Optical music imaging: Music document digitisation, recognition, evaluation, and restoration

Interactive Multimedia Music Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 50-79

  Jones, Graham ^a   Ong, Bee ^b   Bruno, Ivan ^c   Ng, Kia ^b  

^a Sight Synthesis ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873628280     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-150-6.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Bainbridge, D., & Bell, T. (2001). The challenge of optical music recognition. Computers and the Humanities, 35, 95-121.
2. Bainbridge, D., & Carter, N. (1997). Automatic recognition of music notation. In H. Bunke & P. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of optical character recognition and document image analysis (pp. 557-603). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
3. th International Conference on Image Processing and Its Applications (pp. 474-478).
4. Bellini, P., Bruno, I., & Nesi, P. (2001). Optical music sheet segmentation. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on WEB Delivering of MUSIC (pp. 183-190).
5. Bellini, P., & Nesi, P. (2001). Wedelmusic format: An XML music notation format for emerging applications.In Proceedings of the First International Conference on WEB Delivering of MUSIC (pp. 79-86).
6. Blostein, D., & Baird, H. S. (1992). A critical survey of music image analysis. In H. S. Baird, H. Bunke, & K. Yamamoto (Eds.), Structured document image analysis (pp. 405-434). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. st MUSICNETWORK Open Workshop, Darmstadt, Germany.
8. capella-scan (n.d.). capella Software, Retrieved February 9, 2003, from http://www.whc.de/
9. Carter, N. P. (1992). Segmentation and preliminary recognition of madrigals notated in white mensural notation. Machine Vision and Applications, 5(3), 223-30.
10. Carter, N. P. (1994). Conversion of the Haydn symphonies into electronic form using automatic score recognition: A pilot study. In L. M. Vincent & T. Pavlidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the SPIE-Document Recognition, 2181, (pp. 279-290).
11. Carter, N. P., & Bacon, R. A. (1990). Automatic recognition of music notation. InProceedings of the International Association for Pattern Recognition Workshop on Syntactic and Structural Pattern Recognition, 482.
12. Choudhury, G. S., DiLauro, T., Droettboom, M., Fujinaga, I., Harrington, B., & MacMillan, K. (2000). Optical music recognition system within a large-scale digitization project. International Conference on Music Information Retrieval.
13. Cooper, D., Ng, K. C., & Boyle, R. D. (1997). An extension of the MIDI file format: expressive MIDI-expMIDI. In E. Selfridge-Field (Ed.), Beyond MIDI: The handbook of musical codes (pp. 80-98) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Coüasnon, B. (2002). Improving optical music recognition. Position paper, First MUSICNET-WORK Open Workshop, Darmstadt, Germany, 2002.
15. Coüasnon, B., & Rétif, B. (1995). Using a grammar for a reliable full score recognition system. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC) (pp. 187-194).
16. Crombie, D., Fuschi, D., Mitolo, N., Nesi, P., Ng, K., & Ong, B. (2005). Bringing music industry into the interactive multimedia age. AXMEDIS International Conference, Florence, Italy. IEEE Computer Society Press.
17. Dancing dots (n.d.). Goodfeel Braille Music Translator. Retrieved August 8, 2002, from http://www.dancingdots.com
18. Fahmy, H., & Blostein, D. (1994). A graph-rewriting approach to discrete relaxation: Application to music recognition. InProceedings of the SPIE, 2181,(pp. 291-302).
19. Fahmy, H., & Blostein, D. (1998). A graph-rewriting paradigm for discrete relaxation: Application to sheet-music recognition. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 12(6), 763-99.
20. Fujinaga, I. (1996). Exemplar-based learning in adaptive optical music recognition system.In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 55-56).
21. Fujinaga, I. (1988). Optical music recognition using projections. Master Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
22. th International Congress of the International Musicological Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Fujinaga, I., Alphonce, B., & Pennycook, B. (1992). Interactive optical music recognition. InProceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 117-120).
24. rd International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2002), IRCAM-Centre Pompidou, Paris.
25. Gezerlis, V. G., & Theodoridis, S. (2000). An optical music recognition system for the notation of the Orthodox Hellenic Byzantine Music. International Conference of Pattern Recognition (ICPR-2000), Barcelona, Spain.
26. Good, M. (2001). MusicXML for notation and analysis. In W. B. Hewlett & E. Selfridge-Field, E. (Eds.), The virtual score: Representation, retrieval, restoration. Computing in Musicology, 12, 113-124.
27. Good, M. (2002). MusicXML in practice: Issues in translation and analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference MAX 2002: Musical Application Using XML, Milan (pp. 47-54).
28. Hoos, H. H., Hamel, K. A., Renz, K., & Kilian, J. (1998). The GUIDO music notation format-A novel approach for adequately representing scorelevel music.In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 451-454).
29. Jones, G. (in press). Using a shape classifier as part of a larger system.
30. Matsushima, T., Harada, T., Sonomoto, I., Kanamori, K., Uesugi, A., Nimura, Y., Hashimoto, S., & Ohteru, S. (1985). Automated recognition system for musical score: The vision system of WABOT-2. Bulletin of Science and Engineering Research Laboratory, Waseda University.
31. th MUSICNETWORK Open Workshop, Universität für Musik und darstellende Kunst Wien, Vienna, Austria.
32. Miyao, H., & Haralick, R. M. (2000). Format of ground truth data used in the evaluation of the results of an optical music recognition system. IAPR Workshop on Document Analysis Systems.
33. Ng, K. C. (1995). Automated computer recognition of music scores. PhD Thesis, School of Computing, University of Leeds, UK.
34. Ng, K. C. (2001). Music manuscript tracing. Proceedings of the Fourth IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition (GREC 2001), Canada (pp. 470-481).
35. Ng, K. C. (2002). Document imaging for music manuscript. In Proceedings of the Sixth World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI 2002), Orlando, USA, XVIII (pp. 546-549).
36. Ng, K. C. (guest editor). (2005). Journal of New Music Research (JNMR) special issue on Multimedia Music and the World Wide Web, 34(2).
37. Ng, K. C., & Boyle, R. D. (1992). Segmentation of music primitives. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (pp. 472-480).
38. Ng, K. C., & Boyle, R. D. (1996). Reconstruction of music scores from primitives subsegmentation. Image and Vision Computing.
39. Ng, K. C., Boyle, R. D., & Cooper, D. (1996). Automatic detection of tonality using note distribution. Journal of New Music Research, 25(4), 369-381.
40. Ng, K. C., & Cooper D. (2000). Enhancement of optical music recognition using metric analysis. Proceedings of the XIII CIM 2000-Colloquium on Musical Informatics, Italy.
41. Ng, K. C., Cooper, D., Stefani, E., Boyle, R. D., & Bailey, N. (1999). Embracing the composer: Optical recognition of hand-written manuscripts. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC'99)-Embracing Mankind, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China (pp. 500-503).
42. Ng, K. C., Ong, S. B., Nesi, P., Mitolo, N., Fuschi, D., & Crombie, D. (2005, July 25-29). Interactive Multimedia Technologies for Music, EVA 2005 London International Conference, UK.
43. OMeR (n.d.). Optical Music easy Reader, Myriad Software, Retrieved February 8, 2003, from http://www.myriad-online.com/omer.htm
44. PhotoScore (n.d.). Neuratron. Retrieved February 8, 2003, from http://www.neuratron.com/photoscore.htm
45. Pinto, J., Vieira, P., Ramalho, M., Mengucci, M., Pina, P., & Muge, F. (2000). Ancient music recovery for digital libraries. Fourth European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2000), Lisbon.
46. Porck, H. J., & Teygeler, R. (2000). Preservation science survey: An overview of recent developments in research on the conservation of selected analogue library and archival materials. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
47. Pruslin, D. H. (1966). Automated recognition of sheet music. Doctor of Science dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
48. Roads, C. (1986). The Tsukuba musical robot. Computer Music Journal, 10(2), 39-43.
49. Roth, M. (1994). An approach to recognition of printed music. Extended Diploma Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zürich, CH-8092, Switzerland.
50. Scorscan (n.d.). npc Imaging. Retrieved August 8, 2002, from http://www.npcimaging.com
51. Selfridge-Field, E. (1994). Optical recognition of music notation: A survey of current work. In W. B. Hewlett & E. Selfridge-Field (Eds.), Computing in Musicology: An International Directory of Applications, 9, pp. 109-145.
52. SharpEye (n.d.). visiv. Retrieved August 8, 2002, from http://www.visiv.co.uk
53. SmartScore (n.d.). Musitek. Retrieved February 8, 2002, from http://www.musitek.com/
54. Stückelberg, M. V., & Doermann, D. (1999). On musical score recognition using probabilistic reasoning. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. Bangolore, India.
55. Stückelberg, M. V., Pellegrini, C., & Hilario, M. (1997). An architecture for musical score recognition using high-level domain knowledge.In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2, (pp. 813-818).
56. Suen, C. Y., & Wang, P. S. P. (1994). Thinning methodologies for pattern recognition. Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence, 8.
57. Vivaldi Scan (n.d.). VivaldiStudio. Retrieved February 8, 2003, from http://www.vivaldistudio.com/Eng/VivaldiScan.asp
58. Wächter, W., Liers, J., & Becker, E. (1996). Paper splitting at the German Library in Leipzig. Development from Craftsmanship to Full Mechanisation. Restaurator, 17, 32-42.