Document classification using a finite mixture model

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1997-July, Issue , 1997, Pages 39-47

  Li, Hang ^a   Yamanishi, Kenji ^a  

^a C&C Research Lab   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION; EM ALGORITHMS; FINITE MIXTURE MODELING; MODEL-BASED OPC; SOFT CLUSTERING; STATISTICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 84873693572     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Apte, Chidanand, Fred Damerau, and Sholom M. Weiss. 1994. Automated learning of decision rules for text categorization. ACM Tran. on Information Systems, 12(3):233-251.
2. Cohen, William W. and Yoram Singer. 1996. Context-sensitive learning methods for text categorization. Proc. of SIGIR'96.
3. Deerwester, Scott, Susan T. Dumais, George W. Furnas, Thomas K. Landauer, and Richard Harsh-man. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journ. of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6):391-407.
4. Dempster, A.P., N.M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journ. of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1):1-38.
5. Everitt, B. and D. Hand. 1981. Finite Mixture Distributions. London: Chapman and Hall.
6. Fuhr, Norbert. 1989. Models for retrieval with probabilistic indexing. Information Processing and Management, 25(1):55-72.
7. Gale, Williams A. and Kenth W. Church. 1990. Poor estimates of context are worse than none. Proc. of the DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, pages 283-287.
8. Guthrie, Louise, Elbert Walker, and Joe Guthrie. 1994. Document classification by machine: Theory and practice. Proc. of COLING'94, pages 1059-1063.
9. Helmbold, D., R. Schapire, Y. Siuger, and M. Warmuth. 1995. A comparison of new and old algorithm for a mixture estimation problem. Proc. of COLT'95, pages 61-68.
10. Jelinek, F. and R.I. Mercer. 1980. Interpolated estimation of markov source parameters from sparse data. Proc. of Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Practice, pages 381-402.
11. Lewis, David D. 1992. An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task. Proc. of SIGIR'9~, pages 37-50.
12. Lewis, David D. and Marc Ringuette. 1994. A comparison of two learning algorithms for test categorization. Proc. of 3rd Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, pages 81-93.
13. Lewis, David D., Robert E. Schapire, James P. Callan, and Ron Papka. 1996. Training algorithms for linear text classifiers. Proc. of SIGIR'96.
14. Pereira, Fernando, Naftali Tishby, and Lillian Lee. 1993. Distributional clustering of english words. Proc. of ACL '93, pages 183-190.
15. Robertson, S.E. and K. Sparck Jones. 1976. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journ. of the American Society for Information Science, 27:129-146.
16. Salton, G. and M.J. McGiU. 1983. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. New York: Mc-Graw Hill.
17. Schutze, Hinrich, David A. Hull, and Jan O. Pedersen. 1995. A comparison of classifiers and document representations for the routing problem. Proc. of SIGIR '95.
18. Tanner, Martin A. and Wing Hung Wong. 1987. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journ. of the American Statistical Association, 82(398):528-540.
19. Wong, S.K.M. and Y.Y. Ya~. 1989. A probability distribution model for information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 25(1):39-53.
20. Yamanishi, Kenji. 1996. A randomized approximation of the mdl for stochastic models with hidden variables. Proc. of COLT'96, pages 99-109.
21. Yang, Yiming and Christoper G. Chute. 1994. An example-based mapping method for text categorization and retrieval. ACM Tran. on Information Systems, 12(3):252-277.