Australian health-related quality of life population norms derived from the SF-6D

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 17-23

  Norman, Richard ^a   Church, Jody ^a   Van Den Berg, Bernard ^b   Goodall, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Australia; Population norms; SF 6D; Socioeconomic status

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BODY MASS; EQUIPMENT; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX RATIO; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AUSTRALIA; BODY MASS INDEX; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873643981     PISSN: 13260200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health Expenditure Australia 2008-09. Canberra (ASUT): AIHW; 2010.
2. van den Berg B. SF-6D Population Norms. Health Econ. 2012;21(12):1508-12.
3. Stolk EA, Krabbe P, Busschbach J. Using the internet to collect EQ-5D norm scores: a valid alternative? In: Busschbach J, Rabin R, De Charro F, editors. 24th Scientific Plenary Meeting of the EuroQol Group; 2009; Kijkduin-The Hague, The Netherlands, September 13-15 2007; 2009.
4. Sun S, Chen J, Johannesson M, Kind P, Xu L, Zhang Y, et al. Population health status in China: EQ-5D results, by age, sex and socio-economic status, from the National Health Services Survey 2008. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(3):309-20.
5. Gundgaard J, Lauridsen J. A decomposition of income-related health inequality applied to EQ-5D. Euro J Health Econ. 2006;7(4):231-7.
6. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271-92.
7. Ware J, Snow K, Kolinski M, Gandeck B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre; 1993.
8. Kharroubi SA, Brazier JE, Roberts J, O'Hagan A. Modelling SF-6D health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method. J Health Econ. 2007;26(3):597-612.
9. Brazier JE, Fukuhara S, Roberts J, Kharroubi S, Yamamoto Y, Ikeda S, et al. Estimating a preference-based index from the Japanese SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(12):1323-31.
10. Ferreira L, Ferreira P, Pereira L, Brazier J. An application of the SF-6D to create heath values in Portuguese working age adults. J Med Econ. 2008;11(2):215-33.
11. Gonçalves Campolina A, Bruscato Bortoluzzo A, Bosi Ferraz M, Mesquita Ciconelli R. Validity of the SF-6D index in Brazilian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27(2):237-45.
12. Lam CL, Brazier J, McGhee SM. Valuation of the SF-6D Health States Is Feasible, Acceptable, Reliable, and Valid in a Chinese Population. Value Health. 2008;11(2):295-303.
13. Aggarwal R, Wilke CT, Pickard AS, Vats V, Mikolaitis R, Fogg L, et al. Psychometric properties of the EuroQol-5D and Short Form-6D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(6):1209-16.
14. Zhao FL, Yue M, Yang H, Wang T, Wu JH, Li SC. Validation and comparison of EuroQol and short form 6D in chronic prostatitis patients. Value Health. 2010;13(5):649-56.
15. Fryback DG, Dunham NC, Palta M, Hanmer J, Buechner J, Cherepanov D, et al. US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study. Med Care. 2007;45(12):1162-70.
16. Feeny D, Spritzer K, Hays RD, Liu H, Ganiats TG, Kaplan RM, et al. Agreement about identifying patients who change over time: cautionary results in cataract and heart failure patients. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(2):273-86.
17. Hawthorne G, Osborne R. Population norms and meaningful differences for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) measure. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005;29(2):136-42.
18. Wooden M, Watson N. The HILDA Survey and its Contribution to Economic and Social Research (So Far). Econ Rec. 2007;83(261):208-31.
19. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 6227.0-Education and Work. Canberra (AUST): ABS; 2001. p. 39.
20. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. Br Med J. 2000;320:1240-3.
21. Kind P, Hardman G, Macran S. UK Population Norms for EQ-5D. York (UK): University of York; 1999.
22. Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day NA, Osborne R, McNeil H. Construction and Utility Scaling of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument. Melbourne (AUST): Monash University; 2000.
23. Broome J. QALYs. J Public Econ. 1993;50:149-67.
24. Spencer A. The TTO method and procedural invariance. Health Econ. 2003;12(8):655-68.
25. Dolan P. Modelling Valuations for EuroQol Health States. Med Care. 1997;35(11):1095-108.
26. Norman R, Cronin P, Viney R, King M, Street D, Ratcliffe J. International Comparisons in Valuing EQ-5D Health States: A Review And Analysis. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1194-200.
27. Viney R, Norman R, King MT, Cronin P, Street D, Knox S, et al. Time Trade-Off Derived EQ-5D Weights for Australia. Value Health. 2011;14:928-36.