The effect of bone lavage on femoral cement penetration and interface temperature during oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 48-53

  Seeger, J B ^a   Jaeger, S ^b   Bitsch, R G ^b   Mohr, G ^c   Rohner E ^d   Clarius, M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c Vulpius Klinik GmbH   (Germany)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BONE INJURY; BONE LAVAGE; CADAVER; FEMUR; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LAVAGE; LIGAMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERMAL INJURY; TRABECULAR BONE;

EID: 84873669229     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01116     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Vorlat P, Putzeys G, Cottenie D, Van Isacker T, Pouliart N, Handelberg F, Casteleyn PP, Gheysen F, Verdonk R. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Jan;14(1):40-5. Epub 2005 May 14.
2. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Nov;80(6):983-9.
3. Aldinger PR, Clarius M, Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, Breusch SJ. [Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the "Oxford Uni" meniscal bearing knee]. Orthopade. 2004 Nov;33(11):1277-83. German.
4. Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U. Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jun;(435):171-80.
5. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2008.
6. Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998 Oct;69(5):469-74.
7. Kalra S, Smith TO, Berko B, Walton NP. Assessment of radiolucent lines around the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: sensitivity and specificity for loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jun;93(6):777-81.
8. Halawa M, Lee AJ, Ling RS, Vangala SS. The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1978 Aug 11;92(1):19-30.
9. Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J. Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Mar;(163):290-9.
10. Askew MJ, Steege JW, Lewis JL, Ranieri JR, Wixson RL. Effect of cement pressure and bone strength on polymethylmethacrylate fixation. J Orthop Res. 1984; 1(4):412-20.
11. MacDonald W, Swarts E, Beaver R. Penetration and shear strength of cementbone interfaces in vivo. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jan;(286):283-8.
12. Mann KA, Ayers DC, Werner FW, Nicoletta RJ, Fortino MD. Tensile strength of the cement-bone interface depends on the amount of bone interdigitated with PMMA cement. J Biomech. 1997 Apr;30(4):339-46.
13. Breusch SJ, Norman TL, Schneider U, Reitzel T, Blaha JD, Lukoschek M. Lavage technique in total hip arthroplasty: jet lavage produces better cement penetration than syringe lavage in the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty. 2000 Oct;15(7):921-7.
14. Wirtz D, Sellei RM, Portheine F, Prescher A, Weber M. [Effect of femoral intramedullary irrigation on periprosthetic cement distribution: jet lavage versus syringe lavage]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001 Sep-Oct;139(5):410-4. German.
15. Gisep A, Curtis R, Flütsch S, Suhm N. Augmentation of osteoporotic bone: effect of pulsed jet-lavage on injection forces, cement distribution, and push-out strength of implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006 Jul;78(1):83-8.
16. Borzacchiello A, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L, Harper EJ, Tanner KE, Bonfield W. Isothermal and non-isothermal polymerization of a new bone cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1998 Jun;9(6):317-24.
17. Breusch SJ, Kühn KD. [Bone cements based on polymethylmethacrylate]. Orthopade. 2003 Jan;32(1):41-50. German.
18. Ebramzadeh E, Sarmiento A, McKellop HA, Llinas A, Gogan W. The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Jan;76(1):77-87.
19. Goodfellow JW, Kershaw CJ, Benson MK, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford Knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Nov;70(5):692-701.
20. Svärd UC, Price AJ. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Mar;83(2):191-4.
21. Goodfellow J, O'Connor JJ, Dodd C, Murray D. Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee. New York, Oxford University Press; 2006.
22. Kalra S, Smith TO, Berko B, Walton NP. Assessment of radiolucent lines around the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: sensitivity and specificity for loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jun;93(6):777-81.
23. Monk AP, Keys GW, Murray DW. Loosening of the femoral component after unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Mar;91(3): 405-7.
24. Robertsson O. Unicompartmental arthroplasty. Results in Sweden 1986-1995. Orthopade. 2000 Jun;29 Suppl 1:S6-8.
25. Goodfellow J, O'Connor J, Murray DW. The Oxford meniscal unicompartmental knee. J Knee Surg. 2002 Fall;15(4):240-6.
26. Lewold S, Goodman S, Knutson K, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicenter survival study. J Arthroplasty. 1995 Dec; 10(6):722-31.
27. Lee C. The importance of establishing the best bone cement interface. In: Breusch S, Malchau H, editors. The well-cemented total hip arthroplasty: theory and practice. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2005. p 119-124.
28. Waanders D, Janssen D, Mann KA, Verdonschot N. The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface. J Biomech. 2010 Apr 19;43(6):1167-75.
29. Ranawat CS, Peters LE, Umlas ME. Fixation of the acetabular component: the case for cement. J Arthroplasty. 1996 Jan;11(1):1-3; discussion 6.
30. Mulroy WF, Estok DM, Harris WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Dec;77(12):1845-52.
31. Beckenbaugh RD, Ilstrup DM. Total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Apr;60(3):306-13.
32. Panjabi MM, Cimino WR, Drinker H. Effect of pressure on bone cement stiffness. An in vitro study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986 Apr;57(2):106-10.
33. Schlegel UJ, Siewe J, Delank KS, Eysel P, Püschel K, Morlock MM, de Uhlenbrock AG. Pulsed lavage improves fixation strength of cemented tibial components. Int Orthop. 2011 Aug;35(8):1165-9. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
34. Miskovsky C, Whiteside LA, White SE. The cemented unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of three cement techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Nov;(284):215-20.
35. Bert JM,McShane M. Is it necessary to cement the tibial stem in cemented total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Nov;(356):73-8.
36. ClariusM, Hauck C, Seeger JB, James A, Murray DW, Aldinger PR. Pulsed lavage reduces the incidence of radiolucent lines under the tibial tray of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: pulsed lavage versus syringe lavage. Int Orthop. 2009 Dec;33(6):1585-90. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
37. Schlegel UJ, Siewe J, Delank KS, Eysel P, Püschel K, Morlock MM, de Uhlenbrock AG. Pulsed lavage improves fixation strength of cemented tibial components. Int Orthop. 2011 Aug;35(8):1165-9. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
38. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Jan;76(1):60-5.
39. Joshi RP, Eftekhar NS, McMahon DJ, Nercessian OA. Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty. A comparison of two matched paired groups. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jul;80(4):585-90.
40. Oates KM, Barrera DL, Tucker WN, Chau CC, Bugbee WD, Convery FR. In vivo effect of pressurization of polymethyl methacrylate bone-cement. Biomechanical and histologic analysis. J Arthroplasty. 1995 Jun;10(3):373-81.
41. Sih GC, Connelly GM, Berman AT. The effect of thickness and pressure on the curing of PMMA bone cement for the total hip joint replacement. J Biomech. 1980; 13(4):347-52.
42. Willert HG, Ludwig J, Semlitsch M. Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty: a long-term gross, light microscopic, and scanning electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Oct;56(7):1368-82.
43. Paul HA, Bargar WL. Histologic changes in the dog femur following total hip replacement with current cementing techniques. J Arthroplasty. 1986; 1(1):5-9.
44. Kalteis T, Pförringer D, Herold T, Handel M, Renkawitz T, Plitz W. An experimental comparison of different devices for pulsatile high-pressure lavage and their relevance to cement intrusion into cancellous bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Dec;127(10):873-7. Epub 2007 Sep 1.
45. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Jul; 50(1):101-7.
46. Eriksson RA, Albrektsson T. The effect of heat on bone regeneration: an experimental study in the rabbit using the bone growth chamber. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984 Nov;42(11):705-11.