The role of water availability on weed-crop interactions in processing tomato for southern Italy

Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B: Soil and Plant Science

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 62-68

  Valerio, Maria ^a   Lovelli, Stella ^a   Perniola, Michele ^a   Di Tommaso, Teodoro ^a   Ziska, Lewis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA   (Italy)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; gas exchange; leaf water potential; Lycopersicon esculentum; stomatal control; water competition

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 84873678669     PISSN: 09064710     EISSN: 16511913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09064710.2012.715184     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. & Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage. Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome, Italy.
2. Donald, W. W. and Khan, M. 1982. Yield loss assessment for spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) infested with Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Science, 40: 590-598.
3. Doorenbos, J. & Pruitt, W. O. 1977. Crop water requirements. FAO Irrig. Drain. Paper No. 24. FAO, Rome, Italy.
4. Favati, F., Lovelli, S., Galgano, F., Miccolis, V., Di Tomasso, T. and Candido, V. 2009. Processing tomato quality as affected by irrigation scheduling. Scientia Horticulturae, 122: 562-571. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2009.06.026
5. Friesen, G. F. 1979. Weed interference in transplanted tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Science, 27: 11-13.
6. Giorgi, F. and Lionello, P. 2008. Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Global and Planetary Change, 63: 90-104. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005
7. Hargreaves, G. H. and Samani, Z. A. 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Applied Engineering and Agriculture, 1: 96-99.
8. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V. and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology, Honolulu, Hawaii: East-West Center/University Press of Hawaii.
9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007. Climatic Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).
10. 2, drought and weed competition on carbon isotope discrimination in wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaves. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 81: 1026-1029.
11. Oerke, E.-D. and Dehne, H. W. 2004. Safeguarding production losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Protection, 23: 275-285. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2003.10.001
12. Olesen, J. E. and Bindi, M. 2002. Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. European Journal of Agronomy, 16: 239-262. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00004-7
13. Patterson, D. T. 1995. Effects of environmental stress on weed/crop interactions. Weed Science, 43: 483-490.
14. Patterson, D. T. and Highsmith, H. T. 1989. Competition of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) during simulated drought and recovery. Weed Science, 37: 658-664.
15. Pervez, M. A., Ayub, C. M., Khan, H. A., Shahid, M. A. and Ashraf, I. 2009. Effect of drought stress on growth, yield and seed quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science, 46: 174-178.
16. Rajcan, I. and Swanton, C. J. 2001. Understanding maize-weed competition: Resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crops Research, 71: 139-150. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00159-9
17. Rinaldi, M., Ventrella, D. and Gagliano, C. 2007. Comparison of nitrogen and irrigation strategies in tomato using CROPGRO model. A case study from Southern Italy. Agricultural Water Management, 87: 91-105. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.006
18. Rossi, G., Cancelliere, A., Pereira, L. A., Oweis, T., Shatanawi, M. and Zairi, A. 2003. Drought Mitigation in Mediterranean Regions, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Publishers.
19. Royal, S. S., Brecke, B. J. and Colvin, D. L. 1997. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference with peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Science, 45: 38-43.
20. Sutton, K. F., Lanini, W. T., Mitchell, J. P., Miyao, E. M. and Shrestha, A. 2006. Weed control, yield and quality of processing tomato production under different irrigation, tillage and herbicide systems. Weed Technology, 4: 831-838. doi:10.1614/WT-05-057.1
21. Vitale, D., Rana, G. and Soldo, P. 2010. Trends and extremes analysis of daily weather data from a site in the Capitanata plain (Southern Italy). Italian Journal of Agronomy, 5: 133-143. doi:10.4081/ija.2010.133
22. World Processing Tomato Council. 2006. Accessed 28 June 2012, available at: http://www.wptc.to/releses/releases10.pdf
23. Zimdahl, R. L. 2004. Weed-crop Competition, Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing.
24. Ziska, L. H. 2010. "Global climate change and carbon dioxide: Assessing weed biology and management". In Handbook of Climate Change and Agro-Ecosystems: Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation, Edited by: Rosenzweig, C. and Hillel, D. 191-208. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
25. Ziska, L. H. and Goins, E. W. 2006. Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and weed populations in glyphosate treated soybean. Crop Science, 46: 1354-1359. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.10-0378