Examining the Interaction between Level of Risk and Dosage of Treatment

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 338-348

  Sperber, Kimberly Gentry ^a   Latessa, Edward J ^b   Makarios, Matthew D ^c  

^a Talbert House   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PARKSIDE   (United States)

Author keywords

correctional treatment; dosage; recidivism; risk principle

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873643582     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854812467942     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 1995:.
2. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.The psychology of criminal conduct. 2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Cincinnati, OH: Anderson; 2006:.
3. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.,Hoge R. D.Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 1990;17:19-52.
4. Bonta J.Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2002;29:355-379.
5. Bourgon G.,Armstrong B.Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a "real world" prison setting.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2005;32:3-25.
6. Brusman-Lovins L.,Lowenkamp C. T.,Latessa E. J.,Smith P.Application of the risk principle to female offenders.Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 2007;23:383-398.
7. Cullen F. T.,Gendreau P.Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects.Criminal Justice. 2000;3:109-175.
8. Gendreau P.,Goggin C.,Smith P.Is the PCL-R really the "unparalleled" measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2002;29:397-426.
9. Hansen N. B.,Lambert M. J.,Forman E. M.The psychotherapy-dose response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2002;9:329-343.
10. Hser Y. I.,Grella C. E.,Chou C. P.,Anglin M. D.Relationships between drug treatment careers and outcomes: Findings from the national Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study.Evaluation Review. 1998;22:496-519.
11. Latessa E.,Brusman-Lovins L.,Smith P.Follow-up evaluation of Ohio's community based correctional facility and halfway house programs-Outcome study. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati; 2010:.
12. Lipsey M.Can intervention rehabilitate serious delinquents?.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1999;564:142-166.
13. Lipsey M.Primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview.Victims & Offenders. 2009;2:124-147.
14. Lipsey M. W.,Landenberger N. L.,Wilson S. J.Effects of cognitive behavioral programs for offenders.Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2007;6:1-27.
15. Loughran T. A.,Mulvey E. P.,Schubert C. A.,Fagan J.,Piquero A. R.,Losoya S. H.Estimating a dose-response relationship between length of stay and future recidivism in serious juvenile offenders.Criminology. 2009;47:699-740.
16. Lovins B.,Lowenkamp C. T.,Latessa E. J.Applying the risk principle to sex offenders: Can treatment make some sex offenders worse?.The Prison Journal. 2009;89:344-357.
17. Lowenkamp C. T.,Bechtel K.The predictive validity of the LSI-R on a sample of offenders drawn from the records of the Iowa Department of Corrections Management System.Federal Probation. 2007;71:25-29.
18. Lowenkamp C. T.,Latessa E. J.Topics in community corrections annual issue 2004: Assessment issues for managers. Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute of Corrections; 2004:3-8.
19. Lowenkamp C. T.,Latessa E. J.Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement.Criminology & Public Policy. 2005;4:262-290.
20. Lowenkamp C. T.,Latessa E. J.,Holsinger A.The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 cases and 97 correctional programs?.Crime & Delinquency. 2006;52:77-93.
21. Lowenkamp C. T.,Latessa E. J.,Smith P.Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention.Criminology & Public Policy. 2006;5:575-594.
22. Lowenkamp C. T.,Lovins B.,Latessa E. J.Validating the Level of Service Inventory-Revised and the Level of Service Inventory: Screening version with a sample of probationers.The Prison Journal. 2009;89:192-204.
23. Simpson D. D.,Joe G. W.,Brown B. S.Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS).Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1997;11:294-307.
24. Charting a new course. Roscoe, IL: Author; 1999:.
25. Wanberg K.,Milkman H.Criminal conduct and substance abuse treatment: Strategies for self-improvement and change: Pathways to responsible living-The provider's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2007:.
26. ZergerS. (2002). Substance abuse treatment: What works for homeless people? A review of the literature. National Health Care for the Homeless Council. Retrieved from http://homeless.samhsa.gov/ResourceFiles/bqmqhxpf.pdf.