Wetlands Ecosystem Protection Project. NOAA # NA57 OC 0470. http://www.mass.gov/czm/wetlandecologicalintegrity.pdf.
7. Carr E.R., Wingard P.M., Yorty S.C., Thompson M.C., Jensen N.K., Roberson J. Applying DPSIR to sustainable development. J. Sustain. Develop. World Ecol. 2007, 14(6):543-555.
8. Chang H.T., Yang L., Yeh S.C. Initial investigation of establishing the functional assessment for constructed wetlands. 2009 The 3rd IWA-ASPIRE Conference and Exhibition. Taipei, Taiwan. 19-21, Oct, 2009 2009.
9. Chang H.T., Yang L., Wu Y.M., Chen S.M., Kuo H.C., Chen C.Y. Development of integral assessment system for constructed wetlands: case studies in Taiwan. J. Manag. Sci. Stat. Decis. 2010, 7(1):11-17.
10. Chen Y.C. The Study of Restoration and Ecotechnology Assessment Framework on Farmland Wetland in Taiwan-application of Wetland Evaluation Methods 2004, NSC 93-2218-E-212-003, National Science Council.
11. Cole C.A. HGM and wetland functional assessment: six degrees of separation from the data?. Ecol. Indic. 2006, 6:485-493.
12. Cole C.A., Urban C., Russo P., Murray J., Hoyt D., Brooks R.P. Comparison of the long-tern water levels of created and natural reference wetlands in northern New York, USA. Ecol. Eng. 2006, 27:166-172.
13. Colorado Riparian Association: http://www.coloradoriparian.org.
14. Don F.L., Rocchio J., Schafale M., Nordman C., Pyne M., Teague J., Foti T., Comer P. Ecological Integrity Assessment and Performance Measures for Wetland Mitigation 2006, Nature Serve Arlington, Virginia, USA, Nature Serve 1101 Wilson Blvd. 15th Floor Arlington, Virginia, USA 22209 703-908-1800.
15. Fennessy M.S., Jacobs A.D., Kentula M.E. Review of Rapid Methods for Assessing Wetland Condition 2004, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research, Triangle Park, NC, 27711, EPA/620/R-04/009.
16. Herath G. Incorporation community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process. J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 70:263-273.
17. Hey D.L., Philippi N.S. A Case of Wetland Restroration 1999, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 63-69.
18. Hruby T. Assessments of wetland functions: what they are and what they are not. Environ. Manage. 1999, 23(1):75-85.
19. Hruby T. Testing the basic assumption of the hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions. Environ. Manage. 2001, 27(5):749-761.
20. Hruby T., Stanley S., Granger T., Deubendorfer T., Lang B., March K., Wald A. Method for assessing wetland functions volume II: depressional wetlands in the Columbia Basin of Eastern Washington. Part 1: assessment methods. Ecol. Publ. 2000, 35-42. #00-06-47.
21. Huang Y., Zhou G.S., Wu J.S., Yan X.D. Modeling Carbon Budgets of Terrestrial Ecosystem in China 2007, Science Press, Beijing, pp. 164-206.
22. ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council) Characterization, Design, Construction, and Monitoring of Mitigation Wetlands Council. WTLAND-2 2005, Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Mitigation Wetlands Team, Washington, D.C. http://www.itrcweb.org.
23. Janssen R., Goosen H., Verhoeven M.L., Verhoeven J.T.A., Omtzigt A.Q.A., Maltby E. Decision support for integrated wetland management. Environ. Model. Softw. 2005, 20:215-229.
24. Lin, N.K., Chang, L.S., 2004. A Study on the Life Cycle Costing (LCC) of Water Features of Elementary Schools - Elementary Schools in Taichung City, thesis.
25. Lin Y.F., Jing S.R., Chang Y.F., Liou R.M., Huang D.T., Huang Y.T. Emission nitrous oxide and methane from a constructed wetland system treating campus wastewater. Present in The Second Mainland - Taiwan Conference for Constructed Wetland, Taiwan 2009.
26. Liu H.T. A study on wetland and ecology system can keep on the development in Yellow River Delta. Water Conservancy Sci. Technol. Economy 2006, 112(111):754-756.
27. Liu K.R. Evaluating environmental sustainability: an integration of multiple-criteria decision-making and fuzzy logic. J. Sci. Eng. Tech. 2006, 2(3):29-47.
28. Loiselle S., Rossi C., Sabio G., Canziani G. The use of system analysis methods in the sustainable management of wetlands. Hydrobiologia 2001, 458:191-200.
29. Mitsch W.J. Wetland creation, restoration, and conservation: a wetland invitational at the Olentongy River wetland research park. Ecol. Eng. 2005, 24:243-251.
30. Mitsch J.W., Jorgensen S.E. Ecological Engineering and Ecosystem Restoration 2003, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 125-162.
31. O'Connor T.G., Kuyler P. Impact of land use on the biodiversity integrity of the moist sub-biome of the grassland biome, South Africa. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90(1):384-395.
32. Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2007-3A. Ohio environmental protection Agency, Wetland Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, Ohio: http://www.epa.state.oh.us/portals/35/wetlands/L919ReportVol_1_EcologAssessUrbanWTLDs.pdf.
33. The Governor's Office of Energy Management and Conservation (OMEC): http://www.state.co.us/oemc/programs/waste/wetlands/wetland_report.
34. Pereira H.M., Cooper H.D. Towards the global monitoring of biodiversity change. TRENDS Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21(3):123-129.
35. Report No.0950277 The Study of Establishing Evaluation Assessment to Check Case of Ecological Engineering 2006, Public Construction Commission.
36. Smith, R.D., Ammann, A., Bartoldus, C., and Brinson, M.M., 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. Us Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C., Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-9.
37. Sonntaga D.H., Coleb C.A. Determining the feasibility and cost of an ecologically-based design for a mitigation wetland in central Pennsylvania, USA. Landscape Urban Plan. 2008, 87:10-21.
38. Spieles D.J., Coneybeer M., Horn J. Community structure and quality after 10 years in two central Ohio mitigation bank wetland. Environ. Manage. 2006, 38:837-852.
39. Ting C.S., Li I.T., Tsai H.T. Research on semi-tidal wetland hydrology system and its effectiveness of flood detention: a case study of Dapeng Bay Pengchen constructed wetland. J. Taiwan Agric. Eng. 2009, 54(1):56-69.
40. Urban and Rural Development Branch Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior 2009, R.O.C. http://www.tcd.gov.tw/.
41. Wang Y.J., Deng W. Establishment of index system of sustainability measurement on wetland water environment. Wetl. Sci. 2006, 4(4):253-257.
42. Whitterecar G.R., Daniels W.L. Use of hydrogeomorphic concepts to design created wetlands in southeastern Virginia. Geomorphology 1999, 31:355-371.
43. Yang S., Li Y., Lü Y. The assessment index system of Zhalong wetland eco2security. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 2006, 42(5):127-132.
44. Zalidis G.C., Tsiafouli M.A., Takavakoglou V., Bilas G., Misopolinos N. Selecting agri-environmental indicators to facilitate monitoring and assessment of EU agri-environmental measures effectiveness. J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 70:315-332.
45. Zedler J.B., Callaway J.C. Evaluating the progress of engineered tidal wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2000, 15:211-225.