Source apportionment of PM2.5 at the coastal area in Korea

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 447, Issue , 2013, Pages 370-380

  Choi, Jong kyu ^a   Heo, Jong Bae ^c   Ban, Soo Jin ^b   Yi, Seung Muk ^a   Zoh, Kyung Duk ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b National Institute of Biological Resources   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditional probability function (CPF); PM2.5; Positive matrix factorization (PMF); Potential source contribution function (PSCF); Principal component analysis (PCA)

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS-BURNING; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; CHEMICAL SPECIES; COASTAL AREA; CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY FUNCTION; COPPER PRODUCTION; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; INCHEON; INDUSTRIAL AREA; LOCAL SOURCE; MODELING TECHNIQUE; MOTOR VEHICLE; ORGANIC COMPOSITIONS; PCA ANALYSIS; POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; POTENTIAL SOURCE CONTRIBUTION FUNCTION; SEA SALTS; SECONDARY NITRATES; SECONDARY PARTICLES; SEOUL , KOREA; SOIL SOURCES; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; SOURCE AREA; SOURCE CONTRIBUTIONS; YELLOW SANDS;

COASTAL ZONES; COPPER SMELTING; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; VEHICLES;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS;

COPPER; NITRATE; ORGANIC COMPOUND; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SULFATE;

BIOMASS BURNING; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COASTAL ZONE; MATRIX; NITRATE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SULFATE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMBUSTION; CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY FUNCTION; INDUSTRIAL AREA; MOTOR VEHICLE; PARTICULATE MATTER; POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; POTENTIAL SOURCE CONTRIBUTION FUNCTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAND; SEASHORE; SOIL; SOUTH KOREA;

BIOMASS; CHINA; INDUSTRY; MOTOR VEHICLES; NITRATES; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; SOIL; SULFATES;

INCHEON [SOUTH KOREA]; SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 84873630355     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.047     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alexander V., Polissar A.V., Hopke P.K. Atmospheric aerosol over Vermont: chemical composition and sources. Environ Sci Technol 2001, 35:4604-4621.
2. Ashbaugh L.L., Malm W.C., Sadeh W.Z. A residence time probability analysis of sulfur concentrations at Grand Canyon National Park. Atmos Environ 1985, 19:1263-1270.
3. Bae M.S., Schauer J.J. Analysis of organic molecular markers in atmospheric fine particulate matter: understanding the impact of "unknown" point sources on chemical mass balance models. J Korean Societ Atmos Environ 2009, 25(3):219-236.
4. Birch M.E., Cary R.A. Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust. J Aerosol Sci Technol 1996, 25:221-241.
5. Brown S.G., Frankel A., Raffuse S.M., Roberts P.T., Hafner H.R., Anderson D.J. Source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Phoenix, AZ, using positive matrix factorization. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2007, 57:741-752.
6. Charlson R.J., Scharwtz S.E., Hales J.M., Cess R.D., Coakley J.A., Hansen J.E., et al. Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols. Science 1992, 255:423-430.
7. 2.5 aerosol in Incheon, Korea. Atmos Environ 2012, 60:583-592.
8. Chow J.C., Watson J.G., Pritchett L.C., Pierson W.R., Frazier C.A., Purcell R.G. The DRI thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in US air quality studies. Atmos Environ 1993, 27:1185-1201.
9. Draxler R.R., Rolph G.D. HYSPLIT4 (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model 2007, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD, [available at: http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html/].
10. Du S.Y., Rodenburg L.A. Source identification of atmospheric PCBs in Philadelphia/Camden using positive matrix factorization followed by the potential source contribution function. Atmos Environ 2007, 41:8596-8608.
11. Gildemeister A.E., Hopke P.K., Kim E.G. Sources of fine urban particulate matter in Detroit, MI. Chemosphere 2007, 69:1064-1074.
12. Hamilton J.F., Webb P.J., Lewis A.C., Hopkins J.R., Smith S., Davy P. Partially oxidised organic components in urban aerosol using GC×GC-TOF/MS. Atmos Chem Phys 2004, 4:1279-1290.
13. Han Y.J., Holsen T.M., Hopke P.K., Cheong J.P., Kim H., Yi S.M. Identification of source locations for atmospheric dry deposition of heavy metals during yellow-sand events in Seoul, Korea in 1998 using hybrid receptor models. Atmos Environ 2004, 38:5353-5361.
14. 2.5 in Beijing, China. Atmos Environ 2001, 35:4959-4970.
15. 2.5 species and long-range transport of air masses at Taean background station, South Korea. Atmos Environ 2003, 37:219-230.
16. 2.5 in Seoul, Korea. Atmos Chem Phys 2009, 8:20427-20461.
17. Hopke P.K., Barrie L.A., Li S.M., Cheng M.D., Li C., Xie Y. Possible sources and preferred pathways for biogenic and non-sea salt sulfur for the high Arctic. J Geophys Res 1995, 100:16595-16603.
18. Hsu Y.K., Holsen T.M., Hopke P.K. Comparison of hybrid receptor models to locate PCB sources in Chicago. Atmos Environ 2003, 37(4):545-562.
19. Hughes L.S., Allen J.O., Bhave P., Kleeman M.J., Cass G.R., Liu D.Y., et al. Evolution of atmospheric particles along trajectories crossing the Los Angeles basin. Environ Sci Technol 2000, 34:3058-3068.
20. 2.5 at a west coastal IMPROVE site. Atmos Environ 2007, 41(3):506-518.
21. Ito K., Christensen W.F., Eatough D.J., Henry R.C., Kim E.G., Laden F., et al. PM source apportionment and health effects: 2. An investigation of intermethod variability in associations between source apportioned fine particle mass and daily mortality in Washington, DC. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2006, 16:300-310.
22. Jaffe D., Bertshci I., Jaegle L., Novelli P., Reid J.S., Tanimoto H., et al. Long-range transport of Siberian biomass burning emissions and impact on surface ozone in western North America. Geophys Res Lett 2004, 31:L16106/1. 10.1029/2004GL020093.
23. 2.5 species during hazy episodes in Seoul, South Korea. Atmos Environ 2004, 38(28):4749-4760.
24. Kim E.G., Hopke P.K. Source characterization of ambient fine particles at multiple sites in the Seattle area. Atmos Environ 2008, 42:6047-6056.
25. - formation in East Asia. Atmos Environ 2006, 40(12):2139-2150.
26. 2.5) at a rural Ohio River Valley site. Atmos Environ 2007, 41(39):9231-9243.
27. Kim E., Hopke P.K., Edgerton E.S. Source identification of Atlanta aerosol by positive matrix factorization. J Air Waste Manage 2003, 53(6):731-739.
28. 2.5 in an arid Northwest U.S. City by positive matrix factorization. Atmos Res 2003, 66:291-305.
29. KMA-ADC Korea Meteorological Administration, Asian Dust Center available at:. http://www.kma.go.kr/eng/weather/asiandust.
30. Kondo Y., Miyazaki Y., Takegawa N., Miyakawa T., Weber R.J., Jimenez J.L., et al. Oxygenated and water-soluble organic aerosols in Tokyo. J Geophys Res 2007, 109:D01203. 10.1029/2006JD007056.
31. Laden F., Neas L.M., Dockery D.W., Schwartz J. Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six U.S. cities. Environ Health Perspect 2000, 108:941-947.
32. Larsen R.K., Baker J.E. Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the urban atmosphere: a comparison of three methods. Environ Sci Technol 2003, 37:1873-1881.
33. 2.5 in St. Louis, MO using speciation trends network data. Atmos Environ 2006, 40:S360-S377.
34. Lee J.Y., Lane D.A. Formation of oxidized products from the reaction of gaseous phenanthrene with the OH radical in a reaction chamber. Atmos Environ 2010, 44:2469-2477.
35. Lee E., Chan CK Chak K., Paatero P. Application of positive matrix factorization in source apportionment of particulate pollutants in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 1999, 33:3201-3212.
36. Li Z., Hopke P.K., Husain L., Qureshi S., Dutkiewicz V.A., Schwab J.J., et al. Sources of fine particle composition in New York City. Atmos Environ 2004, 38:6521-6529.
37. Liu W., Hopke P.K., Han Y.J., Yi S.M., Holsen T.M., Cybartc S., et al. (b) Application of receptor modeling to atmospheric constituents at Potsdam and Stockton, NY. Atmos Environ 2003, 37(12):4997-5007.
38. Lough G.C., Schauer J.J., Park J.S., Shafer M.M., Deminter J.T., Weinstein J.P. Emissions of metals associated with motor vehicle roadways. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39(3):826-836.
39. Lu Z., Streets D.G., Zhang Q., Wang S., Carmichael G.R., Cheng Y.F., et al. Sulfur dioxide emissions in China and sulfur trends in East Asia since 2000. Atmos Chem Phys 2010, 10:6311-6331.
40. Mazurek M., Simoneit B., Cass G., Gray H. Quantitative high-resolution gas-chromatography and high-resolution gas-chromatography mass spectrometry analyses of carbonaceous fine aerosol particles. Intern J Environ Anal Chem 1987, 29:119-139.
41. Ogulei D., Hopke P.K., Zhou J.L., Paatero P., Park S.S., John M., et al. Receptor modeling for multiple time resolved species: the Baltimore supersite. Atmos Environ 2005, 39:3751-3762.
42. Ogulei D., Hopke P.K., Zhou J.L., Pancras P., Nair N., Ondov J.M. Source apportionment of Baltimore aerosol from combined size distribution and chemical composition data. Atmos Environ 2006, 40:S396-S410.
43. Paatero P. Least squares formulation of robust, non-negative factor analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab 1997, 37(1):23-35.
44. Paatero P., Hopke P.K. Discarding or downweighting high noise variables in factor analytic models. Anal Chim Acta 2003, 490(1):277-289.
45. Paatero P., Tapper U. Positive matrix factorization: a non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. Environmetrics 1994, 5(2):111-126.
46. Park S.S., Kim Y.J. Source contributions to fine particulate matter in an urban atmosphere. Chemosphere 2005, 59(22):217-226.
47. Polissar A.V., Hopke P.K., Paatero P., Malm W.C., Sisler J.F. Atmospheric aerosol over Alaska 2. Elemental composition and sources. J Geophys Res 1998, 103(D15):19045-19057.
48. Polissar A.V., Hopke P.K., Harris J.M. Source regions for atmospheric aerosol measured at Barrow, Alaska. Environ Sci Technol 2001, 35(21):4214-4226.
49. 2.5 in Spain. J Aerosol Sci 2004, 35:1151-1172.
50. Rizzo M.J., Scheff P.A. Fine particulate source apportionment using data from the USEPA speciation trends network in Chicago, Illinois: comparison of two source apportionment models. Atmos Environ 2007, 41:6276-6288.
51. Russel M., Allen D.T. Seasonal and spatial trends in primary and secondary organic carbon concentrations in south Texas. Atmos Environ 2004, 38:3225-3239.
52. Schwartz J. What are people dying of on high air pollution days. Environ Res 1994, 64:26-35.
53. Schwartz J., Dockery D.W. Increased mortality in Philadelphia associated with daily air pollution concentrations. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992, 145:600-604.
54. Schauer J.J., Kleeman M., Cass G., Simoneit B. Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 4. C-1-C-27 organic compounds from cooking with seed oils. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36:567-575.
55. Seinfeld J.H., Pandis S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics: From Air Pollution To Climate Change 1998, Wiley, New York.
56. Sheesley R.J., Schauer J.J., Bean E., Kenski D. Trends in secondary organic aerosol at a remote site in Michigan's upper peninsula. Environ Sci Technol 2004, 38:6491-6500.
57. Shrivastava M.K., Subramanian R., Rogge W.F., Robinson A.L. Sources of organic aerosol: positive matrix factorization of molecular marker data and comparison of results from different source apportionment models. Atmos Environ 2007, 41:9353-9369.
58. Simoneit B.R.T., Kobayashi M., Mochida M., Kawamura K., Lee M., Lim H.J., et al. Composition and major sources of organic compounds of aerosol particulate matter sampled during the ACE-Asia campaign. J Geophys Res 2004, 109. 10.1029/2004JD004598.
59. Song X.H., Polissar A.V., Hopke P.K. Source of fine particle composition in the northern eastern US. Atmos Environ 2001, 35(31):5277-5286.
60. 2.5 in Beijing by positive matrix factorization. Atmos Environ 2006, 40:1526-1537.
61. Streets D.G., Bond T.C., Carnmichael G.R., Fernandes S.D., Fu Q., He D., et al. An inventory of gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in Asia in the year 2000. J Geophys Res 2003, 108:D21. 10.1029/2002JD003093.
62. 2.5 mass in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Atmos Environ 2007, 41:7414-7433.
63. Viana M., Kuhlbusch T.A.J., Querol X., Alastuey A., Harrison R.M., Hopke P.K., et al. Source apportionment of particulate matter in Europe: a review of methods and results. Aerosol Sci 2008, 39:827-849.
64. Wang Y., Zhung G., Tang A., Zhang W., Sun Y., Wang Z., et al. The evolution of chemical components of aerosols at five monitoring sites of China during dust storms. Atmos Environ 2007, 41(5):1091-1106.
65. 4 via animal farming in South, Southeast, and East Asia. Atmos Environ 2004, 38:7111-7121.
66. Yoon H.Y., Lee H.K., Kim J.H., Lee I.J., Kwan J.O. A study on the plan to improve the environment Incheon sea port and near site. 2005, Incheon Development Institute, [available at: http://www.idi.re.kr/].
67. Zhang Y., Dore A.J., Ma L., Liu X.J., Ma W.Q., Cape J.N., et al. Agricultural ammonia emissions inventory and spatial distribution in the North China Plain. Environ Pollut 2010, 158(2):490-501.
68. 2.5 nitrate and sulfate in China using a source-oriented chemical transport model. Atmos Environ 2012, 62:228-242.